Fishing For Doubles

[RouletteGhost]

Yes the way I remember was he bet after 4L and most L in a row he's ever seen is 7.

I think RNG went 9 but never more than 7 with real spins

I played airball a few times and it went very well but patience isn't my best friend.

I've never seen 4L in real play. So due to lack of patients I'd go for W after one virtual L

[RouletteGhost]

Patience*

[RouletteGhost]

7L diagonally is. Very rare

And keep in mind L is a good thing. What's the trigger

[RouletteGhost]

Vertically**

[denzie]

7L diagonally is. Very rare

I remember Lanky's matrix. Well it loses of course. Tested that a lot . It's the gamblers fallacy at his best 

Think I've seen 12 or 13 L ....

[RouletteGhost]

If it loses so bad then why didn't you bet for the L?

That would be betting only one dozen

[denzie]

If it loses so bad then why didn't you bet for the L?

That would be betting only one dozen

Why bet if I'm sure it loses ?
Common. RG you ain't moving forward at all.
Your in the game long enough to know this.

[RouletteGhost]

I think if it's played properly and it's fully understood it is decent

Personally I never had major struggles with it and I tested it for months. But that's just me

I think 12L may be a little bit extreme. That's 12 uniques in a row vertically

Could it happen sure

[mogul397]

So how did 4 winning examples in the beginning of this thread turn
to trash?

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul,

For dozens it`s a 1 in 3 chance every spin so it does not matter if there has been 100 losses previously there is still the chance of another one.  What we are talking here is likelihood.  Most that I have seen is 5 L vertically but I had already bet on the 2 (and lost) so would not be betting after that anyway.

12 or 13 L must have odds in the hundreds of thousands so an extremely rare event.  If you bet after 2L it does not matter how many come out after that because you are no longer betting that column.

RNG, double zero etc. all have an effect so depends what people are playing.

I still think that it is a reasonably good method.  Use Gr8, leveller, divisor etc. prog. and I feel that it should be ok.

Everyone should have a few decentish!! systems/methods and swop them around (even on the same table/session) especially if you can see an advantage/disadvantage trend forming.   

We all know that playing 1 way continuously will hit a RFH.  Why take the chance.  Lower the odds of it happening by playing shorter sessions of 1  way then change.

Brian

[mogul397]

Well I think you hit it.  I'm a little busy with my bathroom and some other
things, but lately when I think of the urge to stop by and pick up
my $20, I go into gridlock. I think "what method am I going to play,
how am I going to play it".

You define what has happened to me where as I'm watching results my
brain is picking up all kinds of patterns and I jump on one or the other
here and there.

Not the level of confusion I want then. But I think it is defining itself more
as the solution.  The toolkit.

[RouletteGhost]

Exactly bleep. 12l wouldn't matter if you bet after 2