@ turbo

[Turner]

This....same as 37 of the same number

Sorry...did I get the answer wrong or is it because I not turbo?

[TurboGenius]

Wait your turn to be scolded Turner !   

lol

[Steve]

Turner that looks like normal distribution. You cant use it to change odds. Imagine a normal distribution chart for red/black, like around half reds/blacks. It doesnt help at all.

If you think otherwise, explain how.

[Steve]

Wait your turn to be scolded Turner !   
lol

I'm still waiting for my answers turbo. Is there a problem with your logic preventing a clear answer?

[cht]

Flat earth was debunked by steve-o.

but back to the topic, good job CHT, keep it going! 

Another 5consecutive winning games just for you. luck streak looks pretty good.

[TurboGenius]

Now I'm a follower.  Must be a full moon or something or  you're just a lunatic as many have stated behind the scenes. 

Anyone who believes the game can be beaten or has figured out a way (or ways) to do this are lumped into a pile and I'm supposedly the leader. Sorry.

[TurboGenius]

I'm still waiting for my answers turbo. Is there a problem with your logic preventing a clear answer?

I've already answered - as said above that I already answered.
I'm not your circus monkey and I'm not jumping through hoops (or the same hoop) over and over. I explained it clearly. Thanks and goodnight.

[cht]

Sorry...did I get the answer wrong or is it because I not turbo?

You got it right

- its the frequency distribution probability that's relevant.

wizardofodds guys like steve and general got it wrong misquoting their 1 to 37 for each individual spins.

[MoneyT101]

Here's an example in english:

So turbo, your follower blueprint thinks your magic sequence is less likely than any other sequence. Please confirm, is he right?

Steve your so stuck in getting your point across that you aren’t paying attention

[Turner]

Turner that looks like normal distribution. You cant use it to change odds. Imagine a normal distribution chart for red/black, like around half reds/blacks. It doesnt help at all.

If you think otherwise, explain how.

Your question was....what makes 37 numbers in 37 spins less likely.
Thats my answer. And its correct
Binomial distribution

[Steve]

As mentioned earlier, no idea what he's doing nor do I give a crap

Then if you have no idea, and dont give a crap,  stay out of the conversation.

Carry on with your egotistical salesy bullshit.

Are you that narrow-minded? Every time someone mentions my technology, I shift away from it because its not relevant to the discussion. We are talking about fact vs fiction here. Is General selling something? Is the rest of the professional world working for me? Grow up.

I've already answered - as said above that I already answered.

Oh I see. Would you be so kind to cut and paste your answer for me?

I'm not your circus monkey and I'm not jumping through hoops (or the same hoop) over and over. I explained it clearly. Thanks and goodnight.

Strange. You can post pages of dribble, and when simple questions are asked, you run away stroppy.

Your question was....what makes 37 numbers in 37 spins less likely.

Actually yes you are correct. My question was incorrect. It was supposed to be "what makes one sequence of 37 numbers less likely than another?".

So assuming you know Turbo's secret, you are saying he is betting on the likelihood that some numbers will be repeats. that just comes back to this:

ON SPIN 1: There are 37 numbers on the european wheel. The odds of any number on the next spin are 1 in 37. Let's say #2 won.

ON SPIN 2: Let's say #2 won again. We we have just 1 unique number in 2 spins. So the odds of the number repeating are still 1 in 37 because we only have one number. The odds of the number not repeating is 1 in 37 too.

ON SPIN 3: Say #32 won. Now we have 2 unique numbers in 3 spins. So for the NEXT spin, the odds of a repeat are now 2/37.

ON SPIN 4: Say #4 won. Now we have 3 unique numbers. So the odds of a repeat on the next spin are 3/37.

So we can see the more spins we play, the more likely there will be a repeat. Really basic probability.

Can we use this? No. Because the odds of the next spin are still 1 in 37. It's really not complicated.

[cht]

Your question was....what makes 37 numbers in 37 spins less likely.
Thats my answer. And its correct

Correct.

As the number of repeats increase the probability increases to the top of the bell curve of average 12 repeats before it drops back down as the number of repeats continue to increase.

[Steve]

As the number of repeats increase the probability increases to the top of the bell curve of average 12 repeats before it drops back down as the number of repeats continue to increase.

Yes I said that in my example before.

To clarify, my question is: what makes one sequence of 37 numbers less likely than another?

[cht]

To clarify, my question is: what makes one sequence of 37 numbers less likely than another?

The pobability of any sequence depends on the number of repeats contained in the sequence  of 37 spins. Turner's bell curve graph clearly demonstrates this.

can you approve my moderated posts
can you put me on watch instead of moderated

[Steve]

CHT all the bell curve shows is what i said before in my example. But you cant use that as I already explained. It is mathematically impossible because there are still the same number of pockets and the same payout.