Turbo Denzie or is it Denzie Turbo

[Madi]

I believe he wont answer.
I am answering you.

Play 3 to 4 cycle of 37 spin. Maximum number bet 3-5 some cases 6. Average 3 better. Progression 1-5-25 . Could be any depend how deep u gone. 1-5-10 or 1-3-9. U always dont need progression. Sometimes it win flat sometimes u need progression

[RouletteGhost]

It's pretty cut and dry

In 37 spins you won't have 37 different numbers

In most cycles you will have a 3 peater at a minimum

That's where the profit comes in

Sure, the math guys say the house edge doesn't change. BUT if you play a progression on the numbers that repeat you will profit. If not this cycle, then the next cycle.

Go into zumma or any other roulette number source. Cut out 37 spin logs. Almost all will have a 3 peater

As far as falkor goes, Steve the forum ignore feature doesn't work. Which means we have to see this clown

[Steve]

RG I posted instructions to ignore users. Are you adding the username in the box?

Sure, the math guys say the house edge doesn't change. BUT if you play a progression on the numbers that repeat you will profit. If not this cycle, then the next cycle.

You never know which will repeat, with any change in accuracy.

[Madi]

You know steve even ahead of time. No need to know which number. Block the road where the thief enter. After 37 spin u got
3s: 27
18
23
2 this comes on 3s
Bet 2 and 27
35 is on 3s bet on
25
30
17 3s bet on
24
2 u got it.

See u know from those 4 u will get one even ahead of time that they will land on 4s

[Madi]

This sequence is from ur multi player.

[Steve]

It's that easy to beat roulette?

[Madi]

No. Not all time u get this easy. Sometimes u will fail or there will be a lot of number and nothing will work. Then have to accept loses in my opinion.but in that way i can bet small amount of number

[Steve]

Then that's no different to random bet selection. Sometimes win, sometimes lose. Mostly you lose.

[Madi]

I think most of the time u win. U can do with random number but that number could end up as sleeper.hot can get cold and then sleeper as well.But as u changing number continiously chance is less. Its cant happen all time that the hot numbe u r on get sleep immidiately u bet on that. May be you r right as u r more experienced. That the logic till now

[DoctorSudoku]

I believe he wont answer.
I am answering you.

Play 3 to 4 cycle of 37 spin. Maximum number bet 3-5 some cases 6. Average 3 better. Progression 1-5-25 . Could be any depend how deep u gone. 1-5-10 or 1-3-9. U always dont need progression. Sometimes it win flat sometimes u need progression

Thanks for your answer. I have done a lot of paper testing on repeaters during the last few months. My experience has been that sometimes the 3-peaters and the 4-peaters come early in the cycle -- in that case, you win flat betting.

When they don't come in a reasonable amount of time, you are forced into negative progression territory -- and depending on how many numbers you are betting, that territory can be quite deep and scary !!

[denzie]

I believe he wont answer.
I am answering you.

Play 3 to 4 cycle of 37 spin. Maximum number bet 3-5 some cases 6. Average 3 better. Progression 1-5-25 . Could be any depend how deep u gone. 1-5-10 or 1-3-9. U always dont need progression. Sometimes it win flat sometimes u need progression

Very nice but we all know that won't work on the long run

[denzie]

Denzie, what you have is random bets with progression. I know you've been winning so far. Most progressions are profitable for a while. You'll eventually see what I mean but for now you can believe I'm wrong.

Steve...If i'm not mistaken it's now 2017 right ? So that means we don't have to test with pen and paper anymore right ? In fact there are things that do that for us with a speed so fast you can run million of sessions in just a day. So.....Is 100 million spins enough to know if something works ? Or we need more? Billions,  kazillions, ....

As I said....Well Tested 

[Steve]

Talk is cheap. But if you or anyone really had the hg, Id pay a fortune for it. Then id have my teams use it with remote access software that doesn't require disclosure. This would mean millions easily. If you had the hg, you could do the same. But you would do better by using my established teams. But i don't think you'd do that. You're happy with smaller wins right?

The clues from you and turbo indicate an ongoing tracking of hot numbers. That approach doesn't work but really id love to be proven wrong.

I can't prove you haven't tested millions of spins. I just don't believe you have.

[denzie]

But i don't think you'd do that. You're happy with smaller wins right?

Depends what you call small. If I can make few k each session I'm ok with that.



I can't prove you haven't tested millions of spins. I just don't believe you have.

That's cool. Can't believe everything in life right. Especially on these type of forums.

[cht]

Talk is cheap. But if you or anyone really had the hg, Id pay a fortune for it. Then id have my teams use it with remote access software that doesn't require disclosure. This would mean millions easily. If you had the hg, you could do the same. But you would do better by using my established teams. But i don't think you'd do that. You're happy with smaller wins right?

The clues from you and turbo indicate an ongoing tracking of hot numbers. That approach doesn't work but really id love to be proven wrong.

I can't prove you haven't tested millions of spins. I just don't believe you have.

How does the idea get protected as it's revealed ?