Turbo Denzie or is it Denzie Turbo

[RouletteGhost]

falkor, I don't know how you arrived at these probabilities, can you explain?

Apparently in an insanely complex mind, riddled with conspiracy, it is difficult to grasp the fact that the next spin has an equal chance to be any of the three dozens.

Dafuq am I reading.

[MoneyT101]

Priyanka admired his teachings were not a holy grail

You people are delusional

Priyanka said it, the teachings can lead to an edge just needs to be used differently.   After being attacked to share the concept instead of teaching the whole tone changed.

That's beside the point.  Believe what you want on that but my point is there is a way to play with an edge based on playing different layers( multiple games at the same time)

Like a parrondo paradox but not exactly because roulette is negative expectation.  But a game can be created to have similar features.

[Bayes]

That's the idea, playing multiple games at the same time.  AT CERTAIN POINTS EACH GAME WINS!  With different payouts and the effect is breaking even or profit!

Sounds good. But at a certain point all games will fail. At that point you may be well ahead, or maybe not. The way I see it is every system has its nemesis event. It's not that hard to find the nememis, just keeping picking numbers which make the system fail. then you can work out the probability of it happening. For the holy grail, the probability of the nemesis event occurring is zero.  You might get close to it, but you'll never quite reach it.

[Bayes]

falkor, thanks for the link. I really can't make any sense of what that calculation is supposed to be showing, but let's look at it from a common sense point of view; forget tree diagrams and probability calculations.

Spin 1 : 3rd dozen arrives.

Now, I'm assuming that you agree that we don't know which dozen is going to come next (ignore zero for simplicity), so in that case it's reasonable to say that there are 3 equal chances corresponding to the 3 dozens, yes?

We're looking for a repeat of dozen 3. There are 2 ways we can be wrong and 1 way we can be correct, agree with me so far?

[RouletteGhost]

The poor soul legitimately doesn't understand that the next spins can be any dozen.

[777]

Hi Denzie,
long time no see.
I see you finally figured it out. Congrats man!
From the little I know you, I think you have had some breakthrough results, or else you wouldn't have come up with the challenge. you aint a bullshitter. Unfortunately nobody else have a winning system to challenge you. It would have been an interesting challenge to watch.

Unfortunately im still on the pen and paper. but I think your theory is that you wont have 3 losing sessions in a row. from the few tests that I have done I never even got 2 in a row. em I right? (I hope you answer me )

I really hope you have found it and it keeps holding on.


To Steve,

After many years I came to the same conclusion as you, a year ago. You have to increase the prediction to have an edge of winning. I have read and tried most strategies but none works. I think ignatius have proved that to everyone, as he has tested every possible combination. many thanks to him. Your computers costs more than most people are willing to give for something not that are not 100% (Im not saying it doesn't work Im just says you never know until you have tried it). but how about proving to everyone that it works by having it tested in an B&M casino that is broadcasted online. like dragonara or similar. you could say the prediction of the computer and any one interested could follow it online and be convinced.

[Steve]

Or how about just letting people test them on any wheel they want? I already do that.

[777]

Sorry Steve! i wasn't aware of that. We don't have any B&M casinos in Norway unfortunately. I was thinking it would be easier to do it at an online broadcasted wheel. since then it would be impossible to get detected. It would also be great if it worked on airball machines. is that something that might come in the future?

[Steve]

Some airballs are easier, most are harder to beat. Airball isn't real roulette. Its manipulated junk. Half rng.

[777]

thanx ill keep away from the airball then

[RouletteGhost]

Airball is a touchy subject. I'm sure they can be manipulated

I do believe some are random. The rotor speeds just change

[RouletteGhost]

Priyanka said it, the teachings can lead to an edge just needs to be used differently.   After being attacked to share the concept instead of teaching the whole tone changed.

That's beside the point.  Believe what you want on that but my point is there is a way to play with an edge based on playing different layers( multiple games at the same time)

Like a parrondo paradox but not exactly because roulette is negative expectation.  But a game can be created to have similar features.

The edge cannot be changed.

[nottophammer]

What's going on here?

All credits goes to TG. I simply figured his stuff out with some others.Who are the others? But seriously. .... BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! !!!!!!! 

Airball is a touchy subject.Well Morts and J247 play ok.

Some airballs are easier, most are harder to beat. Airball isn't real roulette. Its manipulated junk. Half rng. Yeah, BLA,BLA,BLA

So start after 20th betting 6#'s, as they hit move them down, so 1st of hot 6 is #33, who remains hot


If you can't see i'll place all hit #'s at there position, but come on work it out.

[Steve]

So there we have it.. 1 whole hour of spins that prove nottos HG.

[nottophammer]

So there we have it.. 1 whole hour of spins that prove nottos HG.

Not mine Steve perhaps theres a clue in the tittle 
At least ef-bet have sensible spin time, unlike your ridiculous MPR, which is only playable if you use outside bets.
With the idea coming from the clue in the tittle, you can place units on field, but when a game starts all 37 are due the larger group, which MPR does not allow unlike ef-bet where one could place the larger group, even Grosvenor has longer spin time than MPR
So you'll have to be jizzed