@ turbo

[Steve]

Rulet, a few days ago you were adamant repeaters was the secret, and everyone who said otherwise was just stupid. You had a few charts showing you won .. play money.

Then you lost and learned better. Or so we thought. Now you flipped and have a new holy grail secret. A few days later. You've really got a lot to learn. You prefer the hard way but thats ok, I did that too once.

No the world is not out to get you. We are not naysayers. We just live in the real world.

[Firefox]

All these graphs of 200 spins are meaningless.

See attached. Graph of 1000 spins flat betting.... wins. The holy grail!

Crank it up to 5000 spins. Loses. The law of large numbers.

Over just 200 spins anything can happen!

[Rulet]

I am playing games with you matey
Could be repeaters, precognition or hot sectors....
You will never know
Here I played flat bet, since you were complaining about progression..
5 pounds flat bet....
See it works flatbet too, but it's up to you
Progression gets you there quicker.

[Rulet]

Stop when you are up then.
No ones telling you to play 5000 spins...

Rinse and repeat...

I told you there are no mechanical systems that win all the time.
Bet adjustment is needed to continue winning over 5000 spins..
You can't have static bet selection and expect to win all the time...
That doesn't exist
Stop searching for that, you are wasting your time.....
Dynamic has to be
Hot sectors for example, changes all the time...
It is your time I guess, yours to waste

[Firefox]

Again only 150 spins     

Playing one session of 5000 is the same as playing 100 of 50.

No good stopping when you are up, as sometimes you will never be up. You will lose from the start.

The only point of posting 5000 is to show in the long term, over 100 sessions of 50, you will lose.

It's simply cutting to the chase and saving time.

[Rulet]

My 10000 units in 1000 spins challange.....

I have had to change bet selection several times to keep winning

If I had stayed with the same numbers, I would have lost 10000 units

Take my word for it, static doesn't work

But noones testing properly

All you do is, select bets, run 5000 spins, lose, then say this system doesn't work

[Rulet]

You hope and pray, you get lucky and win something..

Instead, you could monitor what's happening and interfere and change your bets..

Hey look, this is why people are losing, static bets, not enough tracking, the wheel has moved on from their original bets. Maybe it takes 1000 spins but then next 1000 spins are losing.
Why didn't you do something about it?
Because you are trying to automate it, doesn't work.

[Steve]

I am playing games with you matey
Could be repeaters, precognition or hot sectors....
You will never know

I addressed all those options. You already said what you were playing anyway. But thats not the only point. Your short-term charts, especially with fun money, are meaningless.

Stop when you are up then.
No ones telling you to play 5000 spins...

You still dont understand. Imagine 500 players all playing just 10 spins. Short term is better, right? So everyone should win. Again go back to the page I suggested you read. If you dont understand it, you'll keep chasing your tail.

But noones testing properly
All you do is, select bets, run 5000 spins, lose, then say this system doesn't work

How's that better than testing 5,000 spins then saying the system works?

Good luck Rulet. You dont appear to be listening or willing to learn.

[Rulet]

I guess I could do a 50000 units in 5000 spins.
Something for the future.
But how many hours do I have to play, 5000 spins?

I might do it, but not soon...
You would then say only 5000 spins, I bet it loses if you play 10000
But nothing changes, the system is still the same, can you identify the hot sectors?
If you can do it 1000 spins, you can do it 5000 spins.
Who in the right mind plays the same numbers or bet selection for 5000 spins?
Gamblers, I guess, that's what u are

[Steve]

You've got no idea. Good luck.

[Firefox]

If you have an advantage in bet selection you will win long term. Hot sectors can translate to a dealer based method which can gain an advantage under some conditions. Yes the sectors do change dynamically, but there are many other factors to consider such as rotor speed, fall off and scatter. You can't just blindly bet sectors. So you may have an advantage. Who knows, you haven't really described anything which would give confirmation one way or the other.

[Rulet]

And I won't in the future either, rotor speed, dealer signature?

Joking aren't you? Comical, all fallacies

No wonder you are still searching for a winning system.....

People even struggle with computers to do all that and you can do by just observing?

Good luck to you......

One rule, play continuosly, dynamic bets.....

Stop when you are ahead.....

Rinse and repeat

[Steve]

Rulet, you've gone from really ignorant, to downright stupid.  And even worse, you have just hurt every AP and computer player's feelings.

You just stick with your hot sectors with RNG, and we'll stick with our own fallacies about physics, reality, and the only methods that concern casinos.

You've really lost it now.  You're on a completely different level of knowledge.

[Firefox]

He's not hurt my feelings. I'm not searching for a winning system.

And I don't always stop when I'm ahead. I continue if conditions are good. I'm more likely to stop when losing or if conditions are bad.

So, I'm playing a different game for which he doesn't have  a handle on the parameters.

[Bebediktus3]

I guess I could do a 50000 units in 5000 spins.
Something for the future.

You play with RX do charts posts them here how all is good, why then you not go to the casino and not become millionaire?