Funny Sequences

[Scarface]

Scarface,
I was also thinking the same thing that recording the sequences by using the last spin of the previous sequence as the first spin of the next sequence leads to HL and LH being equal.

Your analogy of Red always following Black is great!

Yes, it really is pretty simple to see.  Not sure  why PrI would run a total of 25,000 spins to test this 

[RouletteGhost]

Did you guys know that in three spins red or black must repeat

Did you also know that in 4 spins a dozen MUST repeat

Minus 0 of course

Using this information combined with unrelated scientific principles I've found the holy grail

[Scarface]

Did you guys know that in three spins red or black must repeat

Did you also know that in 4 spins a dozen MUST repeat

Minus 0 of course

Using this information combined with unrelated scientific principles I've found the holy grail

Nice discovery!  I got one for you:  Red will ALWAYS follow black if you disregard repeats.  I tested this for 1 million spins and it works everytime 

[RouletteGhost]

 

[poobear]

This I believe stems from the way we have constructed the High and low sequences by making each of the sequence that is coming out dependent on the way previous sequence has turned out.

Hi, new here. I think everyone is missing the point. All Priyanka has done is provide "an" example, not "the" example, of a way to make your own sequence of numbers.

Look at it as a thinking exercise.

[nottophammer]

Hi, new here. I think everyone is missing the point. All Priyanka has done is provide "an" example, not "the" example, of a way to make your own sequence of numbers.

Look at it as a thinking exercise.

So still chance,   

[Priyanka]

ice discovery!  I got one for you:  Red will ALWAYS follow black if you disregard repeats.  I tested this for 1 million spins and it works everytime 

Scarface - Indeed a good one. Sometimes, great ideas come from things that are very obvious.

I was asked a question "Why am I here" by Turner. Of course, it lets you think and I realised am here to learn. We all know that this is a negative expectation game. We all know that any method that is based on spins is a losing system, as the spins are independent and it is not going to impact their expectation (odds as some people put it). So we have two options from here. One - Move on! Many people have done and even I have done it in the past multiple times only to come back. Two - Rather than trying out the same thing day in and day out, try out new things. That new thing might fail, it might lead us no where. But hey! did doing the same thing over and over again lead us anywhere?

I started this thread as a way to see if there are any anamolies in the sequences. If there is a way you can construct things to see if there is an anamoly. Playability and practicability might not be there in the example that i gave. Am looking for some group sourcing as Still puts it and see where it takes us.

Please do ask yourself the question "Why are you here". If the answer makes you interest in this topic, please do contribute. If it doesnt, my humble request is if not encouraging people, at least do not discourage. Cheers!

[RouletteGhost]

There's an internal coup here who is sick and tired of clues and theories and bait

That's all

Show me via a real life example, how knowing a color will repeat within 3 spins helps you play roulette

[Steve]

ice discovery!  I got one for you:  Red will ALWAYS follow black if you disregard repeats.  I tested this for 1 million spins and it works everytime

I've tested billions of RNG spins for any particular sequence of red and black that occurs more often than expected, and the result was no such sequence exists. If you found otherwise, what is the exact sequence you mean?

We all know that this is a negative expectation game

But dont you claim to consistently beat roulette? Certainly some people are convinced you have the HG and just dont want to tell people. Partly this is influenced by your exploitation of the game cheating loophole. Priyanka, it's not personal. But you have a few followers and maybe you should come clean - do you or do you not claim to have the HG? (a system that wins perpetually - the kind that can make anyone millions) I dont think you have either said yes or no. I think you try to avoid answering. But this is like foreplay for your followers who hang on your words. If you dont have the HG, then the moral thing is to set them straight rather than remain silent and mislead people.

There's an internal coup here who is sick and tired of clues and theories and bait

You get trolls and baiters on almost every forum. Then there's people who just spew garbage everytime they post and cant even back their claims up with simple facts. One such person is Blue Angel. But there are others like of course Falkor. As in real life, it's the minority. But in real life you can just walk away. On a forum you want to learn at, you could ignore them but they still leave a trail of crap. So it's up to admin and moderators to enforce rules to keep a balanced forum.

Anyway with Falkor I've just moderate his posts. He can post whatever he wants, but if there's more of the vague baiting and gibberish, it wont be published. I don't think completely banning him is the best action. At least the moderation encourages him to be productive and stop pissing people off, or go elsewhere.

[Scarface]

I've tested billions of RNG spins for any particular sequence of red and black that occurs more often than expected, and the result was no such sequence exists. If you found otherwise, what is the exact sequence you mean?

Steve, I wasn't serious.  Just poking fun at this thread for stating something obvious.  I said red will always follow black if you ignore the repeats.....bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbr....see, just ignore all those repeats of black and red will come up next 100% of the time (just a joke  ) 

[Steve]

Don't screw with my head. Sometimes there's so much nonsense being posted on forums its hard to know who's serious.

[RouletteGhost]

I knew right away you were being sarcastic. I'm from New York it's part of our culture

[RouletteGhost]

Steve, I wasn't serious.  Just poking fun at this thread for stating something obvious.  I said red will always follow black if you ignore the repeats.....bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbr....see, just ignore all those repeats of black and red will come up next 100% of the time (just a joke  )

It's the whole cycle thing

I used to be a spectator until I realized it helps with nothing

Ok so..... dozens.... 121 cycle ends cause 1 repeated

So?

Knowing a dozen will repeat guaranteed in four spins? So?

How does this help

[bigmoney]

A dozen is not guarenteed to repeat in 4 spins

[RouletteGhost]

A dozen is not guarenteed to repeat in 4 spins

Correct

Pesky 0

The only point im making is that there are people who thinks this can be used to an advantage

How? Doesn't make sense