Funny Sequences

[Priyanka]

do you or do you not claim to have the HG? (a system that wins perpetually - the kind that can make anyone millions) I dont think you have either said yes or no. I think you try to avoid answering. But this is like foreplay for your followers who hang on your words. If you dont have the HG, then the moral thing is to set them straight rather than remain silent and mislead people.

I have said earlier as well. I added in my signature as well. I have never avoided. If you need an yes or no, NO. . I should book mark this reply, so that i can redirect everyone to it when someone says the same/assumes the same some other day

[RouletteGhost]

Wasn't my quote 

[Priyanka]

There's an internal coup here who is sick and tired of clues and theories and bait

That's all

Show me via a real life example, how knowing a color will repeat within 3 spins helps you play roulette

RG - There is no clues and baits. I have stated also number of times, I am not going to claim something i have not posted. And no, knowing a color will repeat within 3 spins, is not going to help you win roulette, like the millions of other systems that gets posted here time in and time out.

[RouletteGhost]

Priyanka

I do not mind your posts

I did not mind our random thoughts thread

What falkor turned it into made it an eventual joke

Get back to this thread I'll leave it

[Priyanka]

Good. Now that we have got that out, I think we should return to why i started the topic.

Again, Please do ask yourself the question "Why are you here". If the answer makes you interest in this topic, please do contribute. If it doesnt, my humble request is if not encouraging people, at least do not discourage. And anyone getting misled, please read the first post in the topic, we are not discussing HG here. There is a reason this is posted under the mathematics topic.

Can I take some help from mods to tidy up the topic. You can leave the reply number 46. Thats my reference for future.

[Steve]

ok thanks

[falkor2k15]

It's the whole cycle thing

I used to be a spectator until I realized it helps with nothing

Ok so..... dozens.... 121 cycle ends cause 1 repeated

So?

Knowing a dozen will repeat guaranteed in four spins? So?

How does this help

Start a new topic about cycles and I'll tell you answer. It doesn't give you advantage - but it nevertheless helps.

[falkor2k15]

Ok, that's interesting.

For kicks I took a 30k live wheel spins from a 0,00 table and removed the green from the equation just to look at these couplets.

I didn't allow any overlap so they were completely independent of each other.

For example..



and here are my results.



I was cracking up when I saw the final results, so I charted it over time to see the variance... Here...



I then looked at the max and min of the difference of HL to LH and I got a max of 82 & min of -52...

Hope this helps.

Any difference then between dependent and independent couplets? It seems HL and LH independently have less wild swings than HH and LL - does carrying over the last L or H make them even more tighter?

[3Nine]

Why am I here? 

I'm here to break the paradigm.

I'm here to do things different from those before me. 

[Scarface]

/

Please do ask yourself the question "Why are you here". If the answer makes you interest in this topic, please do contribute. If it doesnt, my humble request is if not encouraging people, at least do not discourage. Cheers!

I'm here to find new ways to look at Roulette.  Also, if there is a dead end or manipulation on a certain idea, someone should point it out just so everybody's not following this same dead end path.

Your post ended with a question asking what are our thoughts on your findings.  Here it is:  you begin each sequence with the result of the previous sequence.  So if you have HH and the next spin was low, the next sequence is HL.  Not sure why you do it this way.  But anyway, by recording the sequences the way you do, it is impossible for LH to ever repeat...it has to be followed by HL.  So, LH and HL will never have more than a difference of 1.  While this seems common sense to some, to others it does not. 

Seems like you would have realized this before you tested it for 25000 spins. 

If I could offer a suggestion- I think you should record the high/ low sequences as they fall, and NOT carry over the previous.  If you do this, the results will be more accurate and less confusing to others.  And I'm positive the difference of only 1 between LH and HL will disappear. 

[praline]

If I could offer a suggestion- I think you should record the high/ low sequences as they fall, and NOT carry over the previous.  If you do this, the results will be more accurate and less confusing to others.  And I'm positive the difference of only 1 between LH and HL will disappear.

I think that the point of this topic is> if you need different statistics, you need to create a dependency between outcomes.

[falkor2k15]

I think that the point of this topic is> if you need different statistics, you need to create a dependency between outcomes.

But bobby's stats were still different to norm even though his test was based on independent couplets?

[wiggy]

If you are going to record it like this, one thing you need to be careful about is the 'terrible two's' when it comes to VDW/AP.

EO
OE
EO
OE
EO

You are going to lose on 234 looking for O.
Lose on 456 looking for E.
Lose on 147 looking for E.
Lose on 678 looking for O.
Then spin 9 presents one of those mutual situations where 369 wins on O and 159 wins on E.

So that game is a 4 unit loss if you flat bet straight through playing a conventional AP approach.

cheers

[Malvador]

Has any one seen the chaos game? The triangles and fractal pattern it creates after multiple iterations is not random even though a random event is used to draw the pattern. Can that pattern be utilized?

[Malvador]

I think they are called seirpinksi triangles?
It got me thinking because you are creating a dependance by using the last random numbers as references to form the next point? Priyanka any thoughts?