• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Simple betting idea.

Started by praline, Jun 21, 04:41 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

praline

Hello, like-minders!

I want to propose you a simple strategy to loose or to win.

First of all we need to creat 4 groups.
We take  r/b and combine them in groups of 2, obtaining four groups
RR
BB
RB
BR.

Now we need a piece of paper (any small sheet of paper is 👍,  but better the recycled one).
So, if you have followed the advice, you are in front of a rrecycled sheet of paper with 4 groups written on it.

Begin to track groups by writting:
1 2 3 or 4

F.e.
1
2
1
2
2
3
4
3
2
1
4
1
1
1
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

Now comes the betselection, based on a repeat of one group:
1 bet g1 if it is possible in next spin
2 bet 1 and 2 if possible, if in conflict we don't. Bet
1 1 win start tracking again from the last group (1) and bet if g1 is possible
2
2
3
4
3
2
1
4
1
1
1
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

In the end we will have combinations like this

121
122
2343
32141
11
11


I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

The great thing is that we will always have a one combination that repeats, and it will never be more then length 5.

Hope to hear any thoughts on this one...
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

I will reply to all your questions on this bet selection.
And i will be more then happy to code your ideas on this betselection with rx.(when i have time)
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

falkor2k15

Yeah, you've captured more spins by basing your cycles on 2-spin pigeons. But I would prefer to know any simple ideas using 1-spin pigeons... your idea is not that simple and the events and cycles take longer to form, so there is not enough betting opportunities to call simple. So how to capture more wins instead of spins?

Ever come across a system where you bet dozen 2 if it's position 2, but if dozen 2 instead is position 3 then you don't bet?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

praline

I don't understand your last post.
Can you please count pigeons and holes in this system?

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Jun 21, 05:00 PM 2017Ever come across a system where you bet dozen 2 if it's position 2, but if dozen 2 instead is position 3 then you don't bet?

Yeah, i tried it, i even explaind to you and donik the exact way that green sheet was played..(my fault). You'are wellcome.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

falkor2k15

Quote from: praline on Jun 21, 05:06 PM 2017
I don't understand your last post.
Can you please count pigeons and holes in this system?

Yeah, i tried it, i even explaind to you and donik the exact way that green sheet was played..(my fault). You'are wellcome.
You've got 4 pigeons - 4 groups comprising 2 spins each.

That green sheet was played six dozen options mechanical for the first available repeat. You didn't explain the occasional bets that were different. We appreciate you correlating that method to the sheet - but we already knew how to play that method independent of the sheet. We used order instead of position, remember? Regardless, It doesn't lead to any edge. Your only advice was to find a strategy based on averages and 6-7 events.

The Journey part 1 is a much better exercise to study compared to the green sheet because Priyanka attempts to apply the mechanical bets, dynamically, against the order of the previous defining element. Again, I'm grateful for all your help and did preserve the highlights of our discussions, but there hasn't been anything exclusive/valuable shared, and no hints have led to any eureka moments.

Everything given a "holding back" disclaimer has turned out to be way too overrated, and I think the only really great contribution that could potentially save years of testing came from rrbb/reddwarf about fruit universes, hedging bets, cheaper investment and breaking even during a cycle. So far nothing else has been shared of any significance besides basic cycles and general info about non-random methods and limits - though Priyanka and co would like to think that their hints have some illuminating answers encoded within them. It's like someone telling me "I have error message 101 - how can I fix it?"; they assume I know what application they are talking about, and that they have provided just enough information to effectively communicate their problem - but they are oblivious to the fact that without naming the application their information is insufficient.

But that doesn't mean Priyanka was wrong about her claims; she just hasn't provided enough information even though she assumes "it's all there". Packets of information have been broadcast - but there's no error checking in terms of it having reached the destination. I think a working method can just about be gleaned after about a years work building on Priyanka's various discussions - but certainly not obtainable in the way Priyanka would have expected it to be decoded from her writings. Red revealed more.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

praline

I don't have TheHolyGrail.

MoneyT101

I think everyone just frustrated.  We all been working hard to get to the end of the journey and just when we are about to get some more information to guide us.  Someone from the forum has to come and mess it up.

Falkor, i do think Pri shared.  Its just we all arent putting the information together the correct way.   Remember she shared the concept!

What i find funny is that im sure all know how she played quads.  But no one wants to play that way lol

Is it because we assume there is more?

Praline nice method.  what type of progression you use for this?
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

falkor2k15

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Jun 21, 06:27 PM 2017
Falkor, i do think Pri shared.  Its just we all arent putting the information together the correct way.   Remember she shared the concept!

What i find funny is that im sure all know how she played quads.  But no one wants to play that way lol

Is it because we assume there is more?
Regardless of their merits, don't assume you have been given all the pieces of the puzzle. Most of it is deception and outright lies to lead us into a false sense of security. Separating fact from fiction is the challenge we face - like trying to put together accurate history.

VdW/Quads is on my list of things to test - but there's still parts to that strategy that have not been revealed.

There are definitely secrets still to be clarified: Stitching for better odds? Playing catch up? Opposite of CL3 that turns a losing game into a winning game? Missing out cycle lengths? Follow the last? Dozens taking on higher odds and less odds? Magical relationship between 2 cycles? Different types of parachuting? The list goes on...
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

praline

Till now i don't understand any possible vdw application, last time i tried vdw when i saw a tic tac toe reminder on falkors forum, thats helped a bit to create new possible ways of application.
I have figured the exact way of play on priyanka's quad videos but when i coded that on rx, it passes all video spins but it's not perform as described on other spins from hoenesburg. Same thing with green sheet... The priblem is that even if we discovered together the green sheet betting plan, you have never shared other steps that i was blind to see.
Now i am more concentrated on stats, hoping to find some kind of relation between different streems.
Outside the box topik is the must for everyone, i think some of you didn't appreciate the disequalizaition of events that it gives, and the way it can show you to discover more disbalances.
I hope that in the end we all remain friends, the only thing is that in the middle of our journey we have chosed different ways to continue.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

MoneyT101

Quote from: praline on Jun 21, 08:32 PM 2017
Till now i don't understand any possible vdw application, last time i tried vdw when i saw a tic tac toe reminder on falkors forum, thats helped a bit to create new possible ways of application.
I have figured the exact way of play on priyanka's quad videos but when i coded that on rx, it passes all video spins but it's not perform as described on other spins from hoenesburg. Same thing with green sheet... The priblem is that even if we discovered together the green sheet betting plan, you have never shared other steps that i was blind to see.
Now i am more concentrated on stats, hoping to find some kind of relation between different streems.
Outside the box topik is the must for everyone, i think some of you didn't appreciate the disequalizaition of events that it gives, and the way it can show you to discover more disbalances.
I hope that in the end we all remain friends, the only thing is that in the middle of our journey we have chosed different ways to continue.

The quad video used vdw on the s/d, maybe thats why it might be off

The problem i have with outside the box thread;  is that i cant play that at the casino and without a spreadsheet for tracking after each spin.

Whats the green sheet?
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole


praline

"The quad video used vdw on the s/d, maybe thats why it might be off"

But do you agree that the "primary" selection is "this..."?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

-