mpr random

[Madi]

Am i doing any mistake? Is it the one in apples game center if i m not wrong?

[Steve]

Am i doing any mistake?

Yes

Is it the one in apples game center if i m not wrong?

No

[maestro]

Besides if you think you know the difference, it means you can predict the outcomes

i thought you said you know difference with enough data in some of your earlier posts...and being on the top of your MPR means nothing

is like me telling you...get 10000 bankroll get one of your best computers and go to casino and make your 10000 into say 90000...can you do that ...no

[maestro]

only way there would be rng in the mix is if any of my players used rng spins for testing

so having some unknown parts in your experiment does not make it valid...and also you mix spins from different so called players and if they are your players why would they use your computers on RNG testings

[Madi]

Where i can get it. Any link or instruction?

[Steve]

i thought you said you know difference with enough data in some of your earlier posts

Yes, I can. But can you?

and being on the top of your MPR means nothing

Short term data is comparatively meaningless. That's why people that reach the top of the leaderboard win rates above 1 eventually slide back down closer to 0.97 when they play more.

is like me telling you...get 10000 bankroll get one of your best computers and go to casino and make your 10000 into say 90000...can you do that ...no

Well to start, your initial comments were inaccurate.

Sure, you could turn $10,000 into $90,000 even with random bets. But doing it often enough to profit long term is something different. Yes the computers can easily do that in theory. The only obstacle is casino surveillance. You cant just win $80,000 without raising eyebrows. You are forced to keep winnings much more modest. The only limit is what you can win, without being detected.

[Steve]

so having some unknown parts in your experiment does not make it valid...and also you mix spins from different so called players and if they are your players why would they use your computers on RNG testings

What's your problem with me Maestro? If you are just going to throw mud, it's not going to benefit you. Really I have nothing to hide.

There are unknown parts in almost every experiment. You don't need 100% accuracy with everything. In the case of roulette, you only need enough accuracy to overcome a relatively small house edge.

Players of mine sometimes use RNG spins just to better understand how to use the software. It makes more sense to use real spins from casinos, but players import RNG from curiosity too.

Any other questions?

[maestro]

computers can easily do that in theory

theory sometimes does not overlap reality..and you know that..
and as my old friend says...<any way lets enjoy>
thanks for your time explaining

[maestro]

If you are just going to throw mud

nooooo Steve i have no problem with you or want to mud someone..

i do apologize if i left any scent of hurt...all good

[Steve]

No problem, all good

[Taotie]

So Steve, you made it an unworldly 15 seconds because Madi (whoever the f*ck he is) said it was too slow, yet he is clearly on some kind of glitch time.

If you want all players to show their wares and feel comfortable doing it, then more time between spins is the way to go.

IMO you should at least put it back on 30 secs, even better 45 secs as many players use legitimate inside spreads that require more 'mouse' dexterity than outside spreads.

If Madi doesn't like it then he can just log back in when no one else is playing and hit the friggin' ready button. And if there are others playing when he logs in then he can ask them politely through chat to hit the friggin' ready button. And if they don't want to, or if they are a bot, then he can just log back in when no one else is playing and hit the friggin' ready button....otherwise please explain exactly  for what is the ready button?

Leastways that's what I do, and many others who want a quick game.

IMO you are pushing many players out of the game by shortening the No More Bets timescale. I for one can no longer seriously compete with such a severe countermeasure as 15 seconds between spins.

I was loading up for a position one attempt, but now I'm stuffed, thanks Madi!

[Taotie]

I for one can no longer seriously compete with such a severe countermeasure as 15 seconds between spins.

I reckon it would take out all your computer partners too, I don't care how good they are. 

[Taotie]

Look, did you give us a game to play here, or is it just a proving ground?

Either way, 15 seconds is unrealistically short.


..and while we're at it, why isn't there a double up button to speed things up for heaps of players who could then at times hit the ready button even sooner?

[DoctorSudoku]

Taotie,
I agree -- I don't play the mpr game, but 15 seconds is intolerably short, especially if you have to place many bets all over the layout.

I have the exact same problem with the airball machines in various establishments.

[nottophammer]

Taotie

He cut the time to make betting large spreads of numbers impossible, at 45 seconds piece of cake to lay, then he cut the time to 30 and now an unrealistic 15 seconds, even B+M give 40seconds on live table, but even they are nipping it back.

Look at Aspers, touchscreen but not the live tables there own mickey mouse wheel sitting high up on a podium, and a monitor to see wheel going round, seems bit like smartlive roulette and where are they today.