Maestro and ignatus

[ignatus]

You might check bias over 5000 spins by looking only at the winning numbers.(..) winning numbers can be predicted - at least with a slight increase in accuracy.

You're not betting for "hotnumbers", no you're betting for "winning numbers" OK, what's the difference, really??

[nottophammer]

MumboJumbo
i am with nobheadsinthehouse, as with all the other user names, yes he's right, but when you watch the trot to bet for either a repeat or non-hit, then the sheet works fine.
Problem is just the time allowed to bet and we know why he nipped 15 seconds, so to stop big spreads on singles.
If he's giving touchscreen options like at B+M then this one is missing the remove chip option.

The only way you in crease accuracy on non-hit is to know there avg to hit and the max you have seen them take to hit.
Anyway you'll just keep banging your heads on the wall with all this trying to perfect accuracy, whilst you lot do that, i'll just carry on watching the trot

[Steve]

Ignatus, i don't play bias. I was using it as an example. But there's still a big difference between typical hot number and proper bias analysis.

Notto, wtf is a trot exactly? Can you give an example?

[nottophammer]

its simple you just watch the starting 37 #'s. Take in what the sheet says, if you're an extra cautious person, just sit out the spins,which is costing nothing in a B+M, if any non-hit then reaches the max, then start to bet.
Just been on MPR 16 spins +15 units just watching the trot.
Only trouble on your game is the unrealistic 30 seconds, even Aspers gives 40 seconds on there shitty touchscreens.

Aspers there the biggest cleverest bunch of c unts, if you want to know why go to one of there B+M's, if you've got any brains you'll understand what they've achieved,with you using the touchscreens, wont be long till Grosvenor, Genting and the other B+M's follow suit

[Steve]

is there a specific algorithm that determines what the trot is, and what to bet?

[nottophammer]

is there a specific algorithm that determines what the trot is how would i know i'm no maths whiz, , and what to bet? What to bet, you just bet the non-hit, but you need to know something about how over 37 to 40 spins, non-hit can come or distributed as the math guys would say.

Now i've posted umpteen sheets showing the trot, i've even gone as far as, to show how to use the non-hit with ROTT, Riddle Of The Trot.
Back to you steve, oh i suppose you'll say it dont change the odds etc; correct, but what the sheet shows is avg, i'll take it all day long, the more games played the more accurate that avg and max becomes.

[nottophammer]

Morts #'s  non-hit,+50, or take 1st profit



Game over man, even at spin 100 still in profit, game over man, the late Bill Paxton

[Steve]

Bill is dead? I don't watch tv news its stupid.
Bugger he was one of my favorites.

[nottophammer]

Bill is dead? I don't watch tv news its stupid.
Bugger he was one of my favorites.

Brilliant in aliens

[Madi]

 . You will find the odds of one number spinning next is still 1 in 37. This is my point. Dont debate it further, just test.


How does ur computer change this odd in next spin where the payout 1:35. How does the computer increase the accuracy where nothing can tell what is the next spin?

[Steve]

Brilliant in aliens

Yes and that's one of my all-time favorite movies.

How does ur computer change this odd in next spin where the payout 1:35. How does the computer increase the accuracy where nothing can tell what is the next spin?

Of course there are ways of predicting the next spin. Just not with methods that don't work.

Roulette computers measure the speed of the rotor and ball to predict where the ball will land. There's a lot more to it, but this is the basic explanation. It is the most direct and logical way to predict spins. There are other ways, but this approach is most accurate.

Some people think I'm biased towards roulette computers for personal reasons. The truth is simpler. They just work best. Can anyone think of a more direct approach to predict winning numbers? (without interfering with the wheel) I'd say precognition, and that's why I developed the app to develop methods (speaking of which we need to do testing soon).

Some people might also say i'm biased to AP. Actually AP is just a term for "what works". There is always this BS rift between APs and system players. The APs dont care about a system player's approach. But they'll often try to explain why some approaches wont work, and this is perceived as arrogance.

[Madi]

So is your computer correct everytime? Does it suggest flat bet? How can you use that in casino . They even dont allow phone there.how many number ur computer bet each time?

[Steve]

So is your computer correct everytime?

No and it doesnt need to be. How is 93% win rate with 3 neighbor bets (15 numbers)? See the video at link:s://:.roulette-computers.com/ (public group demo). Its about a +120% edge, when the house edge is just -2.7%

Does it suggest flat bet?

You can either flat bet or use progression. You get few losing streaks so progression is safe enough.

How can you use that in casino

The same way it is used in a demo, except it is never visible in the casino

They even dont allow phone there

Ive never not been allowed a phone in the casino. Its only a problem if you use it out in the open while playing, but it is all hidden.

how many number ur computer bet each time?

Anywhere from 1 to 15 in most cases. The most you will typically "need" to bet is 3 numbers.

Anyway let's not discuss my computers here. You can contact me privately or start another thread if you want to know, or just see my sites.

[Madi]

Ok will see the vedio. Seems to me u r very rich by now using that.👍

[Steve]

You wouldnt believe me if I told you. But winning approach or not, the limit is still what the casino will let you win, before doing something about you. In some casinos, it might only be a few thousand dollars. Most of my more successful partners plat high stakes with often $10k+ per spin. But its not something you can do every day. Avoiding detection is the main issue.