@ turbo

[nottophammer]

Notto, seriously.

YES

[Steve]

think ive only had my normal name on there

Denial. I wonder why.

for a guy who claims he cant read or log an mpr game i find that anyone on here if steve doesnt get his own way he always can use anything you do which for some could be a privacy  encroachment or trust encroachment of the main owner against you...so fXCK YOU STEVE  i think was apt

I've explained the mpr logs many times. It's nothing like video recording sessions of RS. Perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to see through Turbo's excuses. Sorry I don't believe in fairies. Why make it personal?

Turbo has the HG and never loses. Now he is deliberately losing to mess with us. He can take the #1 position anytime he wants. A system only needs to beat a few spins. Larger tests are irrelevant. Unicorns are real. Earth is flat. 

[6th-sense]

Denial. I wonder why.

I've explained the mpr logs many times. It's nothing like video recording sessions of RS. Perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to see through Turbo's excuses. Sorry I don't believe in fairies. Why make it personal?

Turbo has the HG and never loses. Now he is deliberately losing to mess with us. He can take the #1 position anytime he wants. A system only needs to beat a few spins. Larger tests are irrelevant. Unicorns are real. Earth is flat. 

No denial..stop cherry picking bits of quotes..as I said apart from fxck you Steve I thought I only used my normal name..also asked you if I had any others as it would be interesting..
That’s not denial?
Also post whatever you want about any accounts as you well know I don’t play On mpr..how many spins or even a days did I actually play?..
Don’t twist things to suit yourself..
Pick your dummy back up ..get over turbo and get some professional therapy if you can’t manage on your own ..
So post away I’m not in denial over anything

[Firefox]

Slight aside, does anyone know why people try to game or cheat these fun roulette forums. Is it just for the sport, or maybe a prelude to selling a system? Surely it's the real life results that count, either in B&M or proper cash game in an online casino.

[Steve]

Well I know if I had the HG, I wouldnt waste months of my time on rigged games like parx. Turbo said many times he does it to convince people his system works. For ages he denied parx was rigged. And more recently, he claimed RS was realistic.  Why would he choose verifiably rigged games as proof? Hmm. The whole situation is just crap, and the result is wasting people's time for his kicks. Some gullible people just still dont get it. Its their time & money.

[luckyfella]

Slight aside, does anyone know why people try to game or cheat these fun roulette forums. Is it just for the sport, or maybe a prelude to selling a system? Surely it's the real life results that count, either in B&M or proper cash game in an online casino.

Good question.

My question is - must everyone who post nice winning RS graphs automatically make him a cheat or scammer ?

General and Taotie tauts MPR as the gold standard of proof.

We are brainwashed to believe such shit.

Final question for General, now that RS plugs the cheat loophole, do RS graphs receive better legitimacy from you ? Or status quo ?

Sorry, this silly denial of legitimacy cut no ice.

[Steve]

General and Taotie tauts MPR as the gold standard of proof.
We are brainwashed to believe such shit.

Even more brainwashed to believe turbo never loses (except when he means to, just to mess with us), Parx and RS were chosen because they were realistic, repeaters is the secret to the HG, and all verifiable math from educated professionals is wrong. Some would call it delusion.

Final question for General, now that RS plugs the cheat loophole, do RS graphs receive better legitimacy from you ? Or status quo ?

If the loophole was corrected yes. But to make RS a better game, a verifiable source of proper RNG would need to be used - like MPR.

MPR is just an interface, with normal roulette payouts. The core of the game is the quality of spins (random.org), and immutable results decided server-side (like a real online casino), and the option for anyone to verify the spins haven't been tampered with. Does it mean MPR is the gold standard? Actually Id consider it at least the bare minimum. Although you cant verify the legitimacy of spins even at real casinos.

The real gold standard is a real casino with real money. MPR is just a game, albeit with proper rng spins.

But even with real casinos and money, you need to understand statistical relevance and variance - concepts way beyond some people's minds, despite simple concepts. Poor Notto cant think beyond his 9 spins.

It is fascinating how some of you attack everything and everyone who dares point out why approaches don't work. It's a conspiracy. It's time some of you wake up. You're really thickheaded. The world of mathematicians and statisticians is not out to get you. Some of you dont even understand primary school math - literally. It doesnt affect anyone but you, so take or leave the advice. Don't laugh at flat earthers. You're one of them.

[Rulet]

Has anyone tried this method successfully?

[nottophammer]

Big Money


1st colour matrix; Spin 19, +60
Now see how many R1’s; spin 29, +137

#22 last spin

Repeats are alive

[nottophammer]

Big M you try; #33 last spin


Spin 18 colour matrix +70
wait for spin 20; now bet all R1’s; spin 26 +75; only 5 units for repeats. Still a win is a win

Take rows of black like that all day long

[nottophammer]

[Rulet]

Hi all,
Turbo's system tested to the limit
As he said in one post " Losing is not possible"
Cheers Turbo a true genius

[Steve]

Sorry, I can't tell if you're joking or serious.

[bigmoney]

Steve put up your results for session of your pocket computer

[Steve]

Bigmoney, are you having a stab at me for my comment about Rulet's results? You might want to research what's available for my "pocket computers" before having a stab at me. But it's not relevant here.

His chart is almost all red, and right at the end he gets lucky and ends up slightly in the green. And that's supposed to be proof of something? Like I said, I wasn't sure if he was joking or not.