Ideas To Pursue

[DoctorSudoku]

How do you mean 55% accuracy "may not be enough"?

I am in the US (land of double zero roulette), so I face a 5.26% (or thereabouts) house edge. And a 55% accuracy rate on the ECs may not be enough to make this a consistently winning bet (CWB) for me (and others who are here).  I wrote my previous reply (that you quoted) from my US double zero-based perspective.

[DoctorSudoku]

An addition to my previous post.

Ã,,ctually, it was Taotie who made the comment in Reply # 24, that "ït may not be enough."

"It" refers to his 55% accuracy rate for the ECs.

He is -- I think -- based in Australia where they have single zero wheels.

So it would be better if you ask him the question that you asked me.

[cht]

If you can gain consistently 5 units per 1000 hands in bacs, you have a very good system, the profit potential is enormous.

Look for 5units per 1000hands/spins, that's all you ever need - consistent with low drawdown.

[Taotie]

Taotie (Bombus / Skakus / Green Guy),

Can you somehow transfer this 55% EC prediction rate over to baccarat (that is, in terms of banker vs player)?

In roulette, a 55% accuracy rate may not be enough to surmount the effects of the zeroes.

However, if you can do that in baccarat, you are very much in or near HG territory.

You can but baccarat is very limiting with only 1 set of results. Roulette gives you 3 sets to play with.

A 55% strike rate overall, still exposes the player to lengthy losses, that's why I don't think it's enough.

[Taotie]

Taotie (Bombus / Skakus / Green Guy),

You forgot trilobite on roulette30 forum, and newly registered Marshall Bing Bell on rouletteforum.net

[Herby]

A 55% strike rate overall, still exposes the player to lengthy losses, that's why I don't think it's enough.

So maybe you are just thinking that you have a 55% strike rate. 

[precogmiles]

Has anyone attempted to investigate any of these other ideas?

[FlyinHawaiian18]

Question, If you guys sat down to a roulette table and play'd what ever strategy.. and won, lets say 2 sessions. How many of you would keep on playing? and if yes why?

[Kairomancer]

I come up with an idea or an experimental ritual on what does it really take to "think outside the box".

First I shall define what it really means to me.
Basically it implies that you need to reach something beyond what you consider yourself.
It involves an expanded state of awereness that goes beyond your current ideas and definition or self-identifications.
From your current state of ego mind you will need to rise beyond itself or see through the mirrors.
It involves an ego death or something akin to a near death experience.
Obviously I will not recommend anything to impose danger on yourself, but I come up with an idea on how to achieve something similar experience in your dreams.

Let me know if you are interested, so I will share the experimental ritual.

[winforus]

I come up with an idea or an experimental ritual on what does it really take to "think outside the box".

First I shall define what it really means to me.
Basically it implies that you need to reach something beyond what you consider yourself.
It involves an expanded state of awereness that goes beyond your current ideas and definition or self-identifications.
From your current state of ego mind you will need to rise beyond itself or see through the mirrors.
It involves an ego death or something akin to a near death experience.
Obviously I will not recommend anything to impose danger on yourself, but I come up with an idea on how to achieve something similar experience in your dreams.

Let me know if you are interested, so I will share the experimental ritual.

Have you experienced or have you ever done a psychedelic substance? They can be extremely effective tools for accomplishing what you are describing here. In fact, I would say there is nothing more effective.

[Kairomancer]

I did, and I prefer not to use them any longer.

[The General]

Have you experienced or have you ever done a psychedelic substance? They can be extremely effective tools for accomplishing what you are describing here. In fact, I would say there is nothing more effective.

How about Gas Ex?

[Steve]

Don't knock psychedelics. They'll humble anyone.

[Kairomancer]

How about Gas Ex?

Thanks, just bought some branded simethicon.
I have terrible gas spasm related pain for the last few days.
Hope it will help me out.

[GLC]

The article on roulette physics is worth reading multiple times.  I spent a lot of enjoyable hours proving it for myself.
If you read all of my articles, you will find my simplified way of saying the same thing.  "If there's a spin result that can cause you to lose, eventually it will hit enough times close enough together to cause you to lose." 
Flatino, Ivica Boban, RIP my friend, thought he had found a winning system.  He played at casinos all around the world winning over $200,000 dollars in a little over a year.  He had the Holy Grail.  Or did he?  He finally hit a losing streak that was taking it all back.  Fortunately he had enough savvy to stop short of going broke.  It's okay to play a system that you like, but never risk money you can't afford to lose!!  Have fun in both testing and playing...