Questions for Priyanka...

[Malvador]

Thank you for your opinion falkor, I didn't mean to offend you, I just wanted to keep the focus on the topic being discussed without anything abstract... The principles Priyanka are leading us to.. Need to be focused upon. That's all I was saying.

Again apologies if I offended you 

[nottophammer]

call home - resembling a spinning ball through space with other 3D bodies as well as not-so-3D bodies like black holes

like it you old dog

[stringbeanpc]

What does this mean? It means the player does not need any tracking device, manual or computer.
It means you can actually walk up to any table and start playing. Why? Because the events everyone seek is right before their eyes, but fail to see it.

This is where I am struggling, but I do NOT know the right questions to ask.

[Kimo Li]

No one in their right mind would give up their signature event. But, I will give you an example of basic events.
You see, events are created, non-random. Create you own event. Apply it when you see it.


RBRBRBRB
LHLHLHLH
OEOEOEOE

Spins
07
04
32
30
05
21
09
07

Events
R-O-L
B-E-H
R-O-L
B-E-H
R-O-L
B-E-H
R-O-L
B-E-H

Spins and RB Event
-07-R-R-W
-04-B-B-W
-32-R-R-W
-30-R-B-L
-05-R-R-W
-21-R-B-L
-09-R-R-W
-07-R-B-L

Spins and OE Event
-07-O-O-W
-04-E-E-W
-32-E-O-L
-30-E-E-W
-05-O-O-W
-21-O-E-L
-09-O-O-W
-07-O-E-L

Spins and LH Event
-07-L-L-W
-04-L-H-L
-32-H-L-L
-30-H-H-W
-05-L-L-W
-21-H-H-W
-09-L-L-W
-07-L-H-L

[falkor2k15]

Another question for Priyanka... do all events have to be repeats of some kind or do Kimo Li's examples of events also qualify, i.e. R-O-L.? In other words: events have to have limits right, otherwise we can't possibly have any predictability over them?

[stringbeanpc]

Kimo Li, thank you for you example of an "event". It has given me some new ideas.

This posting is delayed because I prefer to think and analyze something.

Also, I had no intention of asking for your signature event.

Best Regards,

[Scarface]

Is there any evidence that betting "events" give you an edge?  Is it because events have less variance making it easy to overcome with a progression?  I'm thinking the worse case scenerio over millions of spins is something like 25 reds in a row (or something like that).  Is it likely that a 50/50 "event" can be that bad?

[falkor2k15]

Is there any evidence that betting "events" give you an edge?  Is it because events have less variance making it easy to overcome with a progression?  I'm thinking the worse case scenerio over millions of spins is something like 25 reds in a row (or something like that).  Is it likely that a 50/50 "event" can be that bad?

I don't think events do have less variance; notwithstanding positions they have constant ratios, be it 50% or 66%, to match single spin counterparts, on ECs or double dozens, say. This means that associated variance, i.e deficit and clustering is comparable based on the maths expectation. The only significance to the events that Pri refers to is that they don't occur on single spins - but through multiple spins governed by limits. That's why I believe Kimo Li's description may not be compatible with Priyanka's.

[MoneyT101]

Is there any evidence that betting "events" give you an edge?  Is it because events have less variance making it easy to overcome with a progression?  I'm thinking the worse case scenerio over millions of spins is something like 25 reds in a row (or something like that).  Is it likely that a 50/50 "event" can be that bad?

No events have their own Math statistics.  So there's less variance

[Kimo Li]

Hi stringbeanpc,

You are welcome. I know you had no intention of asking for my signature event. I was referring to others like Priyanka. They will not disclose how they track events or what events they use. The EC example I used was just to show how events work.

Quote from Priyanka: « Reply #61 on: April 13, 2017, 07:14:41 AM »

“Different people have used different non random principles with varying degrees of success. The common non-random theory that people use without even knowing non-random is "repeaters". That could be a good starting point. Starting from knowing when a repeat happens, then moving on to where it happens and how it happens - there is so much undiscovered.  The key irrespective of the method you use is, not to play spins or numbers, but to play for an event.”

The above quote, Priyanka gives you the smoke. What all players seek is the fire. “Repeaters” is an example, to which most are familiar. Yes, it is an event. Subsequently, Priyanka wants you to know, when, where, and how events happen, but will not tell you.

I will provide a clue. See attached. Keep in mind, it's just a clue.

Kimo Li

[Scarface]

No events have their own Math statistics.  So there's less variance

Evidence?  Do you have any examples of this?

[MoneyT101]

Evidence?  Do you have any examples of this?

To find the answer to that your going to have to read through every math statistic Falkor put up in the last 2 years 

hahaha.... no but you need to choose your event.  Currently the most talked about in here are Priyankas' cycles.  She posted an excel sheet that gives you percentages for quads,dozens,and lines in the "Random Thoughts" thread  between page 22-35 i cant remember exactly.

Go punch in some numbers and see how the stats hold true for a set of spin

[Scarface]

To find the answer to that your going to have to read through every math statistic Falkor put up in the last 2 years 

Nooooooo! Lol

[Scarface]

hahaha.... no but you need to choose your event.  Currently the most talked about in here are Priyankas' cycles.  She posted an excel sheet that gives you percentages for quads,dozens,and lines in the "Random Thoughts" thread  between page 22-35 i cant remember exactly.

Go punch in some numbers and see how the stats hold true for a set of spin

I read through that thread awhile back, and pri's cycle percentages are in line with expectation...no edge.  It's like saying red will occur 50% of the time.  I have yet to see Pri or Kimo provide any evidence of an edge in roulette.  Maybe these guys want a cult like following to be seen as roulette experts.

Personally, if I found and edge I would share it with this forum.  Whas the point of all these cryptic clues.  Someone could announce a winning method on here, and most people would still not be displined enough to play it.  The casinos will not shut down just because a small percentage of people have an edge.  Blackjack is still in business despite card counting. 

I don't know, guess I'm just tired of reading through these long threads that don't actually say anything. 

[maestro]

I will provide a clue. See attached. Keep in mind, it's just a clue

...