10 against 10 against 10

[RouletteGhost]

Thanks for testing Boyd. Now if you have a loss you will still be ahead. That's what I look for in a method because I know the loss will come.

Good job

Yes often there is more then one trigger in ten spins

I've only been testing the first instance in that set

So if spins 2 3 and 4 are unique I stop there and wait until the next ten spins and I ignore the rest of that set

[RouletteGhost]

I wanted to do this 4 times a day with $25 chips

But I am not confident enough yet to risk $650

[3Nine]

I wanted to do this 4 times a day with $25 chips

But I am not confident enough yet to risk $650

You'll need quarters at the B for Labor Day weekend!

[DoctorSudoku]

I laid out a test of actual results

10 spins beside one other

betting against the very first unique dozen formation you see in the 10 spin sequence against the same position of the next 10 spin sequence

success

Rich,
This a little bit off-topic, but I still wanted to mention it.

One thing that I have always liked about your roulette-related explanatory posts are the clear diagrams and tables that you upload to explain your point, like the one above.

They are very well-designed and easy to understand.

I just wish Nottop and Gilius-Falkor would learn from your examples when putting up their own charts (they are frequently unintelligible).

Maybe you can take some time out and  teach them how to do it !   

[RouletteGhost]

thank you

I do it this way because its the easiest way to understand it

I also like to post in a way that I would fully understand it

falkor posts knowing very well people won't get it. it is counter productive and rude.

[DoctorSudoku]

We tend to criticize Gilius-Falkor for his unintelligible charts, but I think Nottop's charts are nearly as difficult to understand.

Nottop does provide textual explanations to go along with his charts, but they are difficult to understand as well (too many run-on sentences, sentence fragments, excessive use of commas, non-standard punctuation, etc., etc.).

Don't get me wrong -- his posts do have meaningful stuff in them. That is why it is such a shame that a lot of his efforts are wasted because his posts are so difficult to make sense of.

[RouletteGhost]

just tested 70 spins

3 triggers

all wins

little disappointed in the lack of triggers but overall happy


1 2 1 1 1 2 2
1 2 2 1 3 3 2
1 2 3 1 1 3 3
1 2 2 1 3 3 3
0 2 1 0 1 2 1
3 3 2 3 3 3 1
2 2 2 3 1 3 3
2 2 1 1 1 3 1
1 1 2 1 1 2 2
1 2 1 1 2 1 2

[boyd30]

I wanted to do this 4 times a day with $25 chips

But I am not confident enough yet to risk $650

That is wise, better to wait and see how this will perform. Losses wiil come. The question is how often? I hope I will get the time to do more tests today.

[boyd30]

Very appreciated with easy and well done explainations. Especially also when your native language is not English.

[cht]

3 triggers ?

betting against the very first unique dozen formation you see in the 10 spin sequence against the same position of the next 10 spin sequence

[nottophammer]

(they are frequently unintelligible).

Have you ever thought, it might be you being a bit thick

[DoctorSudoku]

Have you ever thought, it might be you being a bit thick

There are many others also who are in the same boat as me when it comes to trying to understand some of your tables and their accompanying explanations.

[RayManZ]

There are many others also who are in the same boat as me when it comes to trying to understand some of your tables and their accompanying explanations.

Maybe a poll is a good idea.

Do you understand notto's posts?
Yes
No
Sometimes

I vote no

[celescliff]

Sorry notto, but i agree with sudoku and vote no on rayz poll as well. It may be super clear to you but it wouldn't hurt to tell what some of your sheets does sometimes.

[nottophammer]

well ask, i might be able to rephrase, are you going to do a poll on Falkor as well