Turbo Denzie or is it Denzie Turbo

[nottophammer]

Credit where its due

[denzie]

Credit where its due

What's going on here?

All credits goes to TG. I simply figured his stuff out with some others. But seriously. .... BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! !!!!!!! 

[nottophammer]

EC's ? Dozens? Naaaah. BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !  Forget my old topics. I've moved on. And so should we all do. Don't stay stuck in the same methods that didn't work and never will......

I've moved on.  Don't stay stuck in the same methods that didn't work all the time.  BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE.

So Den it seems we've studied well, taken on board the good, thrown out the chaff. But we still have to watch non-hit as they give the repeat, so lessons learned from non-hit class are a must. Like how often do we see a repeat in spins1-10, answer more than we see 10/10, how many 1 hit from 1-10 can we take to spins 11-20. Why does 8 and i'm not meaning the number 8 come into the play of so many methods. Just part of lessons learnt on this forum.

[Steve]

The only time numbers hit above average is with a biased wheel.  Its a very well established and thoroughly tested fact.

[DoctorSudoku]

I give full credit to Denzie for getting me initially interested in the profit potential of hot numbers (or "hotties").

I also give credit to Nottop in this matter -- he is also a big proponent of betting on repeaters. I just wish his explanations for all his charts were a little bit more understandable. 


But, just to reiterate, I give total credit (and thanks) to Denzie and Nottop for getting me interested in this repeater number bet selection methodology.

[Steve]

You are going to eventually find hot numbers spin just as often as cold numbers, after you decide if a number is hot or cold.

Don't take my word, just test properly.

[Madi]

@steve

Run some cycle of spins and show us its no different. Let us learn something from you. Not just throw a theory. We already know the game is negative cant be beaten in long run in theory. But in practicle lots of people r winning continiously

[maestro]

The only time numbers hit above average is with a biased wheel.

so every time i run spin file of say 200 spins is from biased wheel...because i can see that there is always a group of numbers being wacked more than others....so many biased wheels

[Steve]

Run some cycle of spins and show us its no different.

I even published free software so anyone can do this for themselves. Problem is people arent using it so they waste time on approaches that have NO EFFECT on the accuracy of predictions. And when there's no change in accuracy, and the payouts are still the same, then NOTHING CHANGES. The player still loses.

[Steve]

so every time i run spin file of say 200 spins is from biased wheel...because i can see that there is always a group of numbers being wacked more than others....so many biased wheels

You are probably referring to the likelihood that the odds are some numbers will be repeats. That's not bias, it's statistics. It is grade 4 statistics.

[Madi]

Payout is same in all cases. If i use devices to predict does it change the payout? What happen actually when a system is based on fallacy? Does it lose very frequently? How many spin does it need to pass?

[maestro]

yeah i am not that good in math..

[Steve]

If i use devices to predict does it change the payout?

Nothing changes the payouts. Odds of winning and the amount paid for wins are two different things.

What happen actually when a system is based on fallacy? Does it lose very frequently?

Depends on how many spins. A progression system can quite easily survive 10,000 spins. But when you lose, you lose all winnings and more.

There could be 100 people all using the same system on different tables.

55% of them lose, 45% of them win. The system overall has lost. The page link:://:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/ has more detail.

[denzie]

But in practicle lots of people r winning continiously

Damn right 
And without that expensive electronics

[denzie]

so every time i run spin file of say 200 spins is from biased wheel...because i can see that there is always a group of numbers being wacked more than others....so many biased wheels

Yes it's bias. Steve says so. If it's a perfect balanced wheel each number gonna hit 5,4 times .