@ turbo

[Rulet]

Carried on playing few spins more as the distribution has been so even for a long time....

Knew there had to be more repeaters..

A higher new balance..

[Rulet]

A few spins more.....

4095 units up....

[Rulet]

Can anyone show me a better system?

Steve?

Are you there?

[Rulet]

I know it was just luck

Anyway, just finished watching the footy

off to bed
where is the yawn icon?

[Madi]

Can anyone show me a better system?

Steve?

Are you there?

There is only one person who can do better.

Doctor uncle.
Who can vaccinate for infection. Incredibly smart, good looking, handsome, casino killer , a living fear for all pit boss across the world, a salvage wreker and DON of all forums.

[The General]

There is only one person who can do better.

Doctor uncle.
Who can vaccinate for infection. Incredibly smart, good looking, handsome, casino killer , a living fear for all pit boss across the world, a salvage wreker and DON of all forums.

Psst... I'm right here. 

[Roulettebeater]

Repeaters ? No thx !

Casinos have many tricks up their sleeve: one of them is providing “scorecards” that let you keep track of what color or number comes up on the roulette wheel while you are at the table. Casinos do this to perpetuate the idea of the gambler’s fallacy -- the idea that since red has come up a bunch of times in a row that black is more likely to come up next.

This is total nonsense. Mathematically each roll of the ball is independent of the next and red could come up 100 times in a row. The chance black would be next is the same regardless.

So give up on repeaters

[Rulet]

Yeah you’re right

I had a massive losing session this morning.
It doesn’t work, it must’ve been luck all along afterall
Back to the drawing board

Sorry for misleading people

Take care everyone

[Anastasius]

I converted to cold numbers today

Its not repeaters defo haha

[Anastasius]

I bet u if u could bet 0.0000000000001 cents  everyone here would marty red or black after 10 misses lol

[Still]

Yeah you’re right

I had a massive losing session this morning.
It doesn’t work, it must’ve been luck all along afterall
Back to the drawing board

Sorry for misleading people

Take care everyone

I read Turbo's "Back to the basics" thread and what i could tell he was trying to jump on board the minority of numbers that will float to the top and defy the gravity of the house edge.  He suggested that in 1000 random streams, a small percent, like 13%, would be in the green after x spins, regardless the house edge. This is indeed a truism.  The quest: how to identify these and jump on board.  Well, the logical way is to increase bets on anything that repeats.  The very tricky part is for how long to ride, how many to ride, when to cut the laggards, how much to increase. 

I had this idea many years ago. Seems like the obvious thing to do.  Like betting on a horse after the horse race has already begun.  Just bet on the lead horse, or in this case, increase bets on the lead horses as they run down the track.  I could not make it work with just one horse, so i was intrigued how turbo might make it work using several horses and some timing tricks.  Using one horse, you could switch to the new lead horse as it overtakes the old leader.  I found there was a cost to each switch, so it's not as simple as just jumping on the new lead horse. 

Anyway, i don't think i exhausted all ideas as i ran out of time for research.  So i was open minded, interested to see how turbo may have made this work, sort of averaging all the lead horses. 

If you feel it failed, then why don't you share all the details of your adaptation of turbo's basic method, so that the group might help salvage it, if it is salvageable at all.

 

[Steve]

Just bet on the lead horse, or in this case, increase bets on the lead horses as they run down the track

The whole theory is wrong.

In terms of roulette, the horse that's winning is reset every time you bet. So it doesn't matter who's "winning" at the time.

A horse could stop running completely. It could keep running, but slow down. You just don't know. Sometimes you'll be right, sometimes wrong. And ultimately there is NO CHANGE IN ACCURACY. YOUR BETS ARE AS ACCURATE AS RANDOM.

It's just another example of holes in turbo's claims.

[Steve]

Steve I challenge you to show one chart of a winning session by you
Can u do it?

I can and have shown a lot more than charts. Includes live public demos, live webcam demos (and showing when and where the ball will fall, before it happens), and even recordings of real players winning in casinos.  I can even lend my computers free for testing, give free trials, test on ANY wheel etc. There's more, there's no doubt, but it's not relevant here. Anyone who does proper research would know computers are by far most effective. But sure they're not for everyone. Who cares. They just happen to be my choice because I sit from home and watch my players win with hidden cameras.

Yeah you’re right

I had a massive losing session this morning.
It doesn’t work, it must’ve been luck all along afterall
Back to the drawing board

Sorry for misleading people

Take care everyone

Like many other players, I've been where you are many times before. If you keep going, you'll end up concluding you must change the accuracy of predictions, and properly test to see if you;re doing that. Dont waste your time testing on "play for fun" games. Test statistically significant amount of spins, reputable spins (not RS as you dont know the source), and use automated testing software like RX. Dont waste time with meaningless charts showing short term results.

You dont need to use my preferred methods. Just try something NEW, and dont waste time with methods we already know fail.

[Steve]

Carefully read link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/ and save yourself a lot of time.

[Proofreaders2000]

I'd like to add-beware of "All In" style bets (like what the martingale
does) or anything where you have to put a lot of money on the table.

Money management example:

Sixty units total bankroll-you could do a line bet. 
Stop on a win or after six units lost.  Either way end session.