@ turbo

[The General]

Notto,

A quick suggestion.

You should try and explain what it is that you're actually doing  rather than just showing charts all the time.  I suspect most people don't know what it is that you're trying show.  It's kind of a mess.

Again, just trying to be helpful.

[nottophammer]

A few i've been in touch with should.
But don't expect me to get in touch with you. Any way it gives you something to post about, brighten your dull life up.

[The General]

A few i've been in touch with should.
But don't expect me to get in touch with you. Any way it gives you something to post about, brighten your dull life up.

My suggestion:

Each post provide a brief review:

1. As to how your bets are selected and defined parameters before the bets were actually made.
2. The amount bet in units only at each spin.
3. The max draw down in units.
4. The win in units.
5. How the degrees of freedom were limited and why the graph/charts are relevant.  This helps the reader understand just how much the results are or are not curve fitted by looking forwards and backwards in time in the spins data.

The reason I point this out is because most readers will be lost when looking at each of these posts in this never ending thread.  By providing the review with your charts each spin you'll help keep your readers engaged. 

Just trying to be helpful.   

-The General

[nottophammer]

Let them work it out, it's @Turbo so what do you want spoon fed

[The General]

[nottophammer]

What the f--- do i want that for. Just a bit of paper to track does the job.
Up to the red line +535


I folded the bets off, don't want you seeing the bets, or i'd send the method to you, but i won't waste my time, 36*1,5,25

[Nimo]

Notto,

A quick suggestion.

You should try and explain what it is that you're actually doing  rather than just showing charts all the time.  I suspect most people don't know what it is that you're trying show.  It's kind of a mess.

Again, just trying to be helpful.

Why don't you actually read Notto's posts thoroughly rather than post a gif of something?  If you read his posts and comprehended what  you read, you would know exactly what he was doing.  He has posted more information than a lot of people on here,  The hours and hours of work he has done and he shares it.  That's being helpful.

[nottophammer]

Had the win on spin 26, betting 4#'s, should have done what i said to the few, never bet over 8#'s, in 62 spins only 4 and 19 not hit.
Thats R.org for you.

[nottophammer]

And the R1's just came

[nottophammer]

R.org

[The General]

Good grief it's painful to watch your testing results.   Please let me fast track this for you guys.   My sims will give you all the details and run it almost instantly.

But first we need to define something.

1. You want to try and bet on the top four numbers using a 38 spins horizon, correct?  If so, then that equates to betting on any number that's about two hits above expectation.

[nottophammer]

nope

[The General]

nope

Ermm...FYI that's basically all there is to Turbo's system.  Of course he changes the rules around to include stop losses and money management scenarios, but none of those have an effect on system edge.

[Nimo]

Ermm...FYI that's basically all there is to Turbo's system.  Of course he changes the rules around to include stop losses and money management scenarios, but none of those have an effect on system edge.

It's not what Notto is doing, and it's not what Turbo does either.  Re read everything and comprehend it.  You are assuming based upon what you believe is going on, not what was written.  Stop losses aren't required, the game tells you when to stop.  Money management is always required, in, roulette as well as in life in general.  As cliche as it sounds think outside the box. 

[Turner]

You are assuming based upon what you believe is going on, not what was written

A very true assessment of Caleb in a nutshell.