Best RouletteForum.cc topic of all-time?

[RouletteGhost]

One of the tweaks

See above

Betting against a unique dozen set such as 231. repeating itself will happen on average once every 220 spins

This is a solidified average as you can see above each unique combo repeat occurs about the same rate

Each unique set repeats roughly 30 times in 60000 spins

Break down the math that equates to every 200 spins expect it

This is great stuff

[Bettingking]

RouletteGhost don't you mean once every 2,000 spins....makes it even better than you thought 

60,000 / 30 = 2,000 / 1 ratio

[RouletteGhost]

Each independent unique dozen sequence repeats roughly 30 times per 60,000 spins

Equates to each sequence repeating once every 2000 spins

There's 9 sequences

2000/9

Once every 220 spins a unique repeats

This is an average

And thanks to raymanz

[RouletteGhost]

60,000 spins

123 123: 31
132 132: 35
213 213: 30
231 231: 30
312 312: 26
321 321: 28
111 111: 23
222 222: 22
333 333: 26

I stay close to that math because they are so similar. 30 is the mark. So it is not coincidence, this is what we can expect

Average is 28 to be exact

[falkor2k15]

Regarding Grassroots and that sequence that RG mentioned:
123123?
I guarantee that this will have equal chance compared to any other 6 digit sequence. Something similar can be said for combinations: they appear at different frequencies but are equivalent in terms of cost vs. payout.

I think by far the best topic ever posted is this one:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15870.0

It's clear that PA is Priyanka - or at least part of the same team - and that he intended the above topic to be read in combination with Random Thoughts. Likewise, if Christians read only the Gospels then they fail to understand the Roman conspiracy to invent Christianity - but if they read the Gospels alongside the Roman propagandist history of the time (Josephus) then the truth becomes all too soberingly clear.

So there are two stages to beating roulette as covered by the aforementioned above two topics:
1) Find a stable bet selection (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.0)
2) Win based on variance (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15870.0)

Both topics were created at the same time in Sep 2015 and both are designed to be read together = Holy Grail.

If I was to extend my topic to the single best ever post then the award would probably go to this:

In a wonderland, a wonderful casino advertise..
========================
"New Roulette RNG Game,

100spins only per game, then reset.

with GUARANTEED FIXED 30 BLACK VERSUS 70 RED.
in any possible permutation!

[30black + 70 red=100spins per game]

The ONLY Rules: U could ONLY bet BLACK!.

and stake any progression, and bet or not bet,

and play anyway as u like!"
===============================



If I come across this wonderful casino,
I could win, every day!

could u win???

[RouletteGhost]

PA is not priyanka. Read beat the wheel on bet selection that is PA

Priyanka is great grandpa

[falkor2k15]

[RouletteGhost]

Ok. Now you are getting crazy

Specifically with these stats is there any way to build a winning method around it

60,000 spins

123 123: 31
132 132: 35
213 213: 30
231 231: 30
312 312: 26
321 321: 28
111 111: 23
222 222: 22
333 333: 26

[mogul397]

let me simplify amk code 4 for everyone

you are betting against the decision 12 spins back

on the EC it would be :

odd/even, high/low, odd/even, high low

so if 12 spins back we had:
ELOL

we would then bet against that and the next bets would be:

OHEH

stop on a win

prog 1 2 4 8

So bet against 12 spins back. Bet against the odd or even, whatever it was. If win start over. If lose bet again 12 spins back this time against the high/low and so on

-12 spins back was odd
-Now bet even
-win start over
-lose, 12 spins back was high
-now bet low
Etc

I want to ask the question "would you believe it?"  But I know you would believe it.

I picked up a random set of results.  Counted out 12 on O/E.

1st 4 were OOEO.  Starting after the 12th spin I have,
OOEO..................

Literally the first thing I picked up.

[RouletteGhost]

You played it wrong.

It's against odd even, high low, odd even, high low

[RouletteGhost]

Mogul you are so quick and have such a desire to find the losing zumma page that you don't even fully understand the bet before testing



For your tests to have any credibility with me whatsoever I will need the zumma page number so I can fact check you

Without the zumma page number I can't trust it

Also one loss doesn't make a strategy bad

So for your tests to have any weight I need page numbers.

So my motto with you is : page number or it didn't happen

Happy hunting

[mogul397]

Mogul you are so quick and have such a desire to find the losing zumma page that you don't even fully understand the bet before testing



For your tests to have any credibility with me whatsoever I will need the zumma page number so I can fact check you

Without the zumma page number I can't trust it

Also one loss doesn't make a strategy bad

So for your tests to have any weight I need page numbers.

So my motto with you is : page number or it didn't happen

Happy hunting

There is no page number. It was from actual data I got on a page this week.
Good motto though. You should know me well enough that I list page numbers
when applicable.

I have no zumma page numbers for my own real play.

Maybe "mogul numbers".

Nice try.

[nottophammer]

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16705.0

[mogul397]

There is no page number. It was from actual data I got on a page this week.
Good motto though. You should know me well enough that I list page numbers
when applicable.

I have no zumma page numbers for my own real play.

Maybe "mogul numbers".

Nice try.

BTW, the reason this happens is that I ACTUALLY GO and ACTUALLY PLAY.
So I have those results. Not sure what (other than zumma) that you use for
all your systems and theories.  But you  don't seem to actually go, and if
all else that you have to use is zumma then you ate looking in the mirror.

[RouletteGhost]

Any test you do for any of us to take it serious we need page numbers from zumma or photos of the live wheel history board

Need to fact check