@ turbo

[Blueprint]

Steve, care to ponder about this one.  What happens when you increase the number of possibilities?   What then happens to those repeat chances?

[Blueprint]

Still dancing around and not answering direct questions.

He answered it, clearly.  You can't grasp the fact you won't see 37 UNIQUE numbers in 37 spins. 

[The General]

Turbo, Scarface,

Why do you suppose it is that all of the experts, mathematicians, and history say that you're wrong?

Are either of you actuaries or mathematicians?  Do either of you gamble professionally?
What do you suppose would happen if you were to post your claims on the wizardofvegas, where several actuaries and mathematicians often post?



Yes, I think we know what the results would be as well.

[Steve]

He answered it, clearly.  You can't grasp the fact you won't see 37 UNIQUE numbers in 37 spins. 

I was referring to these questions:

Turbo, what makes 37 numbers in 37 spins less likely than any other combination of numbers?

So there's only 2 possibilities left:

1. Your system works with any "rare sequence" and not just repeaters.
2. You're in a corner again.

So which is it, 1? Please confirm so we can move on.

Please direct me to his clear answers.

And blueprint, you just arent getting it. Let's focus on turbos answers.

[Blueprint]

Turbo, what makes 37 numbers in 37 spins less likely than any other combination of numbers?

Night and day, man.  Night and day.

[The General]

Turbo, Scarface,

You know how you feel when you argue with flat earth followers about whether or not the earth is round?

Well that's how those of us that grasp basic probability feel right now. 

[Blueprint]

I was referring to these questions:

Please direct me to his clear answers.

And blueprint, you just arent getting it. Let's focus on turbos answers.

Yea, ok.

[The General]

He answered it, clearly.  You can't grasp the fact you won't see 37 UNIQUE numbers in 37 spins.

That argument fits about as well as saying because there's water at the bottom of the ocean. 

[Steve]

Night and day, man.  Night and day.

Clear answer, like turbos. You dont have any idea do you?

Since you claim to know the answer, what is it?

[TurboGenius]

Why do you suppose it is that all of the experts, mathematicians, and history say that you're wrong?

"All of the experts" ?
It's ok to be wrong you know. I know it's an unacceptable concept but...

Do either of you gamble professionally?

Do I have to ?  Does that change the math ? Strange. Are you going to tell me I have to make millions too ?  You guys obsessed with "millions". Strange (again)

What do you suppose would happen if you were to post your claims on the wizardofvegas, where several actuaries and mathematicians often post?

Oh no - not there !!!!!!!!!!   lol.
Is that your mecca or something ? Is there a pilgrimage once per year
where everyone meets up and writes "roulette can't be beaten" on paper and they
stuff it into a rock or something ?
I thought THIS was the place to post stuff. Dammit I'm in the wrong place lol
Effect on my actual winnings = 0, math is unchanged. whew.

Galileo was right - everyone told him he was wrong. "vehement suspicion of heresy".
All of the proof was against him - the "experts", the church. Poor guy couldn't get a break - his works were placed on banned reading lists. Shame.
I won't compare myself to that guy - but around here by a few people, I can see how frustrated he must have been in his last years.

[TurboGenius]

You know how you feel when you argue with flat earth followers about whether or not the earth is round?

I used to feel frustrated - until I understood that I was wrong, and the earth being flat or round was based on my observation (round) and not always the case depending on who's observing it. Like a photon heading towards earth would see it as flat. But saying it's round just means I see it from my point of view and no other - which is wrong.
Or like putting a clock on a plane and one of the ground - when the plane lands the clocks are different because no one used to understand that speed and time were connected. Go figure.
Did you know when you bounce a basketball on the ground - it never touches the ground ?
NEVER. Who would have thought that 20 years ago, now it's proven fact.
I guess it's how things work - everything is impossible or a lie until you someday realize that anything is possible and there's more truth then you let yourself understand.
That's your own journey from ignorance to intelligence, enjoy.

[Blueprint]

Clear answer, like turbos. You dont have any idea do you?

First you need to understand the question, and you don't. 

How many ways can you have 37 uniques in 37 spins?   How many ways can you have any other sequence in 37 spins?    I know, it's confusing to you but it's pretty simple.  If you have EVEN ONE repeat then you DO NOT have 37 uniques in 37 spins.   So, tell me how it's just as likely as ANY other sequence?   Explain that to me since you seem to have all the answers. 

[Steve]

Turbo what dribble is that? Why avoiding questions?

[Steve]

So, tell me how it's just as likely as ANY other sequence?   Explain that to me since you seem to have all the answers.

Here's an example in english:

you're missing the fact any sequence of numbers is just as unlikely. You're not understanding this:

ON SPIN 1: There are 37 numbers on the european wheel. The odds of any number on the next spin are 1 in 37. Let's say #2 won.

ON SPIN 2: Let's say #2 won again. We we have just 1 unique number in 2 spins. So the odds of the number repeating are still 1 in 37 because we only have one number. The odds of the number not repeating is 1 in 37 too.

ON SPIN 3: Say #32 won. Now we have 2 unique numbers in 3 spins. So for the NEXT spin, the odds of a repeat are now 2/37.

ON SPIN 4: Say #4 won. Now we have 3 unique numbers. So the odds of a repeat on the next spin are 3/37.

So we can see the more spins we play, the more likely there will be a repeat. Really basic probability.

Can we use this? No. Because the odds of the next spin are still 1 in 37. It's really not complicated.

It doesnt matter what magical sequence you think will or wont happen, you are still stuck with 1 in 37.

So turbo, your follower blueprint thinks your magic sequence is less likely than any other sequence. Please confirm, is he right?

[Blueprint]

Here's an example in english:

So turbo, your follower blueprint thinks your magic sequence is less likely than any other sequence. Please confirm, is he right?

Now I'm a follower.  Must be a full moon or something or  you're just a lunatic as many have stated behind the scenes. 

As mentioned earlier, no idea what he's doing nor do I give a crap.   I'm not talking about a magic sequence and neither his he.  In your spin 2, you ALREADY had a repeat.  How the hell is that an example of THIRTY-SEVEN (let me spell it out for you in case the numbers have you tripped up) in THIRTY-SEVEN spins. 

Sorry I got involved.  Carry on with your egotistical salesy bullshit.