Questions for Priyanka...

[nottophammer]

I searched for ROTT and all that appears is your post above.

please post the link to this topic, and tell us what ROTT is an acronym for ?

ROTT Riddle Of The Trot, its in notepad page 2

[INTERCEPTOR]

Thanks notto for this clue 

[Kattila]

Notto,
Also if one plays the already hit splits( for example) , then
there is involved both....hit and unhit numbers

[nottophammer]

Out of interest on the VLS site many years ago i posted something like the devil #'s, i made them out of 666, think i had 6 or 9 #'s, the point here is they are random numbers not the remaining 6 or 9 non-hit.

It showed to me betting random #'s do not come in as quickly as remaining non-hit do. This was why i showed Pri random against remaining non-hit is not as good.

But this is my opinion, so i mght be right or totally going in the wrong direction placing my belief in non-hit.

When i re-read GUT after pouring scorn on it after my first time of hearing about it, it totally made sense, why i hear you all shouting.
What is the larger group when you start? non-hit, obviously nothing has happened, but after the 1st spin what is the larger group,( non-hit).
So at what point do non-hit become less favourable to bet? That is still to be found.
Theres plenty posted on finding the repeat, as said look to Luck of the Irish, fantastic info.
Out of curiosity, watch groups of 10 spins, i post sheets with groups of 10 spins, thats where the 75% topic comes from.

Good Luck, but better to use Knowledge gained from your experiances and read info, which you can either take on board or totally disregard

[nottophammer]

Notto,
Also if one plays the already hit splits( for example) , then
there is involved both....hit and unhit numbers

A good point, something to look at.

[nottophammer]

It gets boring, but yesterday we randomly looked at betting the remaining 16 non-hit.
So here is 430 games it's showing the 22nd non-hit has hit, so you would be laying 16 #'s as the 21st has already hit, ok.
What do you see? the max its taken to hit is 16 spins, its average to hit is 2.327, total spins for the 430 games 1001.

Now what chance have you of winning if you was to bet for its average to hit rounded up to 3 spins, an 80.46% chance.
What of 4 spins, 89.06%
Still chance thou.

The question is should you go straight in for 3 or 4 spins, or wait 3 or 4 spins, does knowing this help in a game of chance, also a small batch of games, but even stats for a 879 games is close to the same data.

[nottophammer]

seeing the above and knowing a certain percentage could get you the win, does this give confidence to use a progression.
Say you could go 7 spins, you would so far lost 9 times. would the wins pay for the 9 that have lost?

[Kattila]

What about this way....if you go for non hits:
Attack only 12 from that 16 non hits ( you look for 4 most sleeper numbers and don t bet them)
and bet that 12 for the next max. 4 ( or 5 ) spins , then W or L4 stop. You bet again after new
*trigger * others 16 non hits , again bet for 4 spins...so on....I would use possitive progresion/levels,
like  1,1,2,3 / 4,4,5,6 / 7,8,9,10 / 12,15,20,25 .......
Other option is bet the 12 non hit but bet split stile , so 24 numbers bet, this way you cover unhit
and hit numbers , but the attack is only for two spins (or 3 ?) and leveller progression 1,2,4,8,16,32 stay on top
until new high, of course bet only twice (or 3 )like i said then bet again only twice ( 3 )after new trigger ...so on...

About the already hit numbers ...are to many numbers to bet on...unless  you put them in groups
and attack only one group

[nottophammer]

What about this way....if you go for non hits:
Attack only 12 from that 16 non hits ( you look for 4 most sleeper numbers and don t bet them) As the day starts it begins with 60 spins, in that time hopefully 1st profit from spin 11 has won. This will answer the 16 non-hit, as we've just started the 16 remaining are sleeping equally as its first 60 spins, if the win is achieved by either decision of wait or attack straight away, it would be move to a new stream of numbers.
and bet that 12 for the next max. 4 ( or 5 ) spins , then W or L4 stop. You bet again after new
*trigger * others 16 non hits , again bet for 4 spins...so on....I would use possitive progresion/levels,
like  1,1,2,3 / 4,4,5,6 / 7,8,9,10 / 12,15,20,25 .......
Other option is bet the 12 non hit but bet split stile , so 24 numbers bet, this way you cover unhit
and hit numbers GLC mentioned this way, but i prefer to bet as singles , but the attack is only for two spins (or 3 ?) and leveller progression 1,2,4,8,16,32 stay on top
until new high, of course bet only twice (or 3 )like i said then bet again only twice ( 3 )after new trigger ...so on...

About the already hit numbers ...are to many numbers to bet on...unless  you put them in groups
and attack only one group Yes to many numbers, this is why i look to spin 20, if none have gone 3, then bet the 2's to become 3's, but here can get to many, but its like Denzie says drop some, so when the 3 is achieved, just bet those 3's to go 4, but increase the unit. As mentioned in the 75% topic

I will comeback to this reply and read again as i've just got todays Jackpot numbers of the video recording and can see from the spins its fast to start, so my trial of thought is on that,

[DoctorSudoku]

Other option is bet the 12 non hit but bet split stile , so 24 numbers bet, this way you cover unhit
and hit numbers , but the attack is only for two spins (or 3 ?) and leveller progression 1,2,4,8,16,32 stay on top
until new high, of course bet only twice (or 3 )like i said then bet again only twice ( 3 )after new trigger ...so on...

About the already hit numbers ...are to many numbers to bet on...unless  you put them in groups
and attack only one group

Kattila,
From my limited experiments with Nottop's methods, I can tell you that it is not productive to mix non-hit numbers with hit numbers. You will get forced into negative progression territory sooner.

That is why I do NOT think it is a good idea to bet on splits. Splits, obviously, will include both hits and non-hits, and these two groups of numbers dance to their own respective cycles.

If you are going to use Nottop's methods, just bet on non-hit numbers ONLY (as he suggests).

Just my .02 cents' worth of opinion.

[Kattila]

Hi DoctorSudoku,
It was just a  talk and an exchange of ideas with Notto. It is clear that me and he ...have
different views and stile regarding roulette.
  I admit ..i focus more on hit numbers  , on the repeat of groups of numbers/ patterns/ gaps/splits.....etc....and  of course possitive progressions. I respect his work and i supose he respect mine.
And betting on mixed bet  like hit and unhit ( examlple splits) have nothing to do in my case with negative progressions
  Cheers

[ozon]

Hi Kattila, I once started a topic about positive progression in another forum.
I just had a question to you how to play a strategy for 1 dozen.
I found in Yours old posts interesting progressions. But I do not know exactly how I play

Can use flat bet or use positive progression.
When bett 6 splits, bet for max. 8 spins, L1L2LL3L4 and L1L2L3L4 or W
Levels: 1,1,2,3 / 3,4,4,5 / 5,6,6,7 / 7,8,9, 10 ...... 10,12,14,16 / 16,18,20,24 / 26,28, 30, 30 ... ..
                 
Don t rise bets after L4, stay at same level or down one level, rise only after W if necesary
(See bad run around spin 200, never rise bets after L4, stay at first level)

As in any positive progression, the steps are increased after the win, but when we increase the levels?
Should we win 4 straight bets to raise the level?
It would be very helpful if you wrote a little and gave examples.

[Kattila]

Incrase level after one win (i sent you example )

[Kattila]

Quote :

**

That is why I do NOT think it is a good idea to bet on splits. Splits, obviously, will include both hits and non-hits, and these two groups of numbers dance to their own respective cycles.    ***

Wrong,
Not everything in roulette *dance in cycles*
Betting on splits it is a good idea if you have a good bet selection based on splits.
I never bet more than 9 splits ( but 7 or 8 splits it s my fav) and never with negative progr.

[DoctorSudoku]

Quote :

**

That is why I do NOT think it is a good idea to bet on splits. Splits, obviously, will include both hits and non-hits, and these two groups of numbers dance to their own respective cycles.    ***

Wrong,
Not everything in roulette *dance in cycles*
Betting on splits it is a good idea if you have a good bet selection based on splits.
I never bet more than 9 splits ( but 7 or 8 splits it s my fav) and never with negative progr.

Have to disagree with you on your statement about "Not everything in roulette *dance in cycles*.

In my opinion (based on my own playing experiences), cycles and trends are important whether you are talking about betting in craps, baccarat, or roulette.