Win....Why dont you?!

[MoneyT101]

The earlier guys proposed different carpet formats. Winkel stands out, he looks at distribution.

Cycles are distribution!

[Andre Chass]

Each spin is brand new information and the past cant help the future spins!

A gambler isn't betting on the wheel, he's betting on the statistics. Past data would appear to be relevant due to the sampling.

The numbers reset on the next spin. So its like the wheel is starting fresh but the DATA REMAINS... THE STATISTICS REMAINS!

For example, the chances of the black color hit in a sequence of ten spins are much higher than in just one spin.

[Andre Chass]

And what else can we do besides using the past data?

[cht]

Watch David McCandless visualization video if you wish to try something new.

"Let the dataset change your mindset."

If you've not seen it you don't know what's in it. Just ask the right question.

[stringbeanpc]

Watch David McCandless visualization video if you wish to try something new.

cht, Thanks for the recommendation.

Interesting video, IMO he says don't take the numbers at face value.
Instead all numbers must have a common denominator so they can be compared equally on the same basis.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zg-C8AAIGg

[MoneyT101]

Here is some information to help you out

1.You have to create your own world using the spins - In this world the game play has to be short.  Where if you get on a bad run its controlled.  The bad run will last maybe a couple spins and then new game starts.

2.Needs dependency, The spins need to mean something to each other.  There has to be a reason why this number and this number go together or why this and that make this pattern **THAT YOU CREATED**

3.You need to have a plan for every situation.  Nothing can catch you by surprise.  Everything should be expected.
  If your game has a limit whats the solution?   Is there a way to minimize the affect?

Your world, Your rules!

4. Create a game that doesn't have to be about predicting.  Predicting doesn't work - unlesss your using that remote viewing or a super computer or any other form that's not conventional and/or that requires technology.

Can we create a game that wins without predicting?

🤔

How can I lose when I am covering every number 😂

🐦🕳🐦

This is the first stage and the stage that CHE found with his consistent bet.  I believe he had losing games 1 out of 100 games. This bet will make you money but it's detectable if you play in a casino

Now the advanced version of this is using stitch bets and parallel games to increase  the difficulty and increase the profit and harder to get noticed.  It will look like random bets.

My programming skills aren't good so I will do what I can in excel to show a chart later

[MoneyT101]

Here is a screenshot chart of 3 games to 1000 spins

when i calculated everything i forgot to add the zero and i got lazy to include it afterward.  SO each time zero shows up i lose $1...calculate avg zero appearance in 1000 spins times 1 and subtract i guess

Bankroll at $2538 at 500 spins...final well over 4500
Bankroll at $2961 at 500 spins...final well over 5000
Bankroll at $2610 at 500 spins...final well over 5000

All flat bet using $9 as one unit

I could have done 2000 spins, 10,000 spins.  But there is no point, this is flatbetting!

[falkor2k15]

Nice! So your "game" is playing based around a repeat, right? And does "short" mean the limit of the repeat has to happen within few spins as possible? I always get confused by those two terms...

[MoneyT101]

Nice! So your "game" is playing based around a repeat, right? And does "short" mean the limit of the repeat has to happen within few spins as possible? I always get confused by those two terms...

I play every spin....repeat i lose anything else i WIN 

[atlantis]

Those graphs are impressive, MoneyT101.
May I ask R u doing repeats of dozens or EC?
A.

[MoneyT101]

Those graphs are impressive, MoneyT101.
May I ask R u doing repeats of dozens or EC?
A.

EC mixed with numbers

[falkor2k15]

EC mixed with numbers

Is that with stitching (the confusing version) or without stitching (the noticeable version)? Or both versions using EC mixed with numbers?

[Drazen]

This bet will make you money but it's detectable if you play in a casino

Hi there

Congratulations on your graphs! 

This quoted sentence is interesting to me in the way you said it. Why did you used word detectable? Being said that way sounds to me that casinos are aware of existence of that strategy and all they need is to recognize it in use?

Best

[MoneyT101]

Is that with stitching (the confusing version) or without stitching (the noticeable version)? Or both versions using EC mixed with numbers?

no stitching involved, this is the basic version

Ec bet wins 25%
Ec and numbers win 25%
numbers only win 50%

overall effect bankroll rises flatbet

This is not what redd or pri is doing.  There version is much more advanced but i am happy with this and ill continue to learn and study and evolve as time passes.  But first i will start to work on building a bankroll

I shared enough information in my last couple of post to figure it out and where to look.  Im still testing because normally i create something and looks good and then it fails lol....only difference with this now and before is that no progression is used 

[MoneyT101]

Hi there

Congratulations on your graphs! 

This quoted sentence is interesting to me in the way you said it. Why did you used word detectable? Being said that way sounds to me that casinos are aware of existence of that strategy and all they need is to recognize it in use?

Best

I honestly dont know why i used this specific word... but if i play next to anyone with experience they will understand the bet by looking at it and the past spins.  So im positive a casino can track based on my play, which is why i want to add another game to be played to throw things off.  I want it to look random like im playing everything to land a win anywhere.