@ turbo

[Winner]

hello gentlemen, what's up? How have the holidays gone and how have they started the year?
Well I hope everyone is well and keep fighting for the dream of winning at roulette, because if it can be achieved.
I continue to do thousands of tests on the dyksexlic and I come to tell you that the first step you have to do, is to discover the intervals that Turbo speaks, because there you will realize that everything Turbo says is completely true and if you can achieve totally flat win, after that you will only have to find the way to play the numbers and use an aggressive progression to make the most of this type of game and sometimes win in less balls and sometimes in longer paths due to complications that can Give your own chance.
I'm going to put a session that I just made just playing flat with chips of 25 euros, so you can see that Turbo is a genius and discovered something mathematically winning.
Once you realize what Turbo does, you know you can win each session.

What turbo does you will not know cause what he does is open to interpretation.

[Madi]

So you moved from best dysexlic to turbo now. Then turbo to vaddi. Vaddi to EC bet. One thing turbo did bad. He taught people just to show the winning session not to mention there r losing as well. And the scammer got a way....

[Bigbroben]

hello gentlemen, what's up? How have the holidays gone and how have they started the year?
Well I hope everyone is well and keep fighting for the dream of winning at roulette, because if it can be achieved.
I continue to do thousands of tests on the dyksexlic and I come to tell you that the first step you have to do, is to discover the intervals that Turbo speaks, because there you will realize that everything Turbo says is completely true and if you can achieve totally flat win, after that you will only have to find the way to play the numbers and use an aggressive progression to make the most of this type of game and sometimes win in less balls and sometimes in longer paths due to complications that can Give your own chance.
I'm going to put a session that I just made just playing flat with chips of 25 euros, so you can see that Turbo is a genius and discovered something mathematically winning.
Once you realize what Turbo does, you know you can win each session.

You have a link where we can read about this?

[Herby]

I'm going to put a session that I just made just playing flat with chips of 25 euros, so you can see that Turbo is a genius and discovered something mathematically winning.

Hi PassionRuleta,
If you wanted to post the picture I would be interested to see it.
Thanks

[stringbeanpc]

I'm going to put a session that I just made just playing flat with chips of 25 euros, so you can see that Turbo is a genius and discovered something mathematically winning.

I would like to see that as well, because it would help us all.  Best Regards,

[nottophammer]

You want with the posted graph; the spin file.
The graph is no good without the actual spins.

[Irish88]

There are 4000 balls 26425 of profit in plane with chips of â,¬ 25.

So is your focus on repeats? This entire thread was basically focused on repeats and hot numbers. Now if you read on gambling forums, JEKHB, who used to post here quite a bit and stopped is talking about using Turbos method. Except he is talking about negative standard from deviation. So he says he has been playing the coldest double street from what I can tell. Turbo has been also posting how cold numbers have to come back to average. So which is it? Hot numbers or the other?

[Winner]

I try to send the image and it has not left me for days ...

I’ve seen this graph on VLS forum years ago.

[The General]

So is your focus on repeats? This entire thread was basically focused on repeats and hot numbers. Now if you read on gambling forums, JEKHB, who used to post here quite a bit and stopped is talking about using Turbos method. Except he is talking about negative standard from deviation. So he says he has been playing the coldest double street from what I can tell. Turbo has been also posting how cold numbers have to come back to average. So which is it? Hot numbers or the other?

The trick to making it work is, if it loses betting on the hot numbers, then travel back in time and play it with cold numbers and then post the results.   

[Bigbroben]

I’ve seen this graph on VLS forum years ago.

Amazing how history repeats, then!

Passion, why do you normally post a graph that's clearly a graph file, but now a photo of a screenshot?
It makes me wonder...

[nottophammer]

And where are the numbers

[Winner]

Is about to record the permanence of 14,500 balls, when I finish I send you the numbers.

What’s your point?

[Winner]

There’s not one guy here that can show how to make Living at roulette  other then Steve.

[Steve]

Turbo has been also posting how cold numbers have to come back to average

No they dont. If you start at a standard deviation of 2, from this point with new spins, the standard deviation could be +2,0,-2 or whatever. Expecting a balance is super old fallacy.

Its statements like yours above that show you dont even know the basics. Its not opinion. Its verifiable fact.

Focus on just on this one point, tell us why numbers must bounce back. Please.

[Irish88]

No they dont. If you start at a standard deviation of 2, from this point with new spins, the standard deviation could be +2,0,-2 or whatever. Expecting a balance is super old fallacy.

Its statements like yours above that show you dont even know the basics. Its not opinion. Its verifiable fact.

Focus on just on this one point, tell us why numbers must bounce back. Please.

I did say Turbo has been posting that. I wouldn't play that way. I can't explain to you why some people think it might be a worthwhile method. Would I play that way? No. Do I think cold numbers have to come back to average? I have no clue, and I don't really care to be honest. I play on live wheels and just try to predict what section of the wheel is going to hit. That's really the only way I play. I have good days and I have days where I lose. My point was how this thread all 237 pages was focused on repeats and hot numbers. All of sudden Turbo and one of his followers  is saying they are playing cold numbers. I myself was asking the question to Sergio and his graph. Hot or cold numbers, which is it? Seems a strange departure after all his talk about repeats, hot numbers, Vaddi and Dyksexlic, now its cold numbers?