The Non-Random Master Strategy

[falkor2k15]

Since I am Priyanka's best student I have decided to offer you guys the chance to become my student - but you must possess a certain passion and enthusiasm for Priyanka's methods and believe in them wholeheartedly. If you believe the Earth is a spinning ball and you prefer living in a fantasy world where mainstream views attempt to dictate every aspect of our lives then forget it. However, for the open-minded this is an excellent opportunity as I'm also launching a website for advancing studies in this area - but to gain access you will need to prove that you are as dedicated as me if not more dedicated! So let's begin by discussing what these concepts are exactly and how they might all work together in a single master strategy?

Birthday Paradox / Positions
Cycles
Deadlock
Dependency
Dozens
Edge
Entry and Exit points
Money Management
Non-Random
Parachute Progression
Parallel Streams
Pigeonhole Principle (PHP)
Stitching Bets

[RouletteGhost]

Stop bringing up earth as a spinning ball or being flat

We already know you are very gullible and believe poorly configured YouTube videos with dramatic music.

Stop bringing it up

It makes you look like a gullible fool and it discounts actual conspiracies

[falkor2k15]

Please... no globe earth propaganda here...

So who is interested in master system?? Please discuss what you know already about each concept and their relationship to each other...

[RouletteGhost]

Pointing out that in the original post in this thread you brought it up

Can we please move past it

No more earth shape talk

[Drazen]

If you believe the Earth is a spinning ball and you prefer living in a fantasy world where mainstream views attempt to dictate every aspect of our lives then forget it.

Thank you for the offer, but as I dont believe in flat Earth it seems I must forget it on the first place.    I believe I sit in the first row of those mainstream cinemas too...

Also, I am way too taciturn about roulette in general. Even more, I just clam up when Priyanka or any of these concepts are mentioned. One of the reasons is that my knowledge about all that isnt as nearly as deep as yours so I can share it around. I didnt had luck to speak with anyone who knows anything about this. You are really lucky guy, you know.

I'm also launching a website for advancing studies in this area

This is interesting. I didnt knew you are that advanced.  You must have the edge then!   

Anyway professor, I wish you best of luck with your school. Maybe next year I ll have all necessesary to take the class 

Cheers

[maestro]

 

this one crcked me...is like this person alabala teaching math....

[falkor2k15]

Guys, if this program is too difficult to endure then you are not obliged to stay - you may leave any time.

[falkor2k15]

[DoctorSudoku]

Gilius-Falkor,
The above is a recommended reference straight out of Wikipedia:

link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsey_theory

Quote:
"A classic reference for these and many other results in Ramsey theory is Graham, Rothschild and Spencer.[1]"

Graham, R.; Rothschild, B.; Spencer, J. H. (1990), Ramsey Theory (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0-4715-0046-1.

[falkor2k15]

Yep - and who are the Rothschilds...?

[RayManZ]

Hi Falkor,

What are your thoughts on these posts?

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138738#msg138738
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138838#msg138838
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138848#msg138848

[falkor2k15]

Hi Falkor,

What are your thoughts on these posts?

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138738#msg138738
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138838#msg138838
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg138848#msg138848

I wasn't able to solve that mystery unless it involves parachuting or playing for multiple APs? If it's just based on 1 AP and Red and Black then I don't see how betting opposite can help gain edge based on just WL combinations. Is it variance avoidance/virtual betting? I heard something about removing wins to remove more loses, i.e. apples and pears, but still unclear... the only dependent streams are the APs and the WL tally; is that sufficient for Priyanka to gain edge or does she bring in another stream like Odd/Even or multiple APs?

[RayManZ]

I heard something about removing wins to remove more loses, i.e. apples and pears

I think we need to solve this first before we go any further. How? I have no clue at all. It seemed you were on the right path in the beginning, but later on you made everything way to complicated with everything else.

First solve that. Pri herself said it would be enough to get an edge even on red and black.

[falkor2k15]

RayManZ, I continue to find this initial VdW example rather vague... As I said, there are different types of solutions we could focus on, but I do feel there's been a deliberate lack of context with discussions surrounding this VdW on EC cycles of 1 AP, which is what Priyanka wanted us to concentrate on...

My best educated and informed guess is that Pri is combining Non-Random with Variance Avoidance or Deficit Recovery. Usually we have:
Red = 50% maths expectation
Black = 50% maths expectation

If red is ahead of black, i.e. 60% vs. 40% then we would bet black to recover - but there's no guarantee it will recover, and there's no dependency here.

For the VdW example we have:
W = 50% maths expectation
L = LW, LLW, LLLW = 50% maths expectation

Above we have some dependency between the L and LW subsets, so to speak. So I believe Pri is playing catch up based on L working with LW subsets? Am I on the right track?

[RayManZ]

i don't know if you are on the right track...

The first option to win an AP is this one:

123

So if we have RR we bet R to complete the AP.

What if we skip this one? If it wins we start over. with from the beginning. If it lost. we could bet the new AP. On a deadlock you don't bet. I don't know if we could gain any advantage because i don't know proper math but you could do some tests with it and see if it gains anything if you only bet if one or maybe more AP's loose first and on a win don't bet but start over.

Do you understand what i'm trying to say?