• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I figured out the Holy Grail!

Started by falkor2k15, Apr 24, 05:41 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

falkor2k15

Quote from: Still on Apr 26, 12:55 PM 2017
What tools and resources to beat the game are those?

It's a vague statement.

Are those tools and resources here in this thread?

Are they in this forum?

Or,

Are they in your other new forum?

Are the serious students going over there?

What does "dead horse" mean?

Does that mean it is your intention to never get more specific than general analogies such as "post" and "roof"?

You haven't answered several of my questions, including the question about you're implied right to have your feet licked. 

Should the gratitude of "serious students" extend to licking your feet?
You haven't answered my questions yet so I don't feel like we are having a 2-way conversation here. Unless we can fix this one-sided communication problem then I think we should call it quits. Most of your questions seem like questions for the sake of asking questions. I think you need to work with what you've got so far, do a bit of mental processing, and then come back with more relevant questions that could benefit you more - perhaps after some initial testing and having some kind of results to show for it. This approach requires effort to develop a working system tailored to your needs.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Apr 26, 02:09 PM 2017
You haven't answered my questions yet so I don't feel like we are having a 2-way conversation here. Unless we can fix this one-sided communication problem then I think we should call it quits. Most of your questions seem like questions for the sake of asking questions. I think you need to work with what you've got so far, do a bit of mental processing, and then come back with more relevant questions that could benefit you more - perhaps after some initial testing and having some kind of results to show for it. This approach requires effort to develop a working system tailored to your needs.

Do you have tiny voices in your head that tell you things
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 26, 02:12 PM 2017
Do you have tiny voices in your head that tell you things
I wish!!! Then I wouldn't need to play Roulette - and could claim all my expenses from the government - even get most of my rent paid without having to do any work.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

INTERCEPTOR

But what did you figured out?

falkor2k15

Quote from: MumboJumbo on Apr 26, 02:16 PM 2017
But what did you figured out?
That most people's brains here depend on having no foundation in just about anything?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Apr 26, 02:23 PM 2017
That most people's brains here depend on having no foundation in just about anything?

Then leave

As fast as humanly possible

So fast that your particles turn to energy via the E=MC2 equation. Or is that fake to!?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

But this is about da grail, man... are you crazy!?  O0
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Apr 26, 02:35 PM 2017
But this is about da grail, man... are you crazy!?  O0

Haven't seen you link any of this to roulette using examples

You've been doing this for years

Unfortunately for you, it is time to "put up or shut up"

Spill the beans or you are gonna have a bad time here

The time has come friend

No more bullshit
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

I beg to differ. I provided examples.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

It's the end of the line

What's the HG you claim to have?

Sho me on some roulette actual results
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 26, 02:48 PM 2017
It's the end of the line

What's the HG you claim to have?

Sho me on some roulette actual results
It's based on Friendship - but you are a Stranger!
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

The point is that the buck stops here

I'm going to see to it that this idiocy comes to a halt

And if you actually have a method to explain it properly and stop this madness

It's unhealthy for the forum

So decide what you want to do cause I'm not going to leave you alone
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Still

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Apr 26, 02:09 PM 2017
You haven't answered my questions yet so I don't feel like we are having a 2-way conversation here. Unless we can fix this one-sided communication problem then I think we should call it quits. Most of your questions seem like questions for the sake of asking questions. I think you need to work with what you've got so far, do a bit of mental processing, and then come back with more relevant questions that could benefit you more - perhaps after some initial testing and having some kind of results to show for it. This approach requires effort to develop a working system tailored to your needs.

I don't recall any questions you had for me personally.  I see a lot of pedantic rhetorical questions meant for public consumption.  Perhaps someone will answer one of them. 

My questions are for observing attitudes about the rule in this forum about baiting.  They are also for giving you an opportunity to express why what you are doing is not baiting.

I am happy to end the question period if that's what you want to do. 

I have not expected any answers to any of my questions, and see the random answers you've given as just that, random. 

So i feel it's been a one-way conversation.   

What else is baiting except a one-way conversation intended to get for the baiter, what the baiter wants?

I've asked you if you want your feet to be licked?

Didn't get an answer to that one, although it was heavily implied earlier in this thread. 

We can move on to the observation phase of my observations, as i don't think there is need for any more questions anyway. 

What you want, i observe, is to limit contributions to this forum to vague generalities and analogies, which are termed "teaching methods".   

What you want, are more answers from Priyanka. 

What you want, is to take Priyanka's contributions over to your new forum. 

At your new forum you want to exploit Priyanka's contributions. 

At your new forum, you want to exploit the group sourced testing powers of the group, to contribute to the edge you already say you have. 

That's what you're doing here, but there you can have more control over that process. 

The edge you have is not enough for you.

You want more of an edge, so you stay here to ask Priyanka more questions.   

You also stay here to promote group resources your way...for more of an edge, with nothing in return (no quid pro quo). 

Now, you are here to promote group resources to go in the direction of your new forum.

At the new forum, you want to promote and direct all research and development in the direction of what you call non-random concepts. 

You'll continue doing this as long as you can. 

I'm just observing the relationship you have with the rule in this forum about baiting before i make a recommendation to Steve. 




RouletteGhost

Quote from: Still on Apr 26, 03:23 PM 2017
I don't recall any questions you had for me personally.  I see a lot of pedantic rhetorical questions meant for public consumption.  Perhaps someone will answer one of them. 

My questions are for observing attitudes about the rule in this forum about baiting.  They are also for giving you an opportunity to express why what you are doing is not baiting.

I am happy to end the question period if that's what you want to do. 

I have not expected any answers to any of my questions, and see the random answers you've given as just that, random. 

So i feel it's been a one-way conversation.   

What else is baiting except a one-way conversation intended to get for the baiter, what the baiter wants?

I've asked you if you want your feet to be licked?

Didn't get an answer to that one, although it was heavily implied earlier in this thread. 

We can move on to the observation phase of my observations, as i don't think there is need for any more questions anyway. 

What you want, i observe, is to limit contributions to this forum to vague generalities and analogies, which are termed "teaching methods".   

What you want, are more answers from Priyanka. 

What you want, is to take Priyanka's contributions over to your new forum. 

At your new forum you want to exploit Priyanka's contributions. 

At your new forum, you want to exploit the group sourced testing powers of the group, to contribute to the edge you already say you have. 

That's what you're doing here, but there you can have more control over that process. 

The edge you have is not enough for you.

You want more of an edge, so you stay here to ask Priyanka more questions.   

You also stay here to promote group resources your way...for more of an edge, with nothing in return (no quid pro quo). 

Now, you are here to promote group resources to go in the direction of your new forum.

At the new forum, you want to promote and direct all research and development in the direction of what you call non-random concepts. 

You'll continue doing this as long as you can. 

I'm just observing the relationship you have with the rule in this forum about baiting before i make a recommendation to Steve.

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-