Flat Earth theory questions

[Steve]

ETs appear to be interdimensional. From what I've researched and come to understand, the dimension we're in is dense and slow and we are not originally from here. I could go on but few would understand and I'd look like a quack. I'm a reasonable person but there are some things that appear to actually be true, however odd is might seem.

[Blue_Angel]

Another possibility is that what we consider supernatural, evil, good, miracles...etc to have an ET origin...
Have you ever thought about it?

[RouletteGhost]

Bottom line there is no way in this vast universe we are alone

Physics has proven over 12 dimensions and we only comprehend 3

[falkor2k15]

Bottom line there is no way in this vast universe we are alone

Physics has proven over 12 dimensions and we only comprehend 3

There's meant to be more humans living beyond the ice walls. The flat earth is the universe.

[falkor2k15]

Guys, do yourself a favour... just sit through it no matter how painful... and don't message your friends or leave your desk whilst you watch it... concentrate... simple..

[RouletteGhost]

its some guy who made a youtube video

anyone can do that

hes claiming nasa is a fake

they show video from airplanes and say do you think this can be a ball?

the problem falkor is these people are terribly uninformed on how planets and globes work

the guy in the video says "you dont feel movement"

thats enough for me to dismiss him as insane

you dont feel movement if you are moving with it......ever fly on an airplane?

its some whacko who dubbed dramatic music over a video with crackpot theories

torontos skyline is half obscured by the lake from buffalo

[Steve]

Ok I'll watch it again carefully. The last time.

[RouletteGhost]

21 minutes and 13 seconds into your video

ALARM ALARM BULLSHIT ALERT BULLSHIT ALERT

the rocket has an anti turn mechanism that fires, so it can stabilize

you flat earthers KNOW SO MUCH THAT ISN'T SO

[RouletteGhost]

[RouletteGhost]

There are a myriad of things flat earthers simply cannot explain. They make things up to fit their narrative

I will list a few
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Satellite radio.   (FM radio for the most part holds signal under overpasses, where sirius radio immediately loses signal)
               *flat earthers say it loses signal because it is weaker than FM, and they also say satellites are fake. I know because I asked their group, lol.

-Satellites
                 *flat earthers say they do not exist above earth because space is fake and does not exist. So they launch satellites to give us the illusion, then crash them in   . .                middle of the ocean, lol. I know thats what the flat earth society believes because I asked them

-Toronto skyline from Buffalo. Only half can be seen and is obscured by water, due to Earth's curve
              *flat earthers take photos from elevated surfaces to hide this fact to make it seem the whole skyline can be seen

-Hurricanes spin in 2 different directions depending on which hemisphere you are in (if you believe in hemispheres  )
             
-International space station. Clearly seen through telescope.
               *flat earthers say it is not in space, but NASA fools us by using airplanes pretending it is ISS. flat earthers use pathetic and blurred photos to fit this narrative
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISS is an amazing achievement, mankind should take it personally that you selfish flat earthers are attempting to derail the knowledge of others

It is a beautiful achievement.

flat earthism is a disease and anyone who believes in it deserves shaming

lets not forget, back when the illuminati and secret groups was at ITS PEAK, flat earth was the big thing in town. Galileo was put under house arrest for saying the earth was round.

Really flat earthers? satellite launches are there to give us the illusion they go up, then are crashed out of sight....is that what you really believe? SEEK HELP

GPS??!?!?!?!? MAPPING!?!?!?!

                           

[RouletteGhost]

i tried to block your posts

by using the ignore feature

sadly the ignore feature on this forum is very poor

so it is my civic human duty to fight this while i see it

the way you speak of Priyanka and how everything is a hidden meaning, you are nothing more than an overly paranoid conspiracy theorist

you can still change

quite frankly, it is the flat earth group you belong to that corrupts vaccine conspiracy research and geo engineering. ample evidence links mass doses of shots to injury and autism. there is real conspiracy there. But when people see flat earthers get involved, it loses relevance.

Stay to yourselves!

[vladir]

I have read some stuff about this in the past.

Most of them are completly nuts and really make litle to no sense at all.

There are some however, that scary me a bit, because they seem somewhat inteligent. Some have very detailed calculations trying to prove their claims, and how the earth is flat that I have seen and analyzed a bit. The logic used is actually solid. Only the premisses they take as base are WRONG to start with !(or at leat I'm 99,9999999% certain they are wrong). So what happens is that they built a mathematical crystal arround a void assumption. If one accepts that the earth is flat to start with, it's very hard to deconstruct the logic used. (I'm 99,99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% certain that it's not flat!)

[RouletteGhost]

Some have very detailed calculations trying to prove their claims, and how the earth is flat that I have seen and analyzed a bit. The logic used is actually solid. Only the premisses they take as base are WRONG to start with !

you hit it perfectly

they do the science right

but what its based on  is blatantly wrong

they start with something incorrect then base their science on that

[Steve]

1. Simple science suggests further away objects are unlikely to revolving around us. More likely that we are spinning. I dont think the sky is just a super magic projector.

2. Is there any proof that the super long bridge does not have a curve? He shows a picture from the sky. You cant see curve that way. Flat or round earth, the horizon will look flat.

3. This tiny boat is nowhere near the horizon.



Such a test requires a much bigger object, like say a skyscraper and we already saw evidence of curve with this in earlier posts.

The same kind of size boat is shown below, at same distance. But from a near sea-level view. So it looks closer to the horizon. It's called perspective. The boat is not much further away.



Proof nothing but ignorance.

4. I agree that NASA edits images. And I agree there's a lot they would hide from us. But there are many other more plausible possible reasons.

5. One of the people in the video criticizes the distance from the moon, saying nobody understands how it was determined. That's actually false. There's ample information to make a reasonably accurate calculation. And then the same guy goes on the talk about how there's proof we are the center of the universe. I mean really? So where's his proof of this? Or did he just recite that from someone else without understanding, like he accuses other people of doing?

6. Another guy says the circular motion of the night sky proves that the stars are moving and not Earth. I mean REALLY? So it's more likely that far away objects are moving many times the speed of light around earth? Could it just be that earth is spinning? What's more reasonable?

Tell you what. Stand in a room, put your arms out and spin around. Now the whole worlds is totally spinning around you. I mean you can see it. So it must be real. Seriously cant you see how stupid these arguments are? And these people are dead serious about it.

7. One way of knowing if the sun is a lot closer than most people think is go to sea level and take a photo of it with a set level of zoom and filter to see the edges. Then do the same from a high altitude. Is there a significant difference? That would be the test i suggest. But just saying the sun is much closer, without ANY substantiating evidence is proof of nothing. It's speculation. Should we just blindly believe something that someone says? Can you imagine how inaccurate your beliefs would be if you just believed what people said?




8. No, the sun actually does go over the horizon. It is not just a perspective thing. Want proof? Go take a long flight and do some calculations to see if the time adjustments between timezones are correct. The timezones are based on Earth's spin and the relative positon of the Sun. How on this round Earth can this simple logic not be understood?

9. This video is interesting:

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=iXNmj-JmrR8

But the most logical explanation is the rocket was unbalanced and causing spin. When the rocket burned out, the spin stopped very rapidly because of the rocket's fins and the airflow. It can be seen that the altitude drops as soon as the rocket burns out. This is probably because as the airflow rapidly decreases, the equipment that measures altitude considered the sudden change in air pressure to be a change in altitude. If the rocket had actually decelerated as suddenly as the altimeter suggested, it would have smashed to pieces.

10. The firmament is probably not something physical as we understand it. It is likely referring to Earth's energy grid.

11. Not understanding gravity doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Explain static electricity.

12. Why the big deal with this guy?



Looks like he was spinning a ball on a string. Whoopie.

13. I agree that reading and believing without investigation puts us at the mercy of people who want to mislead us. But that just proves some people are assholes, not that the Earth is flat.

14. The sun is not going over us. Look at enough videos of sunrise to sunset and you see its the same size all the way. But cloud and air temperatures can cause slight fluctuations.

15. The same side of the moon always facing us is interesting. I've often wondered about it but it's not proof of flat earth.

16. The arctic poles being off limits could be for many reasons. It again doesn't prove earth is flat.

17. You do not need to fly into space to make reasonable conclusions that the Earth is round. Although that would be the most conclusive proof.

18. I'm a pilot myself but you dont need to be to understand Earth atmosphere follows around Earth. It's a big planet. You dont need to constantly push the nose down. You are not in a space ship going mach 20. Thinking you would need to constantly dip the nose is juvenile.



A gyroscope still has friction and will not rotate even if you fly around the world. Again thinking otherwise is juvenile and very ignorant.

19. Some aviation companies not having direct flights between some regions is not a conspiracy. Connecting flights are proof of nothing. How do you explain other companies that DO provide direct flights?

20. Discounting all other proof, the flat Earth map can explain some obscure situations. But looking at the bigger picture and other known facts, the flat Earth model is exposed as ridiculous and inaccurate.

21. And the apparent reason for all this deception is for PROFIT? The elite make all the money they need from the banking system. They literally make the money.


That wasted more of my life.

Again, I couldnt find one valid or convincing argument.

[RouletteGhost]

18. I'm a pilot myself but you dont need to be to understand Earth atmosphere follows around Earth. It's a big planet. You dont need to constantly push the nose down. You are not in a space ship going mach 20. Thinking you would need to constantly dip the nose is juvenile.

exactly

prime example of why i say their logic is elementary

the idea that on a globe planes have to constantly push down, lol

it is a huge planet

a very juvenile idea