Revisiting A.D.D.

RouletteGhost · Feb 28, 12:44 PM 2017

A sore the says "pull" confuses mogul

(Jk)

RouletteGhost · Feb 28, 12:55 PM 2017

*door

Not sore

Thanks for the 2 minute edit time steve

atlantis · Feb 28, 03:12 PM 2017

Quote from: mogul397 on Feb 28, 12:27 PM 2017
The thread I posted...

link:://forum.x/index.php?topic=1376.0

Is about single dozen. Perhaps betting for a repeat of the previous
2 dozen when you get 2 within 3 for 2 bets would help.

Hi mogul - Quite Interesting!

OK - Let's switcheroo it round then!

Here's my previous results again but this time just betting FOR the dominant doz instead of against...

This time I use very mild single doz progression (highest was 2u in my test or can use eg: GLAT progression)
Also I bet three times as opposed to just 2 in the "against" version.

231
223
122 L1;w2 +1
232 w2 +3
012
222
313
132 L1;w2 +4
313
121 L1;L1;L1 (now up to 2u) +1
121 w4 +5
313 L1; w2 +6
223
131 L1;L1;L1 +3
330
323
213 L2; L2; w4 +3
331
232 L2; w4 +5
123 L1; w2 +6
333
213
112
122 w2 +7
112 L1; L1; w2 +7
213 L1; w2 +8
330
321
122
231 w2 +10
232
231 w2 +12
223
212 w2 +14
201
321
223
333 L1; L1; L1 (up to 2) +11
132
132
210
222
233
333 w4 +15
113
311 L1; w2 +16
132 w2
211
233 L1; L1 ;L1 (up to 2) +13
123
333
212
213 w4 +17
332
133 L1; w2 +18
322 w2 +20
312 L1; L1; w2 +20

Seems that +10pts more than the A.D.D. way.

Good Luck (if you need it!!!)
Thanks,

A.

bleep24 · Feb 28, 04:09 PM 2017

It is not sleepers that kill this, it is repeaters.

Played a session today. Came out a touch in front. 6 steps forward - 6 steps back so still pretty good.

Will have another session tomorrow and see how it goes.

Brian

RouletteGhost · Feb 28, 04:14 PM 2017

So.... 1 3 9 27 81

??

bleep24 · Feb 28, 04:16 PM 2017

I should have said 7 steps forward, 6 steps back. Also posted about repeaters before seeing change of method. Obviously now repeaters are good.

Bleep

bleep24 · Feb 28, 04:17 PM 2017

No RG, we are not going down that road. We all know where it ends.

RouletteGhost · Feb 28, 04:46 PM 2017

On a serious note

On the original ADD

The general consensus is betting only the 1st two bets of the matrix with a 1-1 and is a loss a 2-2??

thelaw · Feb 28, 06:03 PM 2017

Lanky's Divisor would be a more conservative progression for this bet selection.

Perhaps looking for +1 unit per hour of play (50-60spins) + an emergency progressive bank (100-200-400-800) after a certain loss limit is reached would create a full-proof method for long-term play.

Not exciting.........but very profitable, as the betting range would stay pretty limited.......so well under the table limits at all times.

mogul397 · Feb 28, 08:56 PM 2017

It was just a thought question. Because in real time you can get the
impression that it is a rolling method.

After all, just because you just played one trigger, doesn't mean that you
couldn't fall into the next trigger. And what's to say that that would be
where you entered play?

mogul397 · Feb 28, 08:57 PM 2017

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 28, 12:55 PM 2017
*door

Not sore

Thanks for the 2 minute edit time steve

You were right the first time.

mogul397 · Feb 28, 09:03 PM 2017

Quote from: atlantis on Feb 28, 03:12 PM 2017

Hi mogul - Quite Interesting!
OK - Let's switcheroo it round then!

Here's my previous results again but this time just betting FOR the dominant doz instead of against...

This time I use very mild single doz progression (highest was 2u in my test or can use eg: GLAT progression)
Also I bet three times as opposed to just 2 in the "against" version.

231
223
122 L1;w2 +1
232 w2 +3
012
222
313
132 L1;w2 +4
313
121 L1;L1;L1 (now up to 2u) +1
121 w4 +5
313 L1; w2 +6
223
131 L1;L1;L1 +3
330
323
213 L2; L2; w4 +3
331
232 L2; w4 +5
123 L1; w2 +6
333
213
112
122 w2 +7
112 L1; L1; w2 +7
213 L1; w2 +8
330
321
122
231 w2 +10
232
231 w2 +12
223
212 w2 +14
201
321
223
333 L1; L1; L1 (up to 2) +11
132
132
210
222
233
333 w4 +15
113
311 L1; w2 +16
132 w2
211
233 L1; L1 ;L1 (up to 2) +13
123
333
212
213 w4 +17
332
133 L1; w2 +18
322 w2 +20
312 L1; L1; w2 +20

Seems that +10pts more than the A.D.D. way.

Good Luck (if you need it!!!)
Thanks,

A.

Not too shabby!!!!!!

While you were all having this gabfest I was away at the casino, trying to figure
out what method to play. I won $16. But not on these. Oddly enough I saw
a setup for the XYY, bet on the two dozen and lost a bet.

Hit AGAIN on my 25/27 thing on the table. They like each other. And I keep wondering
if it suggests anything else.

I'll keep plugging on this. Good idea and variation.

thelaw · Mar 01, 06:54 PM 2017

Just for reference from above chart:

LWWLWLLLWLWLLLLLWLWLWWLLWLWWWWLLLWLWWLLLWLWWLLW

21 wins and 27 losses, so statistically a good run.

RouletteGhost · Mar 01, 10:14 PM 2017

Allow me to join the party

75 spins
--------------------------------------------------------
25 mini games
--------------------------------------------------------
17 mini games playable with proper trigger
--------------------------------------------------------

Results two ways

*With progression 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, no losses
+17 units

*With progression 1-1, 2-2, on first 2 bets of matrix only, one mini game loss
+3 units

RouletteGhost · Mar 01, 10:26 PM 2017

I am not thrilled about being only +3 units after 75 spins

but obviously that was a tough session, lots of 1st try losses then the break even win on the 2nd try

so will entertain the original way of betting only the first two spins of the matrix but perhaps with a 1-1, 3-3

had I done 1-1, 3-3 on first two spins of each mini game, I would have suffered one mini game loss but still made +8 units, and that I can deal with

so for me at this time, testing going forward, I will cap each mini game at 1-1, 3-3 and if lose go back to 1-1 on next mini game

grass roots deja vu hit me. oye.

News:

Revisiting A.D.D.