Idea based on streets

[RouletteGhost]

Very simple and easy method I began testing

I have tested 6 pages of zumma

I am trying to find a method with a hit rate that is safe to use with progression

just to make a few dollars here and there

method:

-when you sit at table you can use history board for last 6, or start when you arrive.
-wait for 6 unique streets to show, does not have to be in a row there may be some repeating streets while you wait, thats ok, we just want 6 streets
-once we have those 6 streets, we bet those 6 streets. it is an EC bet
-i tested it by betting those 6 streets, then on a loss, double up until a win

yes i know, trying the same thing over and over blah blah

I tested with marty, yes marty.....in 5 pages never went past 5 steps

i am sure there is a RFH, certain of it. no HG here

but may be cool to pick up a few units when bored, or passing by a table

[nottophammer]

Have you learnt nothing from the canon method 

[RouletteGhost]

yes sir lol

[RouletteGhost]

you may say "just bet any 6 streets randomly in this way and the results will be the same"

tried it

results are not the same

betting the last 6 unique works better....has to do with the idea that having 12 unique streets in a row is not gonna happen

[RouletteGhost]

this is something id do while walking through the casino and want to place a quick few bets then go have lunch

[Willie]

Tried this on double zero RNG
50 spins, max losses 5 in a row
20 wins ie. +120 if played with 1u
BR for a six step marty- Approx 400 units
But if goes beyond that then it's a bust

[Roulettedevil]

Tried this many times but, opposite streets, anyway here's the result if played said way, yesterdays spins.

[RouletteGhost]

Roulettedevil, Thanks and your test it looks like it got scary at one point that's why I would just play it quick for a couple of units

Wiggy be careful with RNg

[RouletteGhost]

Devil if you played those streets this way you would have had less prog

[INTERCEPTOR]

Very simple and easy method I began testing

I have tested 6 pages of zumma

I am trying to find a method with a hit rate that is safe to use with progression

Thanks RG but I don't believe in progression.

[mogul397]

So is this the "same old same old"?  EC betting with the same results?

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18368.45  Reply # 54



On a more serious note, I decided to play this live today. Using the
50 cent inside bets I bet $1.50 on the 3 choiced. And tracked it.

I made like $10, and it was seeming very good. Flat bet. And I stopped
betting and recorded. I have the paper here in front of me.

At a certain point I got a lot of losses on paper.  7 in a row including one zero.
Mentally and emotionally it seemed a little sour.

I've been out all night and just got back looking it over. Overall I counted the
wins and losses. I basically got 25 wins and 25 losses. Including 3 losses from zeros.

But my point is that I'm not sure how I would play this with a progression of any
kind with confidence.  Even with an actual even split, the distribution was the thing
that was killing me.  Good bet selection just didn't cover it (unless I just bet
blind and was happy breaking even).

[RouletteGhost]

This is no superior HG

i never went past 5 steps in progression within 6 pages of zumma

so for me that makes the cut for a quick hit and run bet for a few units

i also play a double dozen/double column strategy with a 4 step progression....i saved myself the bashing so i never posted it lol

[mogul397]

HG aside, for a stellar set of results, 7 losses in a row would put you on the ropes.
A general observation for what results maybe in using a progression.

Often we think about the "killer streak". Well that streak can be embedded I a good session.
Or there can be a real streak, which will knock you out of the park.

Bet selection aside, I think that the mm is the thing that is the problem to be addresses.

I remember decades ago saying to someone in a chat room, "It's not WHAT happens that
we don't know. It's what ORDER it will happen".

It's nice to play a method that just feeds you profit. But maybe that's not the correct thing
to do. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

How close are you to the casino?

[bleep24]

There is a 59 step prog. for 1 Double street but you need 2000 units if betting 1 unit.   I have checked it against about 30 spin sets from Dublinbet posted on this forum.  Every set won in the end but there were some highs on the way.   What I did notice was that if before playing you check the history board and identify a D/S with 2 or 3 hits within first 10/12 spins then this is a d/S that is hot and it went on to win without any long prog.

Another thing that I have been trying (yes it has been done before sometime ago) is betting all 3 E/C`s to repeat previous.  Flat betting.  E/C`s should work out  about 50/50 but what I have noticed is that is can vary up to 10 units either way and will swing from one way to the other.  Keep playing until you are (say) 10 units in front then jump off.  Worst that I have had is break even.  No stress.  You do not have to work out what to bet.  Or bet opposite to last or alternate: it`s your choice.   Is differential betting appropriate for this (has progression)

Brian

[RouletteGhost]

HG aside, for a stellar set of results, 7 losses in a row would put you on the ropes.
A general observation for what results maybe in using a progression.

Often we think about the "killer streak". Well that streak can be embedded I a good session.
Or there can be a real streak, which will knock you out of the park.

Bet selection aside, I think that the mm is the thing that is the problem to be addresses.

I remember decades ago saying to someone in a chat room, "It's not WHAT happens that
we don't know. It's what ORDER it will happen".

It's nice to play a method that just feeds you profit. But maybe that's not the correct thing
to do. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

How close are you to the casino?

Of course 7 losses in a row will happen at some point

This isn't a long term method

It's for a quick few units before lunch