If you have a winning strategy, this proposal is for you.

[ozon]

In the past, I bought several systems for larger and smaller amounts.
And believe me , none  work, I was amazed at what the seller promised me, the friendly return of money and such other. It never came to anything, as I proved that their systems did not work, and I was losing money, they attacked me. that I've made up.

Therefore, these proposals are directed to people who have an experience with their system, and rather earn money with it. I know that if someone earns what he needs me for, as a passive profit, as additional money. I have time to play, many hours a day.

Right away I'm writing, I'm not going to pay, nothing in advance. I try to believe every person who writes to me, but I am in this business for a long time to believe that if someone played 1000 bets and has positive results, it will stay in the long run.

[RouletteGhost]

I wouldn’t spend more then $30 on any strategy

And that’s only if I’m bored

[junscissorhands]

Don't get me wrong gizmotron, I admire you skills and knowledge. And there's only few that I look up to. We are all human and in a casino environment, it's often difficult to practice what you preach. I've been there and done that countless times.
No matter how many tests you've done or any mental preparation.

It's just that all out of a sudden you have a winning method. But if I were you, keep it for yourself. That alone will give you enough profit for the rest of your life. Selling it always raises questions and skeptisicm.

Best way is to give hints and tips get people to think of a winning method of their own.

[junscissorhands]

30 x 100 placed bets is the standard for an above 95 % winrate strategy.

Anything that fails below that should be dismissed.

[ozon]

Some people really earn good money on roulette.
And I'm never kidding with money, I'm in these forums for so many years only because of the money. I never come to it like fun.
I am always looking for some new good source of income.
And I am always able to pay such a person, who shares knowledge with me.

[RouletteGhost]

30 x 100 placed bets is the standard for an above 95 % winrate strategy.

Anything that fails below that should be dismissed.

What do you mean by this?

[gizmotron2]

Don't get me wrong gizmotron, I admire you skills and knowledge. And there's only few that I look up to. We are all human and in a casino environment, it's often difficult to practice what you preach. I've been there and done that countless times.
No matter how many tests you've done or any mental preparation.

It's just that all out of a sudden you have a winning method. But if I were you, keep it for yourself. That alone will give you enough profit for the rest of your life. Selling it always raises questions and skeptisicm.

Best way is to give hints and tips get people to think of a winning method of their own.

I've given out the hints. I was a person trying to make trips to the casino worth it by beating the casino in huge win streaks. But that was also my downfall. It is for those that have real playing experience to figure that out. I was in discussions with several good players about this nemesis on our backs. We all experienced winning sessions and losing sessions. We were not improving. I figured out why too. At least I figured it out for me. I needed to simplify all this. So I went back to what worked well from my past. The answer was sitting right in front of me. I'm in the process of funding my bankroll. I'm one third the way there already. I have the right to sell this to one, two, or three people in order to get funded. There is no confusion in me on why I'm doing it this way. I have a reason to go to the casino with a larger bankroll. It's what I need. To get that I'm willing to take a chance on a couple of people. If they spill the beans then I will be the inventor. If they keep it to themselves then they will be the story too. Nothing like this stays hidden forever. They always figure out what winners are doing.

[junscissorhands]

You will be surprised that there are plenty of people out there who have a winning consistency. The game won't be removed trust me. I have beaten the game since about 7 or 8 months ago with huge improvements and final tweaks. The game has only one weakness, but everybody uses a different approach to attack it, but the very core remains the same.

[Mako]

You will be surprised that there are plenty of people out there who have a winning consistency. The game won't be removed trust me. I have beaten the game since about 7 or 8 months ago with huge improvements and final tweaks. The game has only one weakness, but everybody uses a different approach to attack it, but the very core remains the same.

Agree, no "winning system" would ever change anything in roulette's rules, ever.  I've seen Denzie and other people beg people like Turbo to "STOP TALKING ABOUT UR SYSTEM PLZZZZZ IT WILL RUIN DA GAME" and I laugh every time.

No one is changing anything, no matter how widespread some "winning" roulette system spreads.

Think of blackjack as an example.  Now think of blackjack basic strategy.  Now recall how many times you've seen people next to you using proper basic strategy, despite how well-known/common/old/acknowledged it is as just a default basis of how to play.

Hell, never. 

Even at the quarter tables it doesn't appear, clowns are doing whatever they feel like at the moment, particularly if they got the anchor seat and are hitting on their 16 against a dealer's 5 up card, half drunk and on god knows whatever else.

So the whole "OH NOES, WE WILL RUINS IT FORZ ALLZZZZZ" thought is misplaced. 

Spread away gizmo, spread away. 

[Mako]

I wouldn’t spend more then $30 on any strategy

And that’s only if I’m bored

I would. 

This will make you throw up a little in your mouth RG, but if I had the entry fee I'd pay Jun's price for admission, which was oh about 175x higher than $30.  Or David's for that matter, if he were offering.

With some players you absolutely know and have confirmation that they're playing and winning, and they're driving their primary income from it.

With others, particularly the dedicated "system sellers" you know that either:

1. They DO play their own system, but their system is fallacy-based, and they know it, so they're never going to deploy a life-changing bankroll on it due to the risk.

or,

2. They DON'T play their own system, and they've busted out, and are now looking for system sales to try and rebuild the bankroll.

Gizmo, congratulations on whatever you DO have, as I know you've been playing forever and you've put the work in.  Some of your statistical studies are fascinating to go through, so I definitely hope you hit the lotto with a grail, you absolutely deserve it.

[junscissorhands]

Anyone that owns a good consistent system/strategy usually has a good brain to go with in the first place.

Smart people find their ways into beating it and they will keep beating it and milking it in a way that it won't raise any major flags.

Mako, yes if Gizmotron2 really is who he say he is (the real gizmotron) then I wish him all the best as well. He was one the very few out of the box thinkers especially with randomness and cluster analysis together with mxiivv (sth like that), and now you see guys like Nickmsi fooling around with vdw, pigeonhole and FTL. It's refreshing albeit recycled stuff it sparks good stuff for the new generation of roulette players. But some of them need to simplify it, it's often way too overcomplicated.

[Mako]

Anyone that owns a good consistent system/strategy usually has a good brain to go with in the first place.

Smart people find their ways into beating it and they will keep beating it and milking it in a way that it won't raise any major flags.

Ha yes, I don't think any dipshits are breaking the bank at Monte Carlo anytime soon...

[ozon]

I do not understand one thing, if you already have something similar to HG.
Why sell it, for some amount, and not to make a profit in the long term, if you have a group of trusted people and you know it will work in long run, there is no need to separate, you need to create such a group, and I'm not talking about amateurs who are gamblers only those who are able to withstand pressure and gain over the years. Then, for some basic profit, you are able to change  nothing almost into a company.

[junscissorhands]

That's why never buy any systems from anyone. People sell them because they need money, simple as that.

Also one plain simple fact is you won't find a real winner on any roulette forums simply because of our human nature.

This has been repeated so many times.. I sound like a bloody tape recorder!

[ozon]

Buying a strategy is pointless.
I saw cosmic results on RX, I even played with these people live, but in the long run everything looked really bad.
It really counts only the long run and the money earned.
Only sharing profit.