@ turbo

[cht]

Just curious, what is it about his "system" is it that you find so ground breaking, and novel? If you can be specific.

Valid question deserves a proper response.

TG's method is based on the characteristic of frequency distribution.

[The General]

Valid question deserves a proper response.

TG's method is based on the characteristic of frequency distribution.

  In other words, hot numbers.  LOL!!!

“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.”

I'm guessing that's all you could come up with huh? 

[cht]

  In other words, hot numbers.  LOL!!!

“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.”

I'm guessing that's all you could come up with huh? 

You should be smart enough to realise that that's all I'm willing to post on forum.

[The General]

You should be smart enough to realise that that's all I'm willing to post on forum.

I'm smart enough to know that you don't know much about basic probability and roulette.

[cht]

I'm smart enough to know that you don't know much about basic probability and roulette.

I responded to your question not because I want to be right.

There are a number of members who PMed me to point them in the right direction.
And that's what I do for them.

To those who PMed me - Read also the posts of scarface, Nimo

Steve and caleb can have the last say.

[The General]

I responded to your question not because I want to be right.

There are a number of members who PMed me to point them in the right direction.
And that's what I do.

You can have the last say.

To those who PMed me - Read also the posts of scarface, Nimo

Anyone that PMs you is playing the secret squirrel game and is wasting their time.   

[Joe]

 

[Roulettebeater]

The sucker is used to keep sucking. Maestro

[maestro]

Passion,

Just curious, why do you test for so few spins? 

because later can sink down....

The sucker is used to keep sucking. Maestro

[Scarface]

I'm smart enough to know that you don't know much about basic probability and roulette.

General seems like you don't understand basic probability too well.  I've said it many times, random is very predictable.  You suggest to others to test more spins.  Why don't you try it?  Test 108 spins (3 rounds of 36).  Run this test over and over as many times as you think is significant enough....how many times were there an equal distribution of repeaters vs How many times were there 1 or 2 numbers that jumped ahead by a few hits? 

Probability is WHY repeaters win.  Probability tells us there will be an average ratio of 9 to1 hits between hottest and coldest number. 

[The General]

Scarface,

I'm not sure as to why you're still rambling on about  law of the third/binomial distribution and it would appear that you don't know either.

Don't worry though, Turbo will rise in three days.

[Scarface]

Scarface,

I'm not sure as to why you're still rambling on about  law of the third/binomial distribution and it would appear that you don't know either.

Because I believe there is hope for you, General.  I'm not giving up on you 

[The General]

Scar,

Probability doesn't tell you which numbers are more likely to hit on the next spin, the next series of spins, or in the long run.  Understand?

[Scarface]

Does for me.  Also, tells me what not to bet.   

[junscissorhands]

All that mumbo jumbo bull shit, point to right direction bullshit, holy grail, secret gypsy squirrel game crap.

All the talk, post your damn winnings instead of stupid graphs of RX or parx or any other shit.

Same shit different day, all the frigging false claims, sick of it.