Ideas To Pursue

[Steve]

I keep repeating "you need to increase accuracy of predictions". Why is mostly explained at :.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/

You should know AP works, but most people arent suited to it. So let's look at other ways.

Anyway here are some ideas you may want to consider. Whether or not they work, at least they are different. Everyone needs to be trying new things:


1. Fractals

2. Fibonacci Spirals

Some good information here:
link:s://:.gamblersforum.com/index.php?threads/electronic-roulette-theories.7750/page-2



3. Waves Within Waves

See link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/waves.pdf
(not in the same way as the law of a third)



4. Precognition

See link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18276.0 (I haven't had time to organize and do more group trials). There are quite conclusive trials that indicate the approach is valid, and it can be enhanced with equipment.



5. Curve Extrapolation

This is more of a longshot, but maybe you could find a mathematical formula to predict a temporary bias of Red/Black (just for the next 20 or so spins), like with the Fibonacci spiral. I've seen such models work for other things, so maybe it could apply for casino games. This goes against what I've previously said about sequences, but the sequences viable for computers to check are much shorter than 20 spins, because such large sequences need trillions of spins. Probably even more.


Overall I believe precognition and related approaches have the best chance. I've said it before: I believe precognition and related phenomena will be the next advantage play. I believe it has more potential than any other method. However, it would realistically take more discipline and the right mindset, which most players don't have.

[DoctorSudoku]

Given your "mathematically-oriented" list above, then why leave out VDW and other similar Arithmetic Progression-based methods?

[Steve]

Please give a brief explanation about the working principles of the methods you mentioned. ie how are they supposed to increase the accuracy of predictions?

[Steve]

I have an idea to use fractals. I think at the very least it will slightly increase accuracy of predictions - even for RNG. I did find a way to slightly increase accuracy with fractals before but the increase was far too small to make a difference. Maybe it was at least a good starting point. The new idea might have better results. And if it doesnt, at least it was something new to try.

Existing fractal software wont do what is needed for the test, as far as I'm aware.

We'll still do the precognition trials but that requires me to be at the server. I could use macros to automate the process but that has its own issues.

Anyway before I hire a programmer to test my idea, are there any competent programmers here?

[maestro]

what is a fractal...if you could explain

[Steve]

They are repetitive patterns found everywhere in nature. See the video for example. Also google golden spiral in nature

[maestro]

ok thanks..

[maestro]

so Steve you say that if i give you four fixed points on the plane you will outguess with better probability what direction you got to travel from you randomly chosen point inside the 4 fixed points of the plane...(four points is because you got say 3 dozens and zero)...

[Mortagon]

They are repetitive patterns found everywhere in nature.

The strategies are governed by nature.
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16652.msg157683#msg157683

[Taotie]

Steve would struggle to find a root in a brothel.

[Steve]

so Steve you say that if i give you four fixed points on the plane you will outguess with better probability what direction you got to travel from you randomly chosen point inside the 4 fixed points of the plane...(four points is because you got say 3 dozens and zero)...

No its much more complicated. I'll explain another time. I need to do more testing before i explain it.

[Steve]

Steve would struggle to find a root in a brothel.

I wouldn't put my tackle anywhere near a prostitute. But I don't agree with you. I don't think I'd struggle.

[Taotie]

Tackle?

That's not tackle, it's a hand line.. 


Sorry, I'll stop being a dick now. I can't promise forever, but for a while.

[Steve]

[Taotie]

I do have an idea to pursue.

How about giving the game over to luck?

I'll spare you all the mathematics that supports this statement, but the harsh reality for system players, and you can throw in "method" players as well, is that every time you win it's due to luck.

So why not create a bet selection that holds itself together or loses at an except able rate when luck is absent, yet creates growth when luck is present?

Then include a MM that supports the bet selection in it's efforts, rather than try to brute force a win.