How to play and win with VdW (from "Random Thoughts")

[Andre Chass]

P.s. You are betting 1200 to win 150. Eventually you will lose so be careful!

Yes, and I made 1.350,00 profit until now.

I know the day will come.

[Andre Chass]

Yes, and I made 1.350,00 profit until now.

I know the day will come.

I mean 1.500,00

[cht]

I totally support system creation

And a collaboration of minds

But to talk in riddles, pretend you have something special, and dodge around questions, is something that should receive zero tolerance!

P.s. You are betting 1200 to win 150. Eventually you will lose so be careful!

Winkel does not fall into this infamous group, he was explicitly clear enough with his posts, whether you agree with him or not is another matter.

The APers are just as bad if not worse yet they get away with the same thing.

[cht]

Priyanka's name needs to be added to that list. In recent years, she has been one of the biggest "baiters" on this forum with her seductive clues and hints about converting random outcomes into non-random outcomes and (supposedly) profiting from them.

For the last time, there's no such thing as non-random outcomes. Drop that silly idea!

[DoctorSudoku]

For the last time, there's no such thing as non-random outcomes. Drop that silly idea!

I do NOT  believe in non-random outcomes in a random game like roulette (as long as no biased wheels are involved).

I alluded to Priyanka's belief in them in my previous post -- so maybe you should poignantly express your irritation and/or reservations about this issue directly to her.

[bigmoney]

Just backtesting this ...on my version 1 looking good although ive lost a couple of banks its turning a profit ....
More finetuning required   to make it more selective and make it a real cash cow .....IM EXCITED

[Steve]

Nothing is ever truly random. It doesn't mean you can realistically change your odds.

[winkel]

I mean 1.500,00

You said this is rubbish und you won´t follow it.

So why don´t you trash one of your own 3 vdw-Threads?

[winkel]

Nothing is ever truly random. It doesn't mean you can realistically change your odds.

O my God. I never said this would change the odds, did I?

[Steve]

1. Relax. I wasn't talking to you.

2. If you claim to have a winning system, then you are claiming to change odds.

[winkel]

...
2. If you claim to have a winning system, then you are claiming to change odds.

Not neccessarily! But that´s a matter of conviction

[RouletteGhost]

I agree with winkel on that

You don't have to change the odds to have a winning system.

It's claiming to change odds that is BS

[cht]

Agree with winkel & RG.

We play winnable systems, not systems that change the odds.

Who claim to change the odds ?

APers ? VBers ?

Prove it else it's BULLSHITE !

[Andre Chass]

You said this is rubbish und you won´t follow it.

So why don´t you trash one of your own 3 vdw-Threads?

Are you crazy?

Please read my previous post before attacking me

[celescliff]

So if you have a winning system, if you havent changed the odds, what exactly have you changed for it to win?