10 against 10 against 10

[RouletteGhost]

I have been doing this for quite some time

It wins

against my better judgement I am posting it

recreational play only with money you can afford to lose

-observe 10 spins. if you want to speed up and bet right away go against the past 10 spins on the board

-you want to bet against the first unique dozen set you see

- the first unique dozen set formed on spins 2, 3, 4 of the first 10 spins set, you now want to bet against that unique dozen set in the next 10 spin sequence in the same location as it was in that sequence of ten spins, so in the new sequence bet against that dozen formation on spins 2, 3, 4 (or spins 13, 14, 15 if you will)

see attachment. here is 3 ten spin sets next to eachother from furthest back to newest

on spins 2, 3, 4 we had dozen sequence 1 2 3, so now we wait until this ten spins concludes....then we bet against 1 2 3 sequence on spins 2, 3, 4 of the next sequence or if you would rather keep a running tally then you can also say bet against what occurred on spins 2, 3, 4 on spins 12, 13, 14

good for a quick buck, no rhyme or reason.

[RouletteGhost]

simplified

unique dozen pattern on spins 4, 5, 6

bet against that pattern on spins 14, 15, 16

repeat

unique patterns are

123
132
213
231
312
321

[Thanatos]

Nice one. With 2 dozen bets its always seem to boils down to "when to play". Like ye ol "grassroots" you bet on dozen 123 dosnt repeat right after 123 just happened aka hoping 123 123 wont happen.

In this system however we always play 10 spins later. Now some say it dosnt matter playing in "sets" of 3 or 5 or 10 and im not saying that they are wrong. But in this case i think there is one thing that does speak for playing in sets .. or at least wait 10 spins untill betting.

Dangerous streaking. We have all seen it happen, that is why we so often bet on hot numbers etc. Like we just had 5 high numbers in a row, then another 5 high numbers cannot possible follow .. but it happens disturbingly often (especially when you put money on the table) that 5 high does follow .. often helped by repeating numbers. In the case of double dozen its like 333 and get another unexpected 333.

Now waiting 10 spins you avoid the shortterm hot/streaks or "wait untill the current pattern is over". Now i dont have any math supporting this and i know im neck deep in fallacy waters. I dont think there is anything special about 10 either, it could be 8 or 12 sets instead, but it should probably be at least 5 or 6 to make sure that whatever "pattern" was played previously is over. Waiting 10 spins is no doubt safer (if you believe my rantings  )

[nottophammer]

Thanatos
look at ef-bet today by Mort, spin 7,8,9 that 1,3,2 happens again 57,58,59

so if win at 17,18,19 is it look in those 10 spins for the new trigger

[RouletteGhost]

The random roulette wheel will rarely produce the same unique dozen pattern in the same exact position in the following ten spins

Not perfect. But it works

[RouletteGhost]

To state the obvious I would severely limit exposure time

The more time you play the more likely to fail or lose

Play for a statistically insignificant number of spins

I would use larger unit size if I was doing a 1 3 9 prog

The statistically insignificant number of spins playing time will be in your favor

See my signature. Even AP guru Caleb said it was a decent quote and he is a tough critic.

[Taotie]

See my signature. Even AP guru Caleb said it was a decent quote and he is a tough critic.

They do add up you know, spins that is.


AKA, hit and run is bulls bollocks.

[RouletteGhost]

They do add up you know, spins that is.


AKA, hit and run is bulls bollocks.

I'll agree to disagree on that. Hit and run a few spins a day can sustain itself for a looooong time. To the point where when a loss occurs there is still profit

But of course it's roulette. No matter how we play there is risk and house edge.

Anything more then money we can afford to lose is foolish

[Taotie]

..Hit and run a few spins a day can sustain itself for a looooong time.

Chicken 

Is it RouletteGhost, or YellowGhost, or ChickenGhost, or RouletteChicken, or YellowGhostChickenRouletteGhost?

[RouletteGhost]

[MoneyT101]

I don't know the math behind it but I like it.

I've played against last 10 EC and that does pretty good.  Yes it fails in the long run, I'm not saying it doesn't.

I'm just saying since it is now 3 possibilities it will be much harder to produce the same pattern.

RG, great method!

[cht]

I made this to test RG's idea. You can use it to help identify the unique 3doz by keying in the spins in column A. Change the lookup table located on the right to columns if you want to play from that angle.

[RouletteGhost]

just to reiterate

the 10 spins cycle can be immediate if you sit down and use the previous 10 spins

if there was a unique dozen sequence on spins 4, 5, 6 then on spins 4, 5, 6 in the next 10 spins cycle you will bet against that sequence

spin/dozen
1    3
2    3
3    1
4    2
5    2
6    1
7    2
8    1
9    3
10  1

spins 2, 3, 4 produced unique sequence, now you will bet against dozen sequence 3 1 2 in the next 10 spins cycle on spins 2, 3, 4

[ozon]

Hi
Once I played all the time against 1-2-3 formation all the time, I did not change the formation.
The tests were short, but from what I figured, at the beginning of the session I was often ahead because the wheel had just gotten tweaked.
I did not run long tests, because in the longrun it does not make sense.

[DoctorSudoku]

Rich,
Thanks for sharing this method. It reminds me of Hermes's mirror method that he proposed a few years back.