EC Pointers?

[atlantis]

Has anyone tried a system like this before?

It's betting on EC and Line after a trigger of 4 DS results.

Track and record the standard DS (line) results.

Look back at the last 4 results recorded before making a betting decision.

The 4 results must be all different.

After 4 results are in check to see which High/Low has the MAJORITY decision - must be 3/1 in favour of one side or the other. This indicates an EC bet on the corresponding majority side - the High or the Low.

If it is a TIE between the High and Low results then wait for another result and look back at the new last 4 results to see if there is now a dominant (3-1 to H or L)

They must be 4 UNIQUE and different line results:
eg: 14625 - 4625 qualifies for H + DS2
eg: 44625 - 4625 does not qualify due to prior repetition on DS4. 
eg: 446254 - 6254 qualifies for H + DS2

Example:
=======

52415 - is a tie (2H/2L) = no bet

524152 - still a tie = no bet

5241523 - (3L/1H) LOW is dominant bet (LOW + DS5)

Suggested progression: FLATBET.  The bet is made with 1u on EC and 0.5u on LINE

After 4 DIFFERENT DS results where there is a majority of LOW or HIGH it could be expected a REPEAT DS to happen - it is very unlikely that to get all 6 DS to show in 6 results (but it can happen) so the reasoning or theory is to bet the dominant H/L EC as surely there is MORE CHANCE that the repeat, if it comes, will be in that section. The LINE is also covered in case of a repetition happening there.

Result can be:
+0.5 if EC wins
+1.5 if LINE wins
-1.5 if Lose

Stakes can be altered to cover 0 too if desired and take a smaller profit.

A.

[DoctorSudoku]

Look back at the last 4 results recorded before making a betting decision.

The 4 results must be all different.

After 4 results are in check to see which High/Low has the MAJORITY decision - must be 3/1 in favour of one side or the other. This indicates an EC bet on the corresponding majority side - the High or the Low.

If it is a TIE between the High and Low results then wait for another result and look back at the new last 4 results to see if there is now a dominant (3-1 to H or L)


A.

I will take a look at this interesting method over the weekend. Thanks for sharing it.

By the way, the above excerpt reminds me of a certain Mr. Moglizu and his "linearity-based" holy grail thread that he posted over at  betselection.cc about six months back.

I think you have good memories of that thread, don't you?   

[Herby]

Quick test, 1000000 spins, no zero
92658 subsets fulfill the criteria
31002 looser: lost 46503 units
61656 winner: won 46395 units

[Proofreaders2000]

Looks good Atlantis.   

A slight variation: column splits same
premise (eight numbers) also looks good

[atlantis]

Quick test, 1000000 spins, no zero
92658 subsets fulfill the criteria
31002 looser: lost 46503 units
61656 winner: won 46395 units

Thx for test!  Interesting!
Of course the ratio or amounts of the staking can be different... Also you could cover the zero... What if you just back the qualifying EC only at a flat 1u for same test, I wonder??
Anyhow my own quick test on real roulette numbers spinfile using above rules was 6/6 wins: 2@1.5 and 4@0.5 = +5u
(No zeroes occurred on the bets)
Regards,
A.

[RouletteGhost]

Good job herby

[Herby]

What if you just back the qualifying EC only at a flat 1u for same test, I wonder??

Hi atlantis,
just to get you right: you mean a test without betting the lines, other conditions stay the same ?
( to back a ...is not yet in my language repertoire, but I'm learning  )

[atlantis]

Hi atlantis,
just to get you right: you mean a test without betting the lines, other conditions stay the same ?
( to back a ...is not yet in my language repertoire, but I'm learning  )

You're right Herby. Conditions the same but just bet flat 1u on the EC; H or L

A.

[Herby]

O.k.
I' ll do it tomorrow, here' s allready bedtime for elder people like me 

[atlantis]

O.k.
I' ll do it tomorrow, here' s allready bedtime for elder people like me 

No rush. Your help in testing is greatly appreciated. Goodnight.

[vladir]

Can you specify of the wins, how many win 0.5 and how many won 1.5 ? Thanks.

[atlantis]

Looks good Atlantis.   

A slight variation: column splits same
premise (eight numbers) also looks good

Thanks for the tip Proof.

DoctorSudoku wrote:

By the way, the above excerpt reminds me of a certain Mr. Moglizu and his "linearity-based" holy grail thread that he posted over at  betselection.cc about six months back.

Haha! That was quite a novel idea "linearity" of his (for those that understood it) but, alas, after excel botted, it was proved conclusively not to work. Even moglizu admitted as much. I recall being quite disappointed at the time. I don't waste my time on it after that. Verdict: Fail - not Grail.



A.

[atlantis]

First real spinfile test this morning.
103 spins.
12 bets. 11Won; 1Lost. ( 7w@+0.5    4w@+1.5   1L@-1.5)
Profit = +8u. (flat)
I've attached the spin history from RXtreme.

A.

[romano0327]

Hi Atlantis,

Thank you for sharing, I will test a couple hundred spins and let you know the results, just to make sure, you only bet for one spin after a trigger ? If we loose or win that bet we start tracking again?

[atlantis]

Hi Atlantis,

Thank you for sharing, I will test a couple hundred spins and let you know the results, just to make sure, you only bet for one spin after a trigger ? If we loose or win that bet we start tracking again?

Depends. You are always looking at the most recent last 4 results. No need to retrack.

A.