Crash and Burn

[ignatus]

In my mind i think this is an insane bet, that will not work, but then i tried, and to my suprise it worked. Lady Luck? I don't know...play at your own risk, you've been warned!  This was just an idea,

Trigger: Wait for the last 2 Doublestreets hit, to hit (3) times in a row. THEN when you got the trigger bet the other 4 DS, (zero is ignored)

Progression: Double TWICE for each loss, until hit (most i've seen so far is 3 losses in a row)

Bankroll; 200u minimum playing with 1u bets-

First tests was played with 5u bets,

[edved77]

Just tested 200 spins and, like you, only had LLL max.  Seems quite consistent.  48 wins - nice.

[ignatus]

Just tested 200 spins and, like you, only had LLL max.  Seems quite consistent.  48 wins - nice.

Yes, perhaps could work,(?) if you're prepared to lose now and then, with a set stoploss ....extreme events do happen, yes

[RouletteGhost]

The trigger is when the past two DS hit three times in a row? Little confused thanks

[ignatus]

The trigger is when the past two DS hit three times in a row? Little confused thanks

Let's say DS 1,3 hits, now if any of DS 1 or 3 hits again, -->that's a total of 3 hits. (Trigger)

[RouletteGhost]

Got it

[bleep24]

Hi Ignatus,
I am going to start calling you prodigous Ignatus.  I do not know how you manage to keep coming up with so many varied systems and some of them are very good ideas.

Back to your current one.  I have just seen a 4x loss (not playing fortunately) so they can happen.  Because the win rate on this is soooooo good and vast majority of wins come on first spin you could just play first spin and stop.   If it works out 6 x 2 units won versus 1 x 4 unit lost I would be more comfortable playing higher unit values so it would work out about the same overall without those heart stopping moments.  1 2 4 8 x 4.  = 60 units total stake.  Not a lot but everyone has to decide their risk tolerance.   After a bit playing of this it will become evident how many times on average it goes to 2, 3 or more and can adjust. You could play just the one spin and if lost wait until next trigger to double up etc.)

Once again,   Thanks and good luck and keep up the good work.  (Do you sit in your bath like Archimedes and come up with these ideas?)

Brian



 

[ignatus]

Thanks and good luck and keep up the good work.  (Do you sit in your bath like Archimedes and come up with these ideas?)

Guess i have too much spare time, and i love roulette!

Progression is crazy to double up 2 times, but that was because of my laziness, if you have better ideas for progression goahead, since, as you said hitrate seems to be good!

Cheers

[Willie]

Hi Ignatus,
I am going to start calling you prodigous Ignatus.  I do not know how you manage to keep coming up with so many varied systems and some of them are very good ideas.

Back to your current one.  I have just seen a 4x loss (not playing fortunately) so they can happen.  Because the win rate on this is soooooo good and vast majority of wins come on first spin you could just play first spin and stop.   If it works out 6 x 2 units won versus 1 x 4 unit lost I would be more comfortable playing higher unit values so it would work out about the same overall without those heart stopping moments.  1 2 4 8 x 4.  = 60 units total stake.  Not a lot but everyone has to decide their risk tolerance.   After a bit playing of this it will become evident how many times on average it goes to 2, 3 or more and can adjust. You could play just the one spin and if lost wait until next trigger to double up etc.)

Once again,   Thanks and good luck and keep up the good work.  (Do you sit in your bath like Archimedes and come up with these ideas?)

Brian

I second that bleep24.
Ignatus would probably get the world record for coming up with most roulette systems 

[Willie]

bleep your 1,2,4,8 x 4 bet plan won't work because as per the system you have to double twice on each loss else you will be in a loss even on a win