The Steve way

[Steve]

cht are you talking about roulette computers or cross referencing?

In either case its not pure math and stats. They both require understanding of wheel physics for the actual algorithms.

[denzie]

. But there ar shortcuts that can be taken without needing computer software.

We're listening. Pls continue

[cht]

cht are you talking about roulette computers or cross referencing?

In either case its not pure math and stats. They both require understanding of wheel physics for the actual algorithms.

I was referring to house rules at my local b&m casino.

[kingmaq]

US$80,000. It is a requirement players see it fully before buying. So they are sure and they know exactly what theyre getting. Everyone who has seen it purchased it so far.

But you can also get it free and pay from winnings: :.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/ - i still accept most serious teams.

Only 80k? Which idiot can afford that ?
Is the high price only for the boom's effect ?

No comment

[maestro]

32,32,32.... its because variables like rotor speed contributed to it, NOT because they were "repeaters"

that is not true...you do have 32,32,32 because this is how random stream goes and has to happen...so simple eh

[Steve]

Im not going to reveal much more. Its enough information to head in the right direction. Once you understand why progression, sleepers, repeaters etc dont work, and why you need to increase accuracy of predictions..... then the most reasonable and obvious approach is to study cause and effect. Then you can model reality.

Understanding cause and effect (wheel physics) means youre looking at the right variables. Then create a model to explain it all. Its easy to model if variables were the same. But they are constantly changing. So you need a dynamic model that projetcs what happens when variables change.

At least this is my approach, and I find it the most reasonable and down to earth approach. Theres more to it but i explained the basics. It does no good for me to go on about it because i already explained all i want to explain. Not even my players fully know how it works. You can reverse engineer parts but not realistically the whole thing.

I suggest anyone interested just start with visual ballistics. Theres a basic free method on roulettephysics.com. You can build from there.

Most people say its impossible. But beating roulette is really not that difficult. But you need to accept the fact that you cant ralistically beat every wheel with a singular approach. And you wont win every time or without effort. It still takes time and effort. Its more involved than the RBBRBRBRB nonsense. And sometimes your time doesnt pay off for a while. Although when it does pay off, the results can be very good.

Is it the easiest way to make money i know of? Owning a bank is. But roulettte is very good too, although if you are playing for say $200 profit per session, its not worth the time. It is much better with high stakes. Dont find average conditions. Find perfect condictions then carefully plan a proper high stakes hit and run. One night can be $100k profit. Do it properly and it looks like luck to the casino.

[kingmaq]

Steve, all what you talking about is nice and true,  I have modeled all these variables in one solution... the only thing I am failing at is the "Discipline" it's the hardest task to master

[Steve]

Only 80k? Which idiot can afford that ?
Is the high price only for the boom's effect ?

No comment

Do you think people with $80k are really dumb and incapable of proper research?

I have many purchasers of the hybrid. The math is not hard to justify the price. One night of play can return the investment. But you know if i see a high roller in a good position, i prefer they take a kind of profit sharing arrangement. Most successful players in such an arrangement later opt to purchase.

[Steve]

that is not true...you do have 32,32,32 because this is how random stream goes and has to happen...so simple eh

Theres really no such thing as a "repeater". The term implies invalid logic, or fallacy. The correct understanding is simply thecause and effects alligned for those a particular spins. 32, 32, 32 can occur on three different wheels with no relation to each other too. If i saw such a sequence at first glance, id simply say well who knows what those variables were, but its going to happen with rng, and real wheels alike. I would not at all be more inclined to bet 32. Why would i be? It happens all the time. Its normal.

[kingmaq]

Do you think people with $80k are really dumb and incapable of proper research?

I have many purchasers of the hybrid. The math is not hard to justify the price. One night of play can return the investment. But you know if i see a high roller in a good position, i prefer they take a kind of profit sharing arrangement. Most successful players in such an arrangement later opt to purchase.

80k is big amount, only a few would buy, roulette is a game of risk, physics can tilt the game but risk Persists even with computer...

Is it possible to challenge your computer ? Can we do a test ?
I can record 10 minutes play from a live wheel and we do some tests...

[Steve]

that is not true...you do have 32,32,32 because this is how random stream goes and has to happen...so simple eh

Nothing ever "has to happen". Nothing is ever due. Proof is easy to establish. Just test how often 32 spins after thr sequence 32,32,32. Still 1 in 37.

Even if you have 32,32,32,32..... the odds of 3 spinning next are still 1 in 37. Nothing changed. Its normal probability.

[Steve]

Steve, all what you talking about is nice and true,  I have modeled all these variables in one solution... the only thing I am failing at is the "Discipline" it's the hardest task to master

Yes its tedious. Thats the main reeason i dont use my system. Computers are much. much faster to use.

[denzie]

Alright thx for the ...... well You didn't share anything(we can use) . I'm out 

Question was easy and since you wanna help ....

We sit down at the table. ... Now What ? Pfff nevermind coz a long text will follow with stuff the average Joe knows but can't use

I'm out

[kingmaq]

Alright thx for the ...... well You didn't share anything(we can use) . I'm out 

Question was easy and since you wanna help ....

We sit down at the table. ... Now What ? Pfff nevermind coz a long text will follow with stuff the average Joe knows but can't use

I'm out

Denise, why you not getting the point?
you can win if you study the dynamics of the wheel... but ithe journey gonna be complicated ... If you prove yourself to be over-disciplined guy, you might also win with any other strategy

[Steve]

80k is big amount, only a few would buy, roulette is a game of risk, physics can tilt the game but risk Persists even with computer...

Is it possible to challenge your computer ? Can we do a test ?
I can record 10 minutes play from a live wheel and we do some tests...

Roulette is not at all risky when done right. Do it right and theres little risk compared to potential gains. We never bet large unless we have no doubt the wheel is being destroyed (40%+ edge).

Ive done live in person and live webcam tests before. I announced them so anyone could attend. Ive also given my uber version up for independent testing with a well known and neutral forum member. Ive done more. In all ive done around 60 in-person demos too over around 8 years. There is no reasonable validation left for me to do. Another test will have the same result. Although 10 minutes is not enough to have conclusive data anyway.

Theres the free roulette computer i offer at :.roulette-computers.com/free-trial/ and the demos explained at :.roulettephysics.com/demonstrations/ and anyone can even just aim a webcam at any wheel and hear the computer predictions for a demo. the proof is really easy to provide but I only do the demos for purchasers. I already did many public demos like the recording i published just to prove a point people making false claims about me were lying pieces of shit.

again this wasnt supposed to be about my technology. You can ask privately about it.