• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I figured out the Holy Grail!

Started by falkor2k15, Apr 24, 05:41 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

Quote from: Scarface on Apr 25, 10:01 PM 2017Maybe Falknor does have a follower.

At one stage, even CEH (win3million) had followers. I think he still does. Every now and then there is a new "god of roulette" that people follow blindly. It goes on and on for many months or even years, and no winning system comes out of it.

All any new person needs to do is show some complex looking images with fancy sounding ideas, and some people will be hooked.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

QuoteFrom my last 2 tests and through inspiration from 2 topics (Basics, Random thoughts) I've utilized the left side of my brain to it's full potential in trying to understand how to beat this game of Roulette; using 100% of my brain power I present to to you my new system called The Millionaire's System - it could literally make you one overnight! I'm already several grands in profit just from 1 game!

I mean come on. Your claims go back years and follow the same patterns. If you used 100% of your brain, wouldnt you at least be able to understand simple logic to refute the bad logic from flat earthers?

But anyway, please tell us, what happened to your other HGs?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Here: link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16311.0

And you even did it again before this.

What the hell is wrong with you Falkor?

And what the hell is wrong with people who actually believe you?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

RouletteGhost

I've been saying this and showing these links

No one listens to me!
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

RG thanks I appreciate it. Unfortunately I dont have time to keep up with everything happening here. Like any moderator I rely on members to keep me informed of problems. I agree with your assessment of Falkor. But again banning is not the answer.

If you are ever down my way, let me know and we'll catch up
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Still

Quote from: Scarface on Apr 25, 10:01 PM 2017
I have a hunch that StI'll and Falknor are the same person.  Sound alot alike....could be wrong about this though.  Maybe Falknor does have a follower.

Well there's only three types of posters here:

1. Testers
2. Teasers
3. Tellers

Falkor has told me which concepts to test.  He wasn't going to tell which concepts to test at first, but then he did.   Once i sign up at his new forum, i am going to be the Erdo structure tester.  There will be other testers there, but i will be the main tester of the Erdo structures so that there will be an efficient division of labor.  Each of the testers will post their findings to the forum, and we will all share equally in the edge.   Falkor, our leader, already has the edge, but you can't blame him if he needs to see proof-of-work before he shares it openly.  Once the testers have proven they have worked as hard as he has worked on Priyanka's ideas, he will tell the tester where the edge is.   There are a few things that Falkor is still testing himself.  I'm not sure what those areas are, but i will be working on testing things he already knows has an edge.  I will not be testing anything that he is not sure about already. So it's a win win situation, kind of like Thomas Edison's laboratory.   Falkor will tell me what to test.  I will test it till i find an edge.  I will publish my edge.  Then Falkor will tell me what his edge was, besides the edge of the area he told me to test. . 

Steve

Quote from: Still on Apr 25, 11:17 PM 2017Falkor, our leader, already has the edge, but you can't blame him if he needs to see proof-of-work before he shares it openly

You arent paying attention. Years of the same bullshit claims.



Quote from: Still on Apr 25, 11:17 PM 2017kind of like Thomas Edison's laboratory.   Falkor will tell me what to test.  I will test it till i find an edge.



Still, you talk and think like Falkor. It's a good match. I actually wouldnt be surprised if you are the same person.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Falkor is the "luck dragon" from "The Neverending Story".

The NEVER .. ENDING .. STORY.

Get it??
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

Sorry guys, I didn't mean to overstate the HG as being something it's not, so I guess I have misled people to some extent - but unintentionally. Apologies for that. At the moment it just remains an approach: as RD said we are looking for a cheap investment - and need to capture more wins or spins... sorry, I guess by paraphrasing the amazing RD I could sound like I am baiting again, and we all know what happens to baiters:
link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=2BGonopGo3k

I guess I'll lay low for a while or just discuss these contentious issues at my forum.. no danger of getting banned there.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

Steve

Falkor, don't play the victim. You are worse than a regular troll. You have some real problems.

I really hope people do their own due diligence and see what RG and I are talking about. Luckily for you, the people you target are gullible, naive and not very bright.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

Quote from: Still on Apr 25, 07:41 PM 2017
Ok now that we have a list of concepts to consider, let's talk more about you're vision for your new forum. 

Once i clarify what you mean by structure, can I test these various structures and post my results in your new forum?

For example, let's say I want to test Erdos stuctures. Can I open up a thread in the Erdos section and share my findings?
Why not? That's exactly what I am trying to encourage... I don't want this info dying out with me.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

Still

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Apr 26, 05:07 AM 2017
Why not? That's exactly what I am trying to encourage... I don't want this info dying out with me.

You can still come back here from time to time to ask Priyanka some more questions...or to paraphrase RD (not sure who that is). 

On the other hand, how does having your own forum increase the chances of preserving a legacy? 

If you die, and the website is not maintained with annual fees, it could be eaten up by the web. But if you put all your paraphrases here in this forum and you die, the forum will keep going as Steve keeps going, or sells the site to someone else. 

Likewise, let's say i test the Erdo structures until i find an edge and publish the edge in your forum.  Let's say i want my legacy to last as long as possible.  Which forum has the best chance of lasting the longest?


falkor2k15

Quote from: Still on Apr 25, 08:12 PM 2017
Except for perhaps Erdos, Priyanka has expounded on these concepts at length for years, including cycles which is not mentioned.

So when you say it's coming direct from the horse's mouth, do you mean to say that Priyanka has revealed the HG for free already?

On the other hand, if you are bringing something new to the table, maybe you should get credit for it.

Is Erdos your idea? (I want to be sure to give the right credits).

On the other hand, if VdW was first mentioned by Priyanka, aren't you taking credit for something you haven't added any value to?
Cycles are part of PHP (also applicable to other Non-Random methods) - I thought this was clear already? Read carefully what it says on my forum:


Priyanka has revealed the concepts for the HG, albeit without any context. I've bridged that gap and given you the entire context to how it works for one of the two main approaches (structures and properties based on Non-Random). The other approach is Parallel Universes. Again, the new forum sets the agenda for that too:
"Parallel streams enable us to differentiate important global constants across all "universes" compared to those that only apply locally."

Erdos credit goes to reddwarf/rrbb who gave us positions. Positions is an advanced type of parallel stream that helps with the parallel universes approach. Both approaches can even be used together in a single system, so that's why a single topic at this forum could never do it justice. It's a whole new side to Roulette that requires an entirely new forum.

Priyanka has now revealed at this forum a third approach, for tackling the problem of Variance Avoidance. That was also considered to exist and had been alluded to through various posts by Priyanka and P.A., and the fact he had a connection to Manrique. However, it was only YESTERDAY that this was explicitly confirmed. Fortunately, a section for this was already in place at my forum, since it has been anticipated for quite some time.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

Quote from: Still on Apr 26, 05:39 AM 2017
You can still come back here from time to time to ask Priyanka some more questions...or to paraphrase RD (not sure who that is). 

On the other hand, how does having your own forum increase the chances of preserving a legacy? 

If you die, and the website is not maintained with annual fees, it could be eaten up by the web. But if you put all your paraphrases here in this forum and you die, the forum will keep going as Steve keeps going, or sells the site to someone else. 

Likewise, let's say i test the Erdo structures until i find an edge and publish the edge in your forum.  Let's say i want my legacy to last as long as possible.  Which forum has the best chance of lasting the longest?
Well, I got a 2nd child on the way, so boohoo to you and Steve!  :wink:

I already shared a video about Erdos on the new forum... there's only a 0.5% chance of finding a specific length structure for 9 unique numbers. I think it might be too easy to gain edge on Erdos, so I look forward to seeing your results.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

-