Questions for Priyanka...

[RouletteGhost]

What a croc
People say the pieces are there sounds like another shyster xalled kimo ...li.....

The biggest phones, false flag, in the history of this forum is falkor. Writing is on the wall. He's been allowed to turn this forum into a mockery.

[maestro]

spot on 

[RouletteGhost]

The biggest phones, false flag, in the history of this forum is falkor. Writing is on the wall. He's been allowed to turn this forum into a mockery.

*phony not phones

[Steve]

He's been allowed to turn this forum into a mockery

Should we ban him and why? There are a lot of inaccurate statements from many members but that doesnt mean we ban them.

[RouletteGhost]

I personally think he is trolling

Maybe I'm paranoid

Either way he doesn't make sense

[Steve]

On any forum you will find people you dont agree with. People who are nice. People who are arrogant. People who are deluded. You will find all sorts of people in every area of life. Basically the only time I ban people is if they are a sufficiently negative influence on the forum (like spammers and trolls). If ANY gambling forum admin banned people who gave incorrect or bad advice, the forums would be very quiet. I am not anyone's father protecting young minds here. If there is misleading or incorrect information here or anywhere, it should remain and people should learn from it. Learn the truth. Learn to be smart enough to know what's BS.

Its not admins responsibility to ban people they consider are wrong. It is everyone's own responsibility to take whatever information they want and make up their own mind. Its the same as real life.

I dont mean to be abrupt, but I think Falkor's theories are extremely wrong and not well thought out. And Priyanka has allowed people to be misled about his win rate on the roulette game. I've already given my opinion in both cases (and facts), and everyone can make up their own mind too. They are both doing things wrong in my opinion, but it is not justified to ban them.

Also as for some complaints about the quality of discussions on the forum . . . actually the members make the forum. Its like complaining about yourself. And you dont need to follow or read every conversation, just like changing the TV channel you dont like. Anyone at any time can choose to contribute and share something of value.

[Kimo Li]

Bigmoney,

On what grounds do you make your accusation? I am calling you out. I don't care who you are. What I do care about is slander and defamation of  character.

Kimo Li

[RouletteGhost]

Bigmoney,

On what grounds do you make your accusation? I am calling you out. I don't care who you are. What I do care about is slander and defamation of  character.

Kimo Li

You use mechanical systems (no AP) for personal gain. On a game at which the math cannot be changed

That makes you a hack

Sorry

[DoctorSudoku]

I am not anyone's father protecting young minds here. If there is misleading or incorrect information here or anywhere, it should remain and people should learn from it. Learn the truth. Learn to be smart enough to know what's BS.

Its not admins responsibility to ban people they consider are wrong. It is everyone's own responsibility to take whatever information they want and make up their own mind. Its the same as real life.

Well stated.

The above statements (especially, the ones highlighted above) should be kept in mind not only about some of the stuff Gilius-Falkor has written about, but also in regards to all the negative progression crap that has been posted on this (and other roulette forums) over the years.

[Kimo Li]

You use mechanical systems (no AP) for personal gain. On a game at which the math cannot be changed

That makes you a hack

Sorry

You have no clue as to what I use to play roulette.
That makes you...ig......(uninformed).

Sorry

[Taotie]

Anyone at any time can choose to contribute and share something of value.

I like poopy snoot.

[falkor2k15]

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18348.msg171905#msg171905
link:s://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8V2R2PUfxa7U1NNV05mMldKNGc/view

[ignatus]

[RouletteGhost]

Exactly

And judging by the posts and charts like the one two poss above, it's a troll with a LOT of time on his hands

You don't actually think he believes this do you?

[Malvador]

Hi Priyanka,

Im new here and have been following your posts for a while now... Needless to say I'm very interested in your system and the way in which you approach the game of roulette.

Obviously I'm trying to figure out how you bet, where and when... (in your personal system) now I understand that you don't want to divulge anymore or give step by step instructions which I respect however I wonder if you might indulge me with a few questions. Hopefully that will help clarify things what you have already stated in the past.



1). In your humble opinion What non-randon theory/principle should we study the most?

2). Are you combining this principle with the LOT (Law of thirds) to reach the advantage you speak of?

3). Do you use a parachute type progression when your non random event fails to materialize?

4). What is your starting bet placement.. Ie.. Dozens or six line... Etc.

5). Do you think the pigeon hole principle is of little value, medium value, or great value to us as players?

I know that you may not be able to answer some of these questions but it's worth a shot as I genuinely believe that you have found a way of perception that many cannot.

Kindest regards

Malvador