MPR

[maestro]

what kind of fecking criterion your score board works

[Steve]

ive explained the algorithm and reasons.

whats your problem with it exactly?

[maestro]

so player plays 200 some spins and loses then another plays 200 some spins and wins but player who lost more for same amount of spins is ranked higher...

[Steve]

The difference is amount wagered.

The rankings are based on win rate, anount wagered and spins played.

[maestro]

and why would say my ranking depends on how much lost some asshole.....your algo for score board is just shittt

amount wagered..means in same amount of spins as another player loser manage to blow more money and this is why he has to be higher ranked

[Steve]

and why would say my ranking depends on how much lost some asshole.....

Because your results are compared to the asshole's results. Duh...

your algo for score board is just shittt

Your brain is shittt. You probably think bankroll should be used to rank alone. The mpr algorithm is balanced and accounts for amount of spins, amount bet, and win rate. So its fair and cant be cheated by short term luck.

If you have a better algorithm, let's hear it. Well?...

I dont see you ranking well with any reasonable algorithm. Sorry.

[Lucky7Red]

and why would say my ranking depends on how much lost some asshole.....your algo for score board is just shittt

amount wagered..means in same amount of spins as another player loser manage to blow more money and this is why he has to be higher ranked

This asshole algo is working only for 1000 spins then is better to stop play.

[maestro]

Your brain is shittt. You probably think bankroll should be used to rank alone. The mpr algorithm is balanced and accounts for amount of spins, amount bet, and win rate. So its fair and cant be cheated by short term luck

i wish my brain was shittt as you pointed then people like you can have some great moments....
i will write it again so migh get it

amount of spins<same>
amount of bets<if two players have same amount of spins and one wager more but have negative score and another player wager less<means bets when he has to >and wins and have positive score<above 1>...then your great algo ranks losing player higher than wining player

in real situation i would like to be in wining player shoes not to the asshole who wagered milion and lost but is higher ranked

and yeah why you asking me for better algo i thought that one you have is great...or shell we say best to your ability to understand math


and last never mind my rankings is not about that

[Steve]

This asshole algo is working only for 1000 spins then is better to stop play.

Actually the more players play, the more accurate the algorithm is.

[Steve]

Maestro, its not realistically possible to accurately rank with so few spins difference. The algorithm is most accurate at the top, which is where it matters.

Im not the one with problems with math. And again you criticize but dont offer anything better. Typical.

I published the algorithm at the start so anyone can propose a better algorithm. Nobody did. Including you.

So ill ask again. Do you have something better?

[nottophammer]

Maestro your wasting your time, his head is like Pinocchio, a block of wood

[nottophammer]

and the more he lies the longer it grows

[maestro]

So ill ask again. Do you have something better?

just copy their one it shows performance of actual system without being related to another player...simple

and yeah if i remember Turbo offered Rx too..

[Steve]

Notto, you're making a dickhead of yourself. Where are the lies? I published the algorithm and equation openly.

[Roulettebeater]

But where do you get the money to finance your forum, MPR, hosting etc from ?

Do you receive donation from members ?

-;$)