• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The Ultimate Holy Atm Grail

Started by denzie, Mar 10, 06:11 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

What if you found the real deal ? The real holy grail. The ticket to a easy life...

I would share it on all forums coz I'm a good person
4 (20%)
I would shut up and milk the casino's till I die
8 (40%)
I would share it with a few members here although I really don't know them
3 (15%)
you getting where I'm at and you wouldn't be here if you really got the HG
5 (25%)

Total Members Voted: 20

Voting closed: Jun 18, 07:11 PM 2017

Steve

If you test properly, you'll find the bird doesn't give a crap what you think. It does what it does regardless.

What you posted is cryptic and vague. Its basically baiting which is against the rules. If you are going to share a principle, please be clear. Don't play games and make people guess.

Of what u could understand, it was incorrect. But in this case its mostly guessing wtf you are on about. With weird images.

Be clear and give a specific example to prove your theories. Im starting to see what people have against you.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

QuoteIf you test properly, you'll find the bird doesn't give a crap what you think. It does what it does regardless.
But it's limited to 4 spins?

RRRRR.... no limit, right? We could get 6 reds in a row, 12 or 22? Where the cage/limit for reds in a row? There isn't one...

13215... bet the 2nd to last line on a rolling basis... where's the limit for FTL? There isn't one...

That's why nobody can beat the game because they bet randomly within a limitless framework. Nothing vague about that whatsoever.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

Steve

There are no limits.

Limitless framework?

You appear to be contradicting yourself.  Yes you are still being vague.

Im not sure anyone has a clue what you're saying
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

RouletteGhost

I've been nice to him in the past as others have asking him to explain what he is saying

Instead of doing that, he writes an entire novel as an answer that no one understands

I think it's on purpose

Oh well

Steve are you going to make a real ignore feature
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

Quote from: Steve on Mar 13, 07:23 AM 2017
There are no limits.

Limitless framework?

You appear to be contradicting yourself.  Yes you are still being vague.

Im not sure anyone has a clue what you're saying
But I thought we all agreed on a limit of 4 spins excluding zero!?  :question: So once again it seems we cannot agree on basic tests/observations. That doesn't mean I'm being vague; that's simply your excuse for not agreeing with the facts, like ships not disappearing over the horizon.

Let's see what others think about limits vs. no limits?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

Steve

Falkor show me where i ever agreed on a limit of 4 spins.

Rg there is already an ignore member feature. But it's not good in principle because you still see responses to their messages.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

Quote from: Steve on Mar 13, 07:38 AM 2017
Falkor show me where i ever agreed on a limit of 4 spins.

Rg there is already an ignore member feature. But it's not good in principle because you still see responses to their messages.
I know you haven't agree yet - but at least RG and Dr. both agreed on the limit - once the exclusion of zero was clarified; my bad for overlooking that.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

Knowing that within 4 spins a dozen will repeat or within 3 spins a color will repeat does not in anyway at all help us win
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

thelaw

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Mar 13, 07:48 AM 2017
I know you haven't agree yet - but at least RG and Dr. both agreed on the limit - once the exclusion of zero was clarified; my bad for overlooking that.

Falkor now telling Steve what he will believe in the future...... :sad2:



Only one way to fight this Steve..........Remote Viewing!!! :lol:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

falkor2k15

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Mar 13, 10:27 AM 2017
Knowing that within 4 spins a dozen will repeat or within 3 spins a color will repeat does not in anyway at all help us win
Do you have any idea how many hours Priyanka has spent in the Random Thoughts topic or how many hours I wasted on my slide-show making the case for the complete opposite to your assumption?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

Well not my fault you are wasting your time

House edge stays same

Enjoy the game
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

Well, at least some of us have benefited from all the hard work - myself included - but ignorant assumptions lead nowhere; your replies are counter-productive...
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

XXedos

Falkor,
I work well quad cycle, and dozen cycle, both put a lot of chips.
I thank a lot of work !
Regards
Zoltan

falkor2k15

Quote from: XXedos on Mar 13, 12:36 PM 2017
Falkor,
I work well quad cycle, and dozen cycle, both put a lot of chips.
I thank a lot of work !
Regards
Zoltan
Good to hear!

Remember, guys: tracking for multiple repeats of dozens = less dozens involved! Here's first dozen to 3 repeats alongside Dozen Cycles (taking place inside a cage):



Dozen 1 wins!!!  :thumbsup:
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

Manz don't know innit... You get me, like?

"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

-