Convert a repeat into a unique?

[falkor2k15]

Since we can convert Roulette from a 36 number game into a 72 number game can we convert a repeat into a unique?

24 24... can we convert this into 2 uniques using the 72 number game?

[RouletteGhost]

Explain in detail , so that everyone understands, how exactly we can make it a 72 numbers game, how it would be played with rules, with triggers and betting

Thanks

We need to know what you mean by 72 number game and how you play it to make it so

No more propaganda

[nottophammer]

Since we can convert Roulette from a 36 number game into a 72 number game can we convert a repeat into a unique? Dont know about 36 to 72.But when a number repeats, its unique, but the question should be, how many repeat/unique, have to come before they repeat.This is Hottie territory

24 24... can we convert this into 2 uniques using the 72 number game?

[falkor2k15]

The idea came from reddwarf. We first bet 1 unit on Red
If Red wins then we parlay the winnings on a Straight Up Number:

1 unit on Red = win +1
2 units on number 24 = win +71

If we lose on the Red then we don't bet the number so we only lose 1 unit.

So that's how you play the 72 number game: 1 unit can become +71 over the course 2 bets or if you lose the first bet you don't play the follow up bet, so only ever risk 1 unit.

We could also do the same thing with lines > streets:
1 unit on Line 1 = win +5
6 units on Street 1 = win +71

We only ever risk 1 unit.

So my question is: since we are not happy that we got a repeat playing 36 numbers (24 > 24), we can convert that to a unique in the 72 number game and carry on playing, right? Or maybe it's not possible...

[3Nine]

No idea but here is a game of 73 numbers:
link:://:.roulette73.com/en

[Malvador]

Could it be number 48?

[3Nine]

Could it be number 48?

Sure, why not?

[wiggy]

Since we can convert Roulette from a 36 number game into a 72 number game can we convert a repeat into a unique?

24 24... can we convert this into 2 uniques using the 72 number game?

The only way I can think about is suppose the previous number before the first 24 was 34 (obviously it could be any number)

34
24
24

If you count the distance from 34 to 24 in pockets on 0 wheel.

34
24 (11) *That's 11 pockets.

Next up....

34
24 (11)
24 (0)  The 24 didn't move and so you would have the 0 pocket for non-movement.

In effect you are using two sets of 37 numbers. Not saying that's what Falkor has in mind! However it's one way of doing it.

cheers

[3Nine]

The idea came from reddwarf. We first bet 1 unit on Red

Can you point me to that post?  Thanks.

[Scarface]

The idea came from reddwarf. We first bet 1 unit on Red
If Red wins then we parlay the winnings on a Straight Up Number:

1 unit on Red = win +1
2 units on number 24 = win +71

If we lose on the Red then we don't bet the number so we only lose 1 unit.

So that's how you play the 72 number game: 1 unit can become +71 over the course 2 bets or if you lose the first bet you don't play the follow up bet, so only ever risk 1 unit.

We could also do the same thing with lines > streets:
1 unit on Line 1 = win +5
6 units on Street 1 = win +71

We only ever risk 1 unit.

So my question is: since we are not happy that we got a repeat playing 36 numbers (24 > 24), we can convert that to a unique in the 72 number game and carry on playing, right? Or maybe it's not possible...

Playing around with this, won 216 units on 110 bets.  I bet high/low first, then parlayed to a single number...the single I picked was the last repeat

[falkor2k15]

The only way I can think about is suppose the previous number before the first 24 was 34 (obviously it could be any number)

34
24
24

If you count the distance from 34 to 24 in pockets on 0 wheel.

34
24 (11) *That's 11 pockets.

Next up....

34
24 (11)
24 (0)  The 24 didn't move and so you would have the 0 pocket for non-movement.

In effect you are using two sets of 37 numbers. Not saying that's what Falkor has in mind! However it's one way of doing it.

cheers

So you are using a parallel stream not too dissimilar from clockwise/counter-clockwise? But could we bet on a 0 or 11 distance with 1 unit and get a +71 return? Probably not - but I guess you've still achieved the goal of converting 1 repeat into 2 uniques albeit using a 37 + 37 dual stream instead of a 37 + 72/3 dual stream?

[3Nine]

Can you point me to that post?  Thanks.

Didn't think so.