Priyanka THANK YOU!!!!

[Malvador]

Any clues -  Money?

I have been studying and attempting to understand this for months... I think I'm close but something keeps alluding me?

I would be very grateful even for the smallest of hints..

Many thanks

[DoctorSudoku]

However, if I may correct you there, will 123 happen next is not a statistical imbalance. It is very much balanced in terms of the risk and the expectation.

I think you slightly misunderstood  what  Rich is saying. He is not talking about dozens (or columns 123)  just occurring in that order.

He is asking that if dozens (or columns) have already appeared in the 123 sequence, then how likely is it that in the subsequent three spins that that exact  sequence will repeat?

Of course, it does not have to be just 123, it can be any of the other unique sequences, like 132,231, 213, 312, and 321.

From his own empirical observations, he thinks that a repeat unique sequence seems to be less likely than what statistics would predict.

[Priyanka]

From his own empirical observations, he thinks that a repeat unique sequence seems to be less likely than what statistics would predict.

Thanks Doctor. I am glad my understanding of the equation is same. Whether it is empirical observation or theoritical, removing the sequences impacted by zero, the number of times the repeat has not happened should be approximately 26 times the number of times the sequence has repeated. That is the risk vs expectation balance i was talking about.

[DoctorSudoku]

By increasing the accuracy of predictions. By using statistical imbalances.

For the sake of serious discussion, please allow me to put you on the hot seat for a moment.

In previous posts, you have said that you like to play with lines (i.e. double streets).

In addition, you have made the above-listed comment.

So that we are all on the same page regarding this topic, can you please answer the following two questions:

1. Using , possibly, lines as examples, can you give us a concrete example of what you exactly mean by "statistical imbalances"?

2. Again, using lines as examples, can you give us a concrete example of  how you exploit these "statistical imbalances"?

Please don't ask us to find the answers to the above two questions by going through the various threads that you have started or participated in. Some of these threads are very long and it is very difficult to find the relevant material in the the countless number of posts that constitute these threads.

On top of that, your disciple, Gilius-Falkor, has muddied and muddled up the discussions in these threads with his usual indecipherable crap making it even more difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff.

So your direct answers to the above two questions would facilitate the discussion of this topic immensely.

[praline]

Please don't ask us to find the answers to the above two questions by going through the various threads that you have started or participated in. Some of these threads are very long and it is very difficult to find the relevant material in the the countless number of posts that constitute these threads.

Yeah, there are a lot of letters. So please give the holy grail to this people... Don't make them read all your posts, it's so boring... They have a lot of fun things to do, so, Priyanka:

1. Make a lot of money!

2. Send your money to this people!

And please

don't ask us to find the answers to the above two questions by

ourselves






I really hope she won't answer that questions! Even if i, also, don't know the answers...

[praline]

Even if i, also, don't know the answers...

Oh, actually, i know the answers becoues i read all Priyanka's posts, and all her topics. A lot of times, and every time i read it i understand something new. It's the most exciting part of "holly grail searching"!

[MoneyT101]

Oh, actually, i know the answers becoues i read all Priyanka's posts, and all her topics. A lot of times, and every time i read it i understand something new. It's the most exciting part of "holly grail searching"!

Yes reading the threads, then trying, then taking breaks and coming back helped see other things.

[Priyanka]

1. Using , possibly, lines as examples, can you give us a concrete example of what you exactly mean by "statistical imbalances"?

2. Again, using lines as examples, can you give us a concrete example of  how you exploit these "statistical imbalances"?

DoctorSudoku - very valid questions. I know the answer to first question. In fact i answered it the other day in a notto post. 76% of the time the first repeat of a spin, happens from numbers that appeared in the last 3 lines. Following is an example.

7
4
32
30
5
21
9
7

That is an imbalance. You are increasing the accuracy of prediction of a repeat from a random guess. Now the 2nd question, let us keep it that I dont know the answer to.

[nottophammer]

you are not claiming the 27 here from spins 6,7,8&9 - come on,you might as well claim the 29 for a win from last 3 double streets,spins 1,2&3 using that idea for a win.
But there is a 75% chance for a # to repeat , in spins 1-10. To know that percent you need to collect your data for where you play

[DoctorSudoku]

DoctorSudoku - very valid questions. I know the answer to first question. In fact i answered it the other day in a notto post.

76% of the time the first repeat of a spin, happens from numbers that appeared in the last 3 lines.

Following is an example.

7
4
32
30
5
21
9
7

That is an imbalance. You are increasing the accuracy of prediction of a repeat from a random guess. Now the 2nd question, let us keep it that I dont know the answer to.

Priyanka,
Thanks for your response. So, from your empirical observations of your data sets, you have seen that approximately three-fourths of the time, the first repeat in a given set of spins occurs for a number that has appeared in the last 3 lines.

So 7 is the number that has repeated in your data set above. The last 3 lines prior to the 2nd 7 are:
5 -- line no. 1
21 -- line no. 4
9 -- line no. 2

And, of course, the 7 hails from line no. 2.

That is a very interesting observation. I have to check the occurrence of this "imbalance" with my own set of real double zero wheel spins.

[DoctorSudoku]

An addendum to my previous post:

Who knows ...... maybe this is a pattern that happens more frequently with the euro single zero wheel than the American double zero wheel. The layouts of the two wheels are different. The American wheel might show other types of "imbalances" that the euro wheel does not. More research is needed!

[stringbeanpc]

And, of course, the 7 hails from line no. 2.

DoctorSudoku, I could be reading this wrong.

What I see from Priynka's example is that Line 1 becomes the defining Line (defining element) when the 5 appears,
and the Line cycle length is 3 (ie. 1,6,5,1).

Then Line 2 becomes the defining Line when the 7 wins again,
with a Line cycle length of 3 again (ie 1,4,2,2)


Furthermore, rightly or wrongly, here is where I see the imbalance (see attached spreadsheet)

7 Red

5 Low

5 Odd

5 in Dozen 1

5 in Quad 1

3 in Line 1
and
3 in Line 2

RB vdw would win on  5 which is 345
LH Vdw would win on  7 which is 258
OE vdw would win on 30 which is 234 and again on 9 which is 123

what does everyone else see ?

and how to best take advantage of this ? (if you see a way, please explain)

[stringbeanpc]

76% of the time the first repeat of a spin, happens from numbers that appeared in the last 3 lines
That is an imbalance.

Interesting point !

Sorry, I may have been unclear in my previous post

[RouletteGhost]

So is it advantageous to wait until 3 unique double streets hit in a row, then bet those 3 double streets

[nottophammer]

vdw these 31 spins on multi player, plop and rngking there.


Well 10/10 wheres the repeat?



so make spins 11-20 spins 1-10, theres the 75%


so these could be live spins from steves customers.
I had 1 bet here, why 1 bet, with 10/10 better to wait for some to repeat, as we wait just more non-hit, ? is it just possible that group spins in 10 are hitting without repeating, meaning hotties as some call them are not going to show.
so as you see only 2 have repeated in 20 spins, so wait, thats what knowledge/skill is saying to me, now its a balancing game, waiting for #'s to repeat, seeing as its 8+3(WTF) could bet for a repeat, but as said i'll wait, now at spin 30 we have some repeats and knowledge tells me after spin 20 a number that has hit twice can go 3, none have so now bet those that have repeated and spin 31 is #13 for the third time. Left the game here +700, NOT LUCK