Silly column strategy

[RouletteGhost]

I was sitting here reading some of flatinos methods

I came across a double column method of his

after testing it I realized after columns 2 and 3 followed one another they were likely to hit again within 3 spins...

so i tested against some american zumma

I will post my results

what i did was whenever column 2 and 3 hit after one another, i would bet on both again that they would hit within 3 spins with a 3 step progression.

on a win i would wait for column 1 or a 0/00 to come and wait for 2 and 3 to follow eachother again before continuing as i only aimed for 1 win

ABC represents 123. The losses are red, the greens are a win...all wins within 3 attempts

0
A
A
0
B
C   trigger
B   +1
C
A
C
A
C
A
B
C trigger
A
A
B   +1
0
A
B
B
B
A
A
A
C
A
C
B  trigger
B   +1
A
A
B
B
A
B
0
A
A
B
A
C
B trigger
B   +1
C
A
A
A
B
A
0
B
B
0
B
A
A
B
B
A
A
C
C
B trigger
B   +1
C
A
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
0
C
C
A
A
A

[mogul397]

I get it.

Is that the only combo of columbs that it works on?
My first quick test is OK.

[RouletteGhost]

I call it silly because there is absolutely no reason why this would win long long long term

Im a hit and run guy.

This fits that bill

So save the multi thousand spins for another method

[mogul397]

I think that's where I've been at. With a toolkit surrounding
NLE and such.

Looking and thinking about it, when I look over results, it
is like seeing a new set of 2 dozen setting up, and playing it
for that one hit. Not endlessly for more and more.

It may work for other combos if you look for them like that.

So it may not be that "silly".

[RouletteGhost]

I likdon't this for airball. Trigger s can take a bit

$10 bets

$300 bankroll for the day

3 step prog. Win or lose bring money you don't mind losing just in case

[RouletteGhost]

I'm drunk

I love my roulette peeps

[mogul397]

Not sure of the order of this thing.

Did you contrive to go, get drunk, and now you're gone?
Drunk to soften the 27 unit loss?

I like the method, but not sure chasing it that way is wise.
I'm liking the +/- 1 thing.

[Turner]

I'm drunk

I love my roulette peeps

Im having a dry January 

Looks like a wheat beer (the pic)

[RouletteGhost]

It's a micro brew

A double IPA with juice

[DoctorSudoku]

I likdon't this for airball. Trigger s can take a bit

$10 bets

$300 bankroll for the day

3 step prog. Win or lose bring money you don't mind losing just in case

Interesting method based on an interesting observation. The 3 step progression is the only major problem with this -- I am assuming you are using  the standard 1 3 9 progression. Right?

[mogul397]

I'd be more inclined to play just the 1st spin after the trigger and
if a loss, continue with additional triggers.

And it's funny. As usual, I am drawn to the notion of playing that
single other dozen instead.

How'd you do?

[DoctorSudoku]

The original method as outlined by Rich is a two column strategy for the American double zero wheel.

I guess you can test the alternate single column strategy of betting on Column 1, but I have to warn you that I have frequently seen Columns 2 and 3 alternate with one another for fairly long stretches.

[mogul397]

Oh, I agree.  Right now I'm hot on playing the last two columbs.
Haven't played it yet.  But test here and there.  I went for a LONG time
playing and testing the last two dozen with the labby. Guess that progression
was just too aggressive. I a stack of 20+ play sheets. Then 3 boners in a row.


I would not chase anything. Spot betting for the difference. (My psychological
bent is that if it might be difficult to hit one of two in 3 spins, it must be
easy to hit the 3rd).

RG must be getting over his hangover before giving a trip report.  (Unless
he lost and is scared).

[mogul397]

Another ridiculous pet peeve I have in my head is that of the difference between the
EC, and the 2-1. It is a difference of 6 numbers. Yet such a great difference in odds,
and possibility of long double dozen streaks compared to the number and length of
EC streaks.

So, thinking about it, if you tend to chance getting 5-6 in a row on an EC, and more often
streaks of 10-20 in a double dozen, who is responsible for it?

Just those 6 numbers?

[RouletteGhost]

Interesting method based on an interesting observation. The 3 step progression is the only major problem with this -- I am assuming you are using  the standard 1 3 9 progression. Right?

yes the standard 1 3 9

$10 chips
$300 bank