Questions for Priyanka...

[falkor2k15]

In my eyes Priyanka is a bigger celebrity than any lifetime actors in the media! And since Pri is no longer answering PMs and would like us to discuss things in the open I thought it might be a good idea to start a new topic with any questions aimed towards him and his strategies? I appreciate Pri is very selective with his answers - and am not asking for HG - but would be grateful for any help with the following questions that have come up through private discussion of past topics about Non-Random...

1) In the "Journey videos" are the dynamic bets made only in "deadlock" situations specifically when Non-Random fails to work out of the box, so to speak, or are other kinds of situations taken advantage of - besides deadlocks - based on suitable use of stats of course? For example (with dozen cycles; although this doesn't apply to the Journey):
CL1 - ignore potential dynamic bet because no deadlock situation yet encountered
CL2 - ignore potential dynamic bet because no deadlock situation yet encountered
CL3 - deadlock/deadheat/deadrun - now look to a dynamic bet because Non-Random has failed
I appreciate this is oversimplified. I only suspected that Priyanka might be acting on deadlocks only as a way to keep the game simplified and without having to make paper notes for tracking?

2) With VdW and Quad Cycles Priyanka bets dominant/follow the last - but what does that have to do with VdW? How is betting dominant a simplified VdW when the theorem is based on all different kinds of APs over the course of 9 spins? Could it be that dominant betting is only made with consecutive APs - missing out any Non-Consecutive APs? But if I'm not mistaken then 2,2,3... means that 2 is still dominant, so a 1,2,3 AP is no longer possible? So to summarise: how do we go from VdW (at least 1 AP in 9 spins/events) to a simplified VdW used as a "dominant detector" yet still able to mechanically test the theorem to be correct?

[Priyanka]

Falkor am sorry, but not answering any questions on the videos. They were done to show examples of VDW, cycles and other concepts discussed. Nothing more nothing less. 

[falkor2k15]

Falkor am sorry, but not answering any questions on the videos. They were done to show examples of VDW, cycles and other concepts discussed. Nothing more nothing less. 

Thanks for responding all the same. I understand you are not happy to answer questions about the videos, but these questions are not about the videos per se; it's more about trying to understand the deadlock situation and whether that should act as the sole entry point in a Non-Random strategy; also about how VdW can still apply as a dominant detector? It sure doesn't feel like VdW anymore when we do that... any reason why you can't answer that? Again, without asking for the HG, I am really struggling here... and English is my first language!  Please reconsider!

[RouletteGhost]

Falkor am sorry, but not answering any questions on the videos. They were done to show examples of VDW, cycles and other concepts discussed. Nothing more nothing less. 

You mean there's no grand conspiracy that requires YouTube videos made in a basement?

[Priyanka]

it's more about trying to understand the deadlock situation and whether that should act as the sole entry point in a Non-Random strategy; also about how VdW can still apply as a dominant detector? It sure doesn't feel like VdW anymore when we do that... any reason why you can't answer that?

Falkor the reason i don't answer is because I don't have an answer. I don't know how to treat the deadlock. A deadlock is a deadlock and you are stuck there.

And what do you mean by dominant detector and VDW. I don't follow.

You mean there's no grand conspiracy that requires YouTube videos made in a basement?

Lol. I don't think people are not going to leave him even if Falkor doesn't want to talk about flat earth.

[falkor2k15]

Falkor the reason i don't answer is because I don't have an answer. I don't know how to treat the deadlock. A deadlock is a deadlock and you are stuck there.

But in the past you have claimed the opposite: that it's actually possible to overcome the deadlock situation; I just wanted to know if that is in fact your main entry point too? Without a deadlock Non-Random would work out of the box and make endless profit with, say dozen cycles CL1 and CL2; it's only CL3 that causes Non-Random to fail when playing mechanically for the next available repeat, etc. So how should a Non-Random strategy best be played - by reacting to deadlocks or ignoring them (or reacting to both?) - for the purpose of avoiding pen and paper tracking?

And what do you mean by dominant detector and VDW. I don't follow.

VdW is applied on 2 variables like Red or Black. With Quads we can apply on CL2 and CL3 - ignoring CL1 and CL4. Therefore, CL2 and CL3 becomes our 2 colours instead of an EC. Instead of trying to form APs you bet dominant/follow the last and refer to it a simplified version/application of VdW? But how is that still VdW? Although we have 2 variables (CL2 and CL3), betting dominant/FTL is not the same thing as forming APs? So in what way does FTL still resemble VdW?

[Priyanka]

by reacting to deadlocks or ignoring them (or reacting to both?) - for the purpose of avoiding pen and paper tracking?

Falkor - non random is a good starting point to be able to play. But however it doesn't work straight out of the box due to the nature of the way the roulette game is constructed. It is yet to be seen how the deadlock can be handled. Theoretically, a parallel game which benefits from the deadlock situation could be the answer. But practically am yet to see such a parallel game.

Whatever is in the past is past. Unless I have shown proofs of what I or anyone claims, you should not believe in the claims. You could get robbed.

In FTL, you have two results, either a win or a loss - two variables. Because we have two variables, we could apply VDW.

[falkor2k15]

OK cheers for answering my questions - your efforts are much appreciated and are not in vain - trust! We pay way more attention to you than we ever did to our school teachers!! I do claim to have found a parallel game for CL3 - also works for CL1 - but cannot play without paper. CL2 rather than being a deadlock - is more like a dead end!  Anyway, regarding pen and paper, I think the problem goes something like this... we began mechanical. Once we find dependency we look for bias by deviating from the mechanical; and with bias we can gain edge - but I don't think we should stop there! I think once we have edge we need to go back to finding a new mechanical method that takes into account the stats that led to the bias/edge. What do you think? Of course it would be kinda boring and a more fun method, based around a master strategy, would require all kinds of tracking and deforestation.

BTW, Priyanka, what can we call you besides Pri? Can you tell us your first name? Or we can call you Mr. + last name? It depends if you work as a school teacher, right? 

Thanks. (bow)

[Priyanka]

My first name is Sana. What's in a name

[Drazen]

My first name is Sana. What's in a name

Light 

[falkor2k15]

My first name is Sana. What's in a name

Once you lose your mortality then we need a way of referencing your immortal soul alongside the likes of Abraham Lincoln, Osho and Bartel Leendert van der Waerden...

[falkor2k15]

I'll tell you what, Priyanka... PM me your real name and I'll name my next son after you, as I'm trying for another baby right now; how does that sound?

[DoctorSudoku]

Without a deadlock Non-Random would work out of the box and make endless profit with, say dozen cycles CL1 and CL2; it's only CL3 that causes Non-Random to fail when playing mechanically for the next available repeat, etc.

Gilius-Falkor,
The above is the crux of the problem with this PHP-VDW based dozen cycle method -- for CL1 and CL2, the method gives  precise prescription(s) as to what to bet on either for the CL1 step or the ensuing CL2 step.

With CL3, quite understandably, there is no clear-cut answer.

This is the fundamental problem with this method and, as of now, I am not sure that your subsequent complicated (and even more abstract) attempts to bypass this problem will lead to fruition.

[falkor2k15]

Dr., the problem is already resolved with a simple enough method - I am just trying to learn how to gain edge blind-folded without pen and paper at hand so I can get closer to having the same amount of fun as Pri/Sana - Tehran based? 

[DoctorSudoku]

Dr., the problem is already resolved with a simple enough method - I am just trying to learn how to gain edge blind-folded without pen and paper at hand so I can get closer to having the same amount of fun as Pri/Sana - Tehran based? 

Gilius-Falkor,
Problem is already resolved? I am not sure your mentor agrees with that claim (given some of her recent posts).

Tehran-based? I think your mentor is U.K.-based (of Indian origin).

And another thing: your mentor is a "she" -- I know some people, like Turner, think that GreatGrampa and Priyanka are the same individual.

I have read many of their threads (both here and at betselection.cc) and they have somewhat different writing styles. So I think it is very likely that GreatGrampa and Priyanka are different individuals (and of different genders !).