Ideas To Pursue

[Taotie]

Steve, as you know I'm always lurking in the background on these forums, and yes your tackle looks very good.

So can you see the log behind it?

[maestro]

wonder where is freaking fish..

[Steve]

So can you see the log behind it?

I see two, close together, swordfighter.

[Steve]

I do have an idea to pursue.

How about giving the game over to luck?

I'll spare you all the mathematics that supports this statement, but the harsh reality for system players, and you can throw in "method" players as well, is that every time you win it's due to luck.

So why not create a bet selection that holds itself together or loses at an except able rate when luck is absent, yet creates growth when luck is present?

Then include a MM that supports the bet selection in it's efforts, rather than try to brute force a win.

Yes its luck if the system doesnt work. The MM you described is bet amounts propotionate to your bankroll. When winning, play larger bets with the casinos money. When losing, decrease bets.

[Steve]

yes your tackle looks very good.

Even more alarming.

Now i understand the meaning behind that parcel you sent me.

[Taotie]

When winning, play larger bets with the casinos money. When losing, decrease bets.

That's good in principal, but it really doesn't work because you can never know when the worm will turn.

MM needs to let luck take over, also.

[Taotie]

Even more alarming.

Now i understand the meaning behind that parcel you sent me.

You were supposed to eat it, not stick it up your butt.

[Steve]

Bit late now.. still worked though

[Steve]

That's good in principal, but it really doesn't work because you can never know when the worm will turn.

It at least allows the player to stay at the table longer. Yes it does nothing for long term winnings. Only increasing accuracy of predictions does that.

[Taotie]

Increasing accuracy of predictions is a luxury that most if not all can't perform.
I can predict EC's at 55% or a little better. It is not enough.

Must find another way, as I have done.

[Taotie]

Bit late now.. still worked though

Nice, I mean ouch, I mean nice.

...I don't now what I mean anymore.

[Taotie]

wonder where is freaking fish..

Right there, in the water.

Hahaha!

[DoctorSudoku]

I can predict EC's at 55% or a little better. It is not enough.

Taotie (Bombus / Skakus / Green Guy),

Can you somehow transfer this 55% EC prediction rate over to baccarat (that is, in terms of banker vs player)?

In roulette, a 55% accuracy rate may not be enough to surmount the effects of the zeroes.

However, if you can do that in baccarat, you are very much in or near HG territory.

[DoctorSudoku]

Oh, another thing:

Once you accomplish the above, make sure that you publicize it on betselection.cc -- even alrelax would want to become your best friend and most devoted disciple ! 

[boshkodj]

Taotie (Bombus / Skakus / Green Guy),

Can you somehow transfer this 55% EC prediction rate over to baccarat (that is, in terms of banker vs player)?

In roulette, a 55% accuracy rate may not be enough to surmount the effects of the zeroes.

However, if you can do that in baccarat, you are very much in or near HG territory.

How do you mean 55% accuracy "may not be enough"? If you play European wheel, then you have 2.3% player's edge, which converts to let's say 2 units in 100 spins. 1000 spins a day simply flat betting would bring you 20 units. If it's a mechanical bet selection, create a bot and play on 5 different casinos at the same time. 100 units a day is an enourmous profit.