@ turbo

[Roulettebeater]

can anyone explain why this thread is still alive after 269 pages?
this is a contraproductive sign!

the method "tUrbo" has been proved hundred of times as a loser method, despite that many still feeding this thread with lots of rubbish!

[Steve]

Its because some people are really dumb.
Thats the truth.

[BASTI]

Regulated casinos have their RNG properly developed, tested and certified. And even the payouts are usually audited. Fair means it does not appear to have flaws that make it predictable. That includes testing for repeaters, hot numbers etc. Those are standard tests.

I wonder why all ( ok almost all ) online casinos are based on malta, guersney, gibraltar ,etc,.....( favorable tax regime  for sure isnt not only thing )......

[Steve]

Yes they have looser laws. And of course the governments get side benefits. Gambling licenses are like alcohol and tobacco licenses: the lawful right to screw people.

Serious players rarely bother with online casinos. Theres many reasons.

But a typical properly licensed casino is better regulated. It doesnt mean they arent sometimes corrupt. Corruption follows big money. I know of many cases of corruption. I reported some but the police didnt give a shit, or matters were beyond them. How the world really works is not quite what you may think

[Rulet]

What is the difference between MPR and RX or RS?


Now, I never played on MPR ....
But Turbo raised serious issues about it, stringing results from different tables (20 reds in a row + another 20 reds)
40 reds in a row? Do you use an algorithm to dispatch numbers randomly from a pool?
Anyway who wants to play on rng?
Why don't use get numbers from random.org to use in RX?
That's what I do, but I like the graphics on RS more slick....

I am working on Vaddis method at the moment..

I know it is only 336 spins....

[Rulet]

His system is hit and run when you increase your balance..

Come back 10 spins later start again, little and often

You might see some flats in the chart, as he puts it "Take a break for a few spins, then come back"

Flat bet, so money rises gradually

[Roulettebeater]

What is the difference between MPR and RX or RS?


Now, I never played on MPR ....
But Turbo raised serious issues about it, stringing results from different tables (20 reds in a row + another 20 reds)
40 reds in a row? Do you use an algorithm to dispatch numbers randomly from a pool?
Anyway who wants to play on rng?
Why don't use get numbers from random.org to use in RX?
That's what I do, but I like the graphics on RS more slick....

I am working on Vaddis method at the moment..

I know it is only 336 spins....

if turbo is real, he wouldn''t have left the forum!
you are apparently still dreaming... Turbo's method is one of the many weird Illusions that will Challenge Your Brain!

[Rulet]

He realised he was wasting his time with people like you.

That's why he left

[Steve]

But Turbo raised serious issues about it, stringing results from different tables (20 reds in a row + another 20 reds)

Turbo made constant excuses to avoid tests on a realistic simulator.

Two problems with the excuse you highlighted:

1. He constantly claimed the more random the better. Stringing results from multiple wheels makes it even more random.

2. Even when we changed to pure RNG from random.org, he made other equally poor excuses.

Do you use an algorithm to dispatch numbers randomly from a pool?

As per the forum vote, we now use 100% numbers from random.org.

Anyway who wants to play on rng?

Your hero, Turbo. According to him, spins are predictable thanks to random. And the more random, the better.

That's what I do, but I like the graphics on RS more slick....

RS is primarily entertainment to sell advertising, with an unknown source of spins. MPR is entertainment too, but I don't run ads there, and it a verifiably fair place to test and compare system results. And that's why the people with big mouths and bad systems avoid it. Or they dump the losing accounts and show only winning accounts.

He realised he was wasting his time with people like you.
That's why he left

Actually too many people saw through him. That's why he left both here and GF.

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, Turbo was and is a liar, just out for attention. It's all in this thread. He wasn't the first and wont be the last person who's full of shit. You need only basic understanding to see it.  He lured only the uneducated and inexperienced with garbled nonsense, play money winnings with cheating and clearly rigged games, and black and white "duck and cover" videos.

[Rulet]

I rememeber the complaints, cheats on MPR.....

That's why he didn't want to play there?

The problems with the software, glitches, phew.. I dodged a bullet there, would've given up on rulette if I played on it.

Turbo rules, but the problem with his system is the large drawdowns, need big bankroll to withstand...

Now with Vaddi on the other hand drawdowns are more manageble....

Manual testing is required to figure out his system

Carried on....

[Rulet]

Vaddi rules too.........

[Rulet]

Vaddi mad scientist?

Predicting what numbers are going to hit.

I don't mean repeats, non hit numbers

He's mad.

[Steve]

Rulet, days ago you claimed repeaters dont work. Turbo might disagree.

Every software has bugs initially. More recently, a massive problem was found with RS enabling anyone to never lose. And when it was fixed, Turbo vanished.

One of Turbo's complaints about MPR was I maintain logs to fix bugs and catch cheats. Every online casino has such debugging logs. It would be very difficult to reverse engineer a system with the logs. Turbo never had a problem with MPR.... until he started losing, and made lots of excuses. Then he ran to RS, where all sessions can be replayed by the admin like a video. A little bit backwards, perhaps?

It has all been said before. You either havent read this thread, choose to ignore it all, or arent too bright.

I'm wasting my time with you. I dont think you're playing with a full deck.

[Roulettebeater]

@rulet.

if you are so proud of turbo's method, why dont you go right now and make money with it?

i guess the answer is clear..
wake up!

[snafu]

Quote (selected)
Vaddi mad scientist?

Predicting what numbers are going to hit.

I don't mean repeats, non hit numbers

He's mad.

Ok then can you just spill it out?? This is just a waste of time - you say it works, others do not agree.
Spill it out, all can test and make a conclusion... why waste time on this and "vibrate air"