ROTT

[nottophammer]

Doctor Sudoku
Well this you might as well not bother looking at   
Yesterday 65 minutes using .25p units +31.25
85 spins in total, but its watching the 1 Trotity trot, trotity trot in 3 games, perhaps like Winkel with his multiple trackers.
CLUE doc in total 85 spins

[nottophammer]

Before you give your vote would you like a spin by spin evaluation of this trot 

[nottophammer]

This should be in 10 against 10, RG's topic, where sissors shows it lost, but lets not clogg it up,
So here are 60 spins showing countback, does it need an explanation?

[nottophammer]

So what are you looking at as it seems some don't get it.
What you see are checkpoints for non-hit. Here we see that an avg of 15.7 came in spins 11-40, to do this add 15  rounded down from 15.7 to the non-hit that came in spins 1-10, then you'll see how many of the 15 non-hits came by spin 40.
Now if you accept the avg of 15,0x's in spins 11-40, think about it, hot numbers/repeats, you're expecting 15 repeats from the 30 spins, but dont forget the 0x's from spins 1-10 all potential repeats. Is method WTF not catching the repeats in spins 21-30, to help see this add countback to the record sheet.

In the reply above  spins 1-10 it had 9,0x's, add the avg of 15, means 24 non-hit could show by spin 40, and as you can see it got 24,0x's by spin 40, in fact they came fast as countback shows. If you rounded down 29.75, 0x's for 60 spins, there at spin 60 is 29,0x's.

Mr Taotie would stat to bet remaining 9,8,7,6,5 and wins 1st spin     ROTT 

[nottophammer]

Now whilst wait for the hospital to be done, i visit corals and w.hill +80 units just watching the trot.
If you want i'll post the sheets, but why do i need, i know its truth, just learn ROTT, just explained it in KTF

[nottophammer]

See countback add 15 to the 9 non-hit from 1st 10 spins 15+9=24
Is 15 in Andre file in topic Solving the "Holy Grail" Flatbet Secrets/Together we are stronger! The avg for spins 11-40 and also 29 for 60 spins.

[nottophammer]

Got bored with just doing repeats so i just watched the Riddle Of The Trot, easy

[Gzgzbee]

Notto,

Can you explain how this works?

[nottophammer]

Ok GZ
If you look in like maestro said, 2nd reply theres part of collected data for non-hit numbers, the column for the 26th non-hit means betting last or remaining 12#'s from the starting 37.

We're not worried about like maestro said, because we're just watching the spins from spin1, but i dont attempt any bets untill 10 spins have come.

Now lets assume the 25th has hit, you have two options 1. bet for 4 spins as the avg to hit is i always round up as this figure is below .5 math would have you round it down.  The known max at this point in time is 27 spins and has happened once.
option 2 would be too wait 4 spins to see if it misses the avg to hit, if it does how many times can you bet those 12 remaining? well i could bet for 9 spins in bookies, so if waited 4 spins, the 12 remaining could be bet for 9 spins getting to spin 13, which means by waiting you might have  lost 4 times.

Something else is how fast have the previous non-hit, hit. Now you need countback for that and accept the avg for spins 11-40 where bets become available on non-hit or repeats, by decisions you make as the spins go along.

Here is the avg to hit for upto the 19th non-hit, they avg to hit in 2 spins, on the R-Sim pic you can see no bets for 10 spins, then i win spins 11 and 12, lose spins 13 and win on spin 14, the avg to hit. I win upto the 18th spin and then bet no more till spin 25,which is betting for a repeat as the 24th spin was the 20th non-hit, so the non-hit have come fast, to fast, it should not really come in untill spin 33/34 to countback, so i bet for next 3 spins the 20 non-hit that are now the 20,1X's and win 3 times, i now stop as the 21st non-hit has missed its avg to hit, the 21st hit on spin 29, now as its still way infront thats the no-hit, i bet the 21;1x's and win twice, i bet again and lose, i add the extra 1x and double the bet and lose, i add the 1x and plus 1 again the units to 3 on each and win, i rebet all again and down chip by 1 unit and win

[nottophammer]

i posted above as it might time out.
It was still bet for repeats as the non-hit where infront to countback.
Here is the sheet the red is an earlier game that wins.
The R-sim is the black its a bit messy but you can see the workings just about. The reason you see 13;+3 is countback has spins 21-30; showing that the 18th non-hit should really came here, not the 21st which should or could have come at spin 35/36, you get the idea.
Any more just ask.

[nottophammer]

GZ or anyone cares to see ROTT
Go to roulette- simulator, look in High score list, the games are on p22 under name of  KTF  rank 214

[nottophammer]

Just played these at R-SIM, its like a game of chess gets you thinking, make decision, remember the non-hit avg.

Both games 8/10 so if you know of countback at 39/40 should or could see 23 non-hit have come.
Are you following 100 days of mort, what does it avg at spin 60, answer 29 non-hit i'd round it to 30 so half the 60 spins would be non-hit,1st game has 30 at spin 52, other 28 at spin 57, made some units so why carry on, just reset.

[nottophammer]

poluvolo, Gzgzbee

Above is a picture of the TROT.
How do i get to see the trot, overtime i built up a data base of games, these 60 spin+ games eventually gave me all 37 non-hit #'s averages, we're not talking 100 games, we're using data from 100's.

Now these averages have gradually been slowing down,
1; The average to hit has not changed in 100's of games


It starts with non-hit 5 upto 37, non-hit 37 is 0; ok, reason #5 is the start is most games start 9/10, games seldom have 5 repeats in 1st 10 spins.
Now look at the avg to hit from non-hit 7 upto non-hit 19, we dont get 1 point something spins, so round it up, becomes 2; 2 spins is average to hit.

So above the 10th non-hit came on spin 10, the 11th non-hit came on spin 12, which is the average to hit 2 spins. We'll carry on, the 16th non-hit we'll discuss later, the 18th hit the average to hit, ok with this.

[nottophammer]

Now lets look at max spins for non-hit numbers.


Now these change, obviously at the start of building the data base the max spins kept changing, but now the data is of a large volume these max spins hardly change, you can't say never as extremes do change.

So non-hit 16 should or should i say hits on average in 2 spins, but we can see here it missed the average to hit, so if you are just watching and recording these spins, seeing its missed its average to hit, it is decision time to think about whether to start betting these 22 remaining numbers, so what is the present known max spins to hit, answer 7 spins, so how many spins with a progression could you bet these remaining 22 numbers, me i could bet for 4 spins in the bookies, so if 7 is known max, i'd say i'll wait 3 spins and then start to bet, and of course it wins, by waiting for 3 spins, my 4 chances to bet would get me to 7th spin, to be ultra safe, as i could only bet 4 times i could wait 4 spins and then bet, but here it came in on its 4th spin, so here you can see why having known averages helps to see the trot.

[nottophammer]

So the above two posts are giving a view on the trot, but the best way to see the actual trot is to use countback.

Now what you members have to remember is i'm working on 40 spins, not the math 37 spins, where people get the Law of the third, but do not worry as countback will show at spin 37/38 if LOTT is going to be correct in saying 24 non-hit numbers will hit in 37 spins and as you can see the 24th non-hit has come within 37 spins, so LOTT was right,

But where should or lets say could those 24 non-hit numbers hit.

Add countback, been told before by me, so here we go again, what is the 1st 10 spins answer 10/10, so from Known data i know on average in spins 11-40, 30 spins that on average 15 non-hit come.
So you write on the sheet at 2 spins intervals like on the above sheet in the grey shadeing.
Here we can see the assumed positions of the 15 non-hit numbers to come (10+15=25) and 25 non-hit have come.

Theres more but is it worth me showing?