RVR OB1

[sugtips]

Hi sugtips

Moneymanagement is not my best side. :S... BUT they way i use to play IS

stoploss=wingoal*3 or wingoal*2

AND

Wingoal= stoploss/3 or stoploss/2

so, i suggest a +1/-1 progression

And to determine the BR/stoploss needed you have to see how great is the drawdown when you lost all steps with your trigger.

Great - Thanks - That's what I needed.

[gorki]

playtech live spin .....8 losses

35            
19            
14      13      L
21      E      L
8      O      L
5      B      L
9      23      L
32      L      L
35      12      L
16      H      L
32      R      W
28            
3

Sir RG I am not sure of that data, I request you to test by yourself. thanks.

[sugtips]

Gorki, I didn't mean that, I wanted to say, did this sequence at start of your session?

Pls tell us some more details, it will help us all.

Also please do more testing, at my side its working well, I have not encountered 8 losses in a row yet.

Thanks for your testing and support.

[bleep24]

Has/is anyone played this or tested?         Well I have in a limited way and the most losses I came across was 6 (winning on 7th)  I did not fancy using Marty so did 1 1 1 1 1     2 2 2 2 2  3 3 3 3 3 and it works very well.    Possibly +1/-1 could work.  - on a loss/+ on a win

We are roughly betting on 50/50 shots so should not get into too much trouble as  a losing chain is usually followed by a winning one.

I have been drawn to post this as there seems not to be anything worth while on the forum recently as regards new systems/ideas etc.

Bleep24

[DoctorSudoku]

Has/is anyone played this or tested?         Well I have in a limited way and the most losses I came across was 6 (winning on 7th)  I did not fancy using Marty so did 1 1 1 1 1     2 2 2 2 2  3 3 3 3 3 and it works very well.    Possibly +1/-1 could work.  - on a loss/+ on a win

We are roughly betting on 50/50 shots so should not get into too much trouble as  a losing chain is usually followed by a winning one.

I have been drawn to post this as there seems not to be anything worth while on the forum recently as regards new systems/ideas etc.

Bleep24

Brian,
Long time no see.

Are you still regularly playing NLE and NLE mk2?

[bleep24]

Hi Doc,
Yes I am still around and despite being semi-retired from work it is amazing how many commitments appear.  Long holidays abroad, visiting relatives you have not seen except for births, deaths and marriages etc.  Looking after 3 grand-children (a lot) and `helping` family with jobs around their houses.  I am busier now than I was when full-time working so who said retirement was when you could take things easier.

Anyway, yes I do still find a bit of time and do still play NLE (mainly mk 2) as I can watch TV at the same time (It is the only way that I have any time to watch TV.  How do people have time to watch netflix, box sets plus programmes that they have recorded (my box can record 6 different programmes at the same time)  there are only 24 hours in a day.

NLE is still holding up but I do look at others but they usually turn out to be dross.

So good luck to you,  regards,  Brian

[DoctorSudoku]

Brian,
A couple of months ago I was at an airball machine and I was testing various systems (sometimes with actual bets and at other times with virtual bets).

I gave NLE mk2 (i.e. 3 of one EC becomes a 4) a try.

I was specifically testing it with O and E.

And of the 20 O/E opportunities (total for E and O) that came up during that mini-session, 18 of them remained  at 3 -- that is, they did not become 4. I thought that was quite extreme -- but this is roulette, so nothing should surprise us (I guess).

I was virtual betting, so I did not lose any money.

[DoctorSudoku]

Continuing with my previous post:

For those who believe in trends and anti-trends, when similar situations like the above happen, we can try to capitalize on it by betting for the chop to occur (i.e. when you get a 3 of an EC, just bet the opposite EC).

That would of course make it the anti-NLE  mk2.

[bleep24]

Hi Doctor,
I am amazed at that sequence of 18.  I have certainly never seen that myself.  I do not believe in RNG or air-ball but as you were not betting it is very puzzling.  I only play Live.  Usually it runs to chains of 2 3 4 or 5.   Of course the whole point with NLE is to be playing all EC`s at same time so should you encounter a run of 18 O/E then you should be encountering 4`s of R/B and H/L to counter the O/E`s.

I have back checked 000`s of spins and never saw anything remotely like you described and hope that I never will.

Good luck,


Brian

[DoctorSudoku]

Yes, it was somewhat bizarre to see that many O/E getting chopped off at the 3 stage.

It would go EEE or OOO and then get chopped off at that stage.

I know you like to track all 6 even chances simultaneously, but I do not feel comfortable  tracking  all of them at the same time or even betting 3 of them at the same time (like you frequently do).

I usually focus on one pair at a time -- R/B or O/E or H/L.

Regarding airball, I know some people say it is rigged (like RNG roulette or other slot games), but I trust it (at least so far). I just think that what happened that night was again an instance of wheel-based roulette being what it is -- a random game of chance !

Strange events or sequences happen without anyone (casino owners) maliciously making them happen.

Anyway, I hope you do well with NLE and NLE mk2 -- and do keep us updated periodically as to how you are doing.

[bleep24]

Hi Doctor,

I now  mainly play Mk 2 (3 becoming 4) as it is easier to track but less opportunities.  Yes you do sometimes get all 3 EC`s to bet at same time and I do.  You can go 20 or more spins without an opportunity sometimes and then a rush.

Good luck,
Brian

I have been playing RVR 0B! and seem to have been very lucky with it but for how long and I have been flying by the seat of my pants regarding staking.

[sturrock]

Any body still playing this ?
So far so good.
Thanks

[sturrock]

That's a no then lol 

[bleep24]

Hi,  I am playing this  RVR OB1 and doing ok.  Longest was 7 losses (or it maybe was 6 and won on 7) so is a pretty good system.  Not doing full Marty as that ----------.     I play first opportunity (D1 and D3) continuously until lose then move onto next (O) then (E) then R etc. until won.  As soon as I have won start at D! and D3 again.   My progression depends on how far loss goes.

Brian

[sturrock]

Hi Brian,
Thanks for your reply. I'm not playing like you Maybe I'm playing  wrong ?? I'm playing 1/3 D first, win or loose I move along so next bet will be Odd then Even etc. i am playing with 11111 22222 44444 etc. progression till I am even or plus 1 or plus 1 on a loss - 1 on a win  Dont know which is best really? Never gone above 6 losses so far
Lets see what happens 
Cheers
Dave.