The Onion Method

[Steve]

Presumably this is what you meant.

[iar000]

What is TG method .....

[vladir]

Can we see what this TG method is?

[Steve]

I believe he gave enough clues to explain his system, which i explained a few posts back. Its really no different to other progression systems.

[denzie]

I believe he gave enough clues to explain his system, which i explained a few posts back. Its really no different to other progression systems.

Yes he did. But it's a puzzle though. And you didn't explain it correct . It's not with cycles. The cycles are explained to know what will come......

Anyway It's off topic here

[vladir]

Yes he did. But it's a puzzle though. And you didn't explain it correct . It's not with cycles. The cycles are explained to know what will come......

Anyway It's offr topic here

Is there a topic where I can see the original explanation from TG please?

[Taotie]

It will all be in here somewhere, but you will have to join the forum and log in to view it.


GF/search/3251348/

[Taotie]

Nothing ken has posted actually works.

This sums it up nicely.

You can confidently take it even further and say, nothing ken has done actually works.

[RouletteGhost]

I'll never understand the purpose of staying on forums just to bash people and not actually talk about what the forums designed for

Ken has been over there for a long time

Don't think he's posted anything really worth reading. Just bitter comments

Turbo for some weird reason likes him. Has also told him today that people derail threads instead of making their own....he must be blind to what mister j does.

What a weird forum that place is

[Steve]

ken is a guy with many problems. He says stupid things with twisted deluded logic. But believe it or not, i know worse people. Bago is one of them. He is one of the dumbest people ive ever dealt with, who recites comments from smarter people to make himself look smart. he's one of the people i consider literally mentally ill.  also blatant liar to avoid looking stupid.  a long story but he literally may be handicapped. he was laughed off my player form. i dont think ive ever known anyone to like him, anywhere.

i dont think turbo likes ken. turbo has at least enough sense to know ken is a dick. but turbo has his support. notice ken really kissing turbos ass? he did the same to cakeb, but caleb knows what ken is regardless. just a dick. ken kisses anyones ass that doesnt call him a dick. Lets just say ken doesnt have many friends.

Im an expert at dealing with dicks. Ive handled so many of them in my life. im sure nobody has dealt with more dicks than than me. im seriously considering writing a book about how to deal with them.

[Steve]

im joking about handling dicks (really). but not about the book. i might interest people considering trolls and dicks are a large problem on the internet. i would not write it for profit. it would be a genuine attempt to help people with dicks

and the word of the day is... dicks

[Steve]

Anyway It's off topic here

Unless a thread creator strictly wants a thread to stay on topic, i dont believe in enforcing a "stay in topic" policy because it would disrupt natural flow of conversation. there is a benefit to staying on topic, but i think the flow of conversation is more important because many topic are related.

[bigmoney]

Where is mr j ?

[RouletteGhost]

Hopefully an insane asylum roomed with falkor.

[Pogo]

Hi denzie

Just a question - if that one session goes negative how much will it cost in terms of sessions win ? Thanx

That would be one br. Which can be gained back in 1-4 sessions.

Although you could just keep going but with real money I don't do that. The more you play the more you get a feel for it. And if it doesn't go as I wish I might reset early. (Although I don't have to)

I am not sure how big your bank roll is denzie, but a losing session should not take it all. The session would have to be a very unusual one to do that (cheating RNG comes to mind). In most cases you will always win or have a very small loss that is recoverable in the next cycle.  That is just from my testing anyway, I have not had any large losing cycles yet.  You might be playing it different to the way I do.

I have tested on both RNG and live dealer numbers and so far have not had a big enough loss to take my initial bank roll.  The initial downturn can be large and scary, which is why you need a good sized bankroll, but if you have calculated the positive progression correctly you will, 99% of the time win back all of the initial losses by the end of each cycle.

This is my take on what turbogenius has said anyway.