The Permutation of Desolation

[Proofreaders2000]

I think I understand at least the
EC's portion of Falkor's first post. 

Different combinations of the three EC's you have
all sections covered except the highlighted numbers

& "deadlock" comes to mean the uncovered
numbers that can't be covered by the outside bets

or by conventional means w/o betting
singles, throwing off the outside bets.

The goal is to cheaply cover the table where the
outcome is break even or a small loss/or small win imo.

[falkor2k15]

Next test results for dynamic corners/splits/numbers are going to be MUCH clearer because I now show the actual numbers too and the defining element for the ECs - and I'll redo the Streets test to get more clarity than before.

[RouletteGhost]

Is this a joke.

[nottophammer]

Is this a joke.

defo RG
RG a game starts as soon as you start to play, the game is 38 non-hit over the pond, so now you track, watch how the 0x's come, it's simple they are the larger group, as the spins go merrily by, the 1's begin to show, so here's where you need to learn, how 0x's behave,ie, there avg to hit, you know theres on avg 15 in spins 11-40, work it from there, if unsure, read the GUT, learn how non-hit miss,it's all down to the count/ trot, LMAO, Falkor is no master and never will be, but a joker he will be. Cough,Duh, like that other joker, as well,

[RouletteGhost]

Yea man

I think he is an insane dis info spreader

He gets off on spreading disinformation

What a psychopath!

Why else would he dodge questions that are in relation to this topic or not explain it to where a normal human being could understand it

Might as well talk to himself.

Either he is a disinformation master, or he is incapable of explaining something simply, or he gets off on it.

When the hell are the moderators going to wake up and smell the coffee

If he is going to post such things, answer questions and explain it properly or don't do it at all

He should have been banned after the millionaires system thread

[nottophammer]

Rich, have you ever wondered how people can make such a simple game so hard

[falkor2k15]

Is this a joke.

No, it's not a joke!

--28 11 ( ) 7 ( RBdeadlock! OEdeadlock! HLdeadlock! CCL2o1d1 DCL2o2 LCL2o2 ) 24 ( ) 6 ( RBdeadlock! OEdeadlock! HLdeadlock! CCL2o2d3 DCL2o1 Qdeadlock! ) 24  NCL5o4 7 5

28 followed by 11 causes deadlocks on Red-Black, Odd-Even, and High-Low - but it doesn't get recorded till after the repeat (7).

It's called a deadlock because all uniques have hit once, so there's no more empty boxes/partitions/pigeonholes: 2 x 1 hit and 0 sleepers.
Red > Black
High > Low
Even > Odd

There needs to be at least 1 sleeper, otherwise it's a deadlock - we can no longer bet on a repeat!

Next number is 7: gives us repeats on Columns, Dozens and Lines.

Next number is 24: causes a deadlock on the 3 ECs again since the last cycle was retracked (always carrying over the defining element to the next cycle). This deadlock is recorded after 6 because the Cycle Length 2 repeat is what flags up the deadlock in my simulator - I could change this to detect the deadlock more accurately the spin before. Number 24 also caused a deadlock on Quads: 28 (28-36 = Q4),11 (10-18 = Q2), 7 (1-9 = Q1), 24 (19-27 = Q3)

The 6 caused a repeat on Columns and Dozens. The columns has d3 meaning the top column I think as the one that repeated or defined the cycle. I didn't record this info for Dozens because Columns are more important than Dozens!

Last number is 24. So that completes the number cycle. I don't record the fate of the other groups on that spin, so if I were to do stats on the best permutations it would be inaccurate. This test is mainly to show worst permutations.

The last 2 additional numbers are the number of deadlocks throughout the number cycle together with the number of repeats up to the penultimate spin before the numbers repeated.

[RouletteGhost]

Rich, have you ever wondered how people can make such a simple game so hard

Everyday

[falkor2k15]

Let me remind you all of the purpose of this topic and on-going tests...

One of the worst corner situations we could find ourselves in when playing corners is the following carpet arrangement:

The above we requires 6 corner bets to cover all the single-hits! However, if the single-hits were packed closer together instead of being evenly spread then we would only require 2 corner bets to cover them!

How did we end up in such a bad situation? Well, if we had bet column 2 to repeat then we would never have let Random do that to us!!

Bookmark this reply so I don't have to keep explaining!!!

[Steve]

Is this a joke.

To us, yes. To him, maybe posting a bunch of goblegarkle (made-up word) that no-one understands makes him feel smarter.

[Steve]

Next test results for dynamic corners/splits/numbers are going to be MUCH clearer because I now show the actual numbers too and the defining element for the ECs - and I'll redo the Streets test to get more clarity than before.

Falkor, could you please explain WHAT THE F*CK all that crap is?

Surely you dont expect anyone here to make sense of it, do you?

You believe in a flat Earth so I guess maybe you do expect people to understand it.

[RouletteGhost]

Falkor, could you please explain WHAT THE F*CK all that crap is?

Surely you dont expect anyone here to make sense of it, do you?

You believe in a flat Earth so I guess maybe you do expect people to understand it.

He knows no one really understand it

When people asks questions he dodges those questions

He refuses to simplify anything

He just goes on and on wasting his time

We are trying to have a productive roulette forum here. And when you finally get through to him he talks about 9/11 or Jews or something else. This is about roulette

[Steve]

I saw his explanation. And it's just crap. Anyway people should know now not to pay attention.

[RouletteGhost]

[RouletteGhost]

Next test results for dynamic corners/splits/numbers are going to be MUCH clearer because I now show the actual numbers too and the defining element for the ECs - and I'll redo the Streets test to get more clarity than before.