VdW

[falkor2k15]

Headlines for today: "Non-Random, Non-Random... read all about it!!!"

[RouletteGhost]

How do we use vdw to decide bets

[sugtips]

It is a fact that we have just a 50:50 chance. that is no edge.

As long as you bet on the R/B or H/L or E/O you will just equal.

Do a trick on it:
Bet as you do on basic. But then note if you Lost or Won.
You will get a LW sequence.

Use the VdW-AP on this sequence and you have killed the wheel.

Sir Winkel,

I am a big fan of yours, most of the time am making money just because of your ext-fib progression and Sir Ignatus's Bet Selections.

Please Sir can you tell us more about your this above post. any link/url, any guide, anything. thanks a lot.

Love and Light.
SugTips

[nottophammer]

is it the evening standard or evening news, Standard,Standard, get your evening standard

Headlines for today: "Non-Random, Non-Random... read all about it!!!"

[Scarface]

It is a fact that we have just a 50:50 chance. that is no edge.

As long as you bet on the R/B or H/L or E/O you will just equal.

Do a trick on it:
Bet as you do on basic. But then note if you Lost or Won.
You will get a LW sequence.

Use the VdW-AP on this sequence and you have killed the wheel.

I don't think this will work.  Even using VDW, every bet remains 50/50.  An arithmetic progression will occur in 9 spins. BUT we dont know if it would be on a win or a loss.  We also dont know at what point it will occur.  If there were any way VDW would have a better than 50%, then you could simply make virtual bets and only make real bets when the edge exists. 

[Malvador]

Priyanka...

What do the LLLL (The losing 10 combinations look like?) of the VDW chart you posted back at the beginning of random threads, In terms of R and B???

[Scarface]

How do we use vdw to decide bets

I understand the concept of it, based on Pri's Random Thoughts post....just don't see where it gives a better than 50/50 odds. 

[falkor2k15]

Priyanka...

What do the LLLL (The losing 10 combinations look like?) of the VDW chart you posted back at the beginning of random threads, In terms of R and B???

AP 1 > AP 3 > AP 5 > AP 12 = LLLW
AP 1 > AP 3 > AP 5 > AP 12 > Clash = LLLL

OR

AP 2 > AP 4 > AP 10 > AP 6 = LLLW
AP 2 > AP 4 > AP 10 > AP 6 > Clash = LLLL

1 ( 2 ) Low		3 ( 4 ) High		5 ( 6 ) Low	12 ( 7 ) Low			LLLW
1 ( 2 ) High		3 ( 4 ) Low		5 ( 6 ) High	12 ( 7 ) High	CD7+14 ( 8 )	AP7 ( 9 ) Low	LLLL
1 ( 2 ) Low		3 ( 4 ) High		5 ( 6 ) Low	12 ( 7 ) Low			LLLW
1 ( 2 ) Low		3 ( 4 ) High		5 ( 6 ) Low	12 ( 7 ) Low			LLLW
	2 ( 3 ) High		4 ( 5 ) Low	10 ( 6 ) Low	6 ( 7 ) High	CD15+14 ( 8 )	AP14 ( 9 ) Low	LLLL
	2 ( 3 ) High		4 ( 5 ) Low	10 ( 6 ) Low	6 ( 7 ) High			LLLW
1 ( 2 ) High		3 ( 4 ) Low		5 ( 6 ) High	12 ( 7 ) High			LLLW
1 ( 2 ) High		3 ( 4 ) Low		5 ( 6 ) High	12 ( 7 ) High	CD7+14 ( 8 )	AP7 ( 9 ) Low	LLLL
1 ( 2 ) Low		3 ( 4 ) High		5 ( 6 ) Low	12 ( 7 ) Low	CD7+14 ( 8 )	AP14 ( 9 ) Low	LLLL
	2 ( 3 ) High		4 ( 5 ) Low	10 ( 6 ) Low	6 ( 7 ) High	CD15+14 ( 8 )	AP15 ( 9 ) High	LLLL

[RouletteGhost]

No one understands what that means falkor stop wasting your time posting things only you understand. It is foolish.

[Malvador]

what order have you listed them Falkor..... The LLLL seem to be distributed towards the bottom of the list?

[Nickmsi]

Hi Malvador,

Here is another example of LLLL.

BBRRBBRRR

On the 3rd spin you would bet to form a 1-2-3 AP and Lose
On the 7th spin you would bet to form a 5-6-7 AP and Lose
On the 8th spin you would bet to form a 2-5-8 AP and Lose
On the 9th spin you would bet to form a 1-5-9 AP and Lose

Hope this helps

Nick

[MoneyT101]

Priyanka...

What do the LLLL (The losing 10 combinations look like?) of the VDW chart you posted back at the beginning of random threads, In terms of R and B???

I've only seen this type

BRRBBRRBR
RBBRRBBRB
      L  LL L

I don't believe deadlocks are considered losses because when there is a dead lock you don't play.  Both these situations there's a deadlock on 159 and that's not considered a 5th L

[falkor2k15]

I've only seen this type

BRRBBRRBR
RBBRRBBRB
      L  LL L

I don't believe deadlocks are considered losses because when there is a dead lock you don't play.  Both these situations there's a deadlock on 159 and that's not considered a 5th L

No, the deadlock situation automatically follows the 4th loss - unless you win then there's no deadlock situation.

Remember: LLLL and LLLW are a unity. You cannot win by trying to avoid one or the other.

[sugtips]

I understand the concept of it, based on Pri's Random Thoughts post....just don't see where it gives a better than 50/50 odds.

Can you please tell us "the concept" in a simple way to understand. thanks a lot.

[RouletteGhost]

I understand vdw is based on arithmetic progressions

But how do we use that to help us win roulette